Literature DB >> 27844238

Normal values of regional left ventricular myocardial thickness, mass and distribution-assessed by 320-detector computed tomography angiography in the Copenhagen General Population Study.

Louise Hindsø1, Andreas Fuchs2, Jørgen Tobias Kühl2, Emma Julia P Nilsson2, Per Ejlstrup Sigvardsen2, Lars Køber2, Børge G Nordestgaard3, Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed2,4.   

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy is associated with cardiovascular complications and the geometry is important for prognosis. In some cardiovascular diseases, myocardial hypertrophy or dilation occurs regionally without modifying the global size of the heart. It is therefore relevant to determine regional normal reference values of the left ventricle. The aim of this study was to derive reference values of regional LV myocardial thickness (LVMT) and mass (LVMM) from a healthy study group of the general population using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA). We wanted to introduce LV myocardial distribution (LVMD) as a measure of regional variation of the LVMT. Moreover, we wanted to determine whether these parameters varied between men and women. We studied 568 (181 men; 32%) adults, free of cardiovascular disease and risk factors, who underwent 320-detector CCTA. Mean age was 55 (range 40-84) years. Regional LVMT and LVMM were measured, according to the American Heart Association's 17 segment model, using semi-automatic software. Mean LVMT were 6.6 mm for men and 5.4 mm for women (p < 0.001). The normal LV was thickest in the basal septum (segment 3; men = 8.3 mm; women = 7.2 mm) and thinnest in the mid-ventricular anterior wall (segment 7; men = 5.6 mm; women = 4.5 mm) for both men and women. However, the regional LVMD differed between men and women, with the LV being most heterogenic in women. The normal human LV is morphologically heterogenic, and showed same overall pattern but different regional distribution for men and women. This study introduces LVMD and provides gender specific reference values for regional LVMT, LVMM, and LVMD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular computed tomography; Dimensions; Healthy population; Left ventricular myocardium; Reference values

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27844238     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-1015-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  31 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  The association of left ventricular mass with blood pressure, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption; data from the LARGE Heart study.

Authors:  John R Payne; Laurence E James; Kyriacos I Eleftheriou; Emma Hawe; Jack Mann; Alex Stronge; Karen Banham; Michael World; Steve E Humphries; Dudley J Pennell; Hugh E Montgomery
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Regional left ventricular deformation and geometry analysis provides insights in myocardial remodelling in mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  Aigul Baltabaeva; Maciej Marciniak; Bart Bijnens; James Moggridge; Feng J He; Tarek F Antonios; Graham A MacGregor; George R Sutherland
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-10-02

4.  2013 ESH/ESC Practice Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Robert Fagard; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Josep Redon; Alberto Zanchetti; Michael Böhm; Thierry Christiaens; Renata Cifkova; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Maurizio Galderisi; Diederick E Grobbee; Tiny Jaarsma; Paulus Kirchhof; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stephane Laurent; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Per Anton Sirnes; Peter Sleight; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Faiez Zannad
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 5.  Significance of left ventricular hypertrophy in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  E Kaplinsky
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.727

6.  Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  D Levy; R J Garrison; D D Savage; W B Kannel; W P Castelli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Asymmetric left ventricular remodeling due to isolated septal thickening in patients with systemic hypertension and normal left ventricular masses.

Authors:  P Verdecchia; C Porcellati; I Zampi; G Schillaci; C Gatteschi; M Battistelli; C Bartoccini; C Borgioni; A Ciucci
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Prognostic implications of left ventricular mass and geometry following myocardial infarction: the VALIANT (VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion) Echocardiographic Study.

Authors:  Anil Verma; Alessandra Meris; Hicham Skali; Jalal K Ghali; J Malcolm O Arnold; Mikhail Bourgoun; Eric J Velazquez; John J V McMurray; Lars Kober; Marc A Pfeffer; Robert M Califf; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-09

9.  Echocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  D Levy; D D Savage; R J Garrison; K M Anderson; W B Kannel; W P Castelli
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-04-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012) : the fifth joint task force of the European society of cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts).

Authors:  Joep Perk; Guy De Backer; Helmut Gohlke; Ian Graham; Zeljko Reiner; W M Monique Verschuren; Christian Albus; Pascale Benlian; Gudrun Boysen; Renata Cifkova; Christi Deaton; Shah Ebrahim; Miles Fisher; Giuseppe Germano; Richard Hobbs; Arno Hoes; Sehnaz Karadeniz; Alessandro Mezzani; Eva Prescott; Lars Ryden; Martin Scherer; Mikko Syvänne; Wilma J M Scholte Op Reimer; Christiaan Vrints; David Wood; Jose Luis Zamorano; Faiez Zannad
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2012-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  Survival Differences in Women and Men After Septal Myectomy for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Zahara Meghji; Anita Nguyen; Benish Fatima; Jeffrey B Geske; Rick A Nishimura; Steve R Ommen; Brian D Lahr; Joseph A Dearani; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Left Ventricular Mid-Diastolic Wall Thickness: Normal Values for Coronary CT Angiography.

Authors:  Jeroen Walpot; Daniel Juneau; Samia Massalha; Girish Dwivedi; Frank J Rybicki; Benjamin J W Chow; João R Inácio
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2019-12-19

3.  Coronary artery calcium assessed with calibrated mass scoring in asymptomatic individuals: results from the Copenhagen General Population Study.

Authors:  Andreas D Knudsen; Andreas Fuchs; J Tobias Kühl; Ben A Arnold; Børge G Nordestgaard; Lars V Køber; Klaus F Kofoed
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Troponin T but not C reactive protein is associated with future surgery for aortic stenosis: a population-based nested case-referent study.

Authors:  Anders Holmgren; Johan Ljungberg; Johan Hultdin; Bengt Johansson; Ingvar A Bergdahl; Ulf Näslund; Stefan Söderberg
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.