| Literature DB >> 26758087 |
K Ambal1, P Rahe1, A Payne1, J Slinkman2, C C Williams1, C Boehme1.
Abstract
Nuclear class="Gene">spins ofEntities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26758087 PMCID: PMC4725375 DOI: 10.1038/srep18531
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Schematic of the low-temperature current imaging experiment conducted on a phosphorus doped silicon substrate. A quartz tuning fork (qPlus sensor) with a Pt tip attached oscillates at f0 ~ 30 kHz. When a bias voltage V is applied to the probe, electrons tunnel from highly localized silicon dangling bond (blue ellipsoids) into the Pt tip. Due to high density of P dopants (indicated by green spheres), the substrate allows for percolation (path indicated by yellow halo) of charges through the bulk. Thus, recharging of the emptied dangling bond state through recombination is possible from a nearby P atom if the donor-dangling bond proximity permits. (b) Current map of a P doped, flash cleaned c-Si substrate without any silicon dioxide at 4.3 K in darkness. The tip-bias voltage applied for this measurement is 1.3 V. The bright patches represent the spatial distribution of charge percolation endpoints indicating electronic states consistent with the localization and density of P donor atoms. (c) AFM topography image taken simultaneously using the interaction between surface and probe. The individual step edges are resolved. Note the absence of correlation between the current map and the surface topography. We also note that this AFM topography image displays a very weak, albeit recognizable ghost image in the upper right corner of the imaged area. (d) Line profile of one patch as indicated by the dotted black line in (b). The FWHM of the Gaussian fit (red) of this patch is ~18 nm, corresponding to approximately 3 Bohr diameters of the P donor wave function. (e) High resolution image of the area indicated by the yellow box in (b) using identical condition of (b). A distinct, seemingly random fine structure for some of the patches attributed to the P donors is visible.
Figure 2Conduction AFM images of c-Si samples with different P surface and bulk concentrations prepared by ion implantation.
The tip-bias voltage applied for each measurement is (a) 1.1 V, (b) 1.3 V and (c) 1.2 V. (a) [P] = 5 × 1014 cm−3. No recognizable current maxima with significance above the noise level are observed. (b) [P] = 3 × 1017 cm−3. Current maxima with areal density of about ~4 × 1010 patches/cm−2 are observed. (c) [P] = 5 × 1018 cm−3. Current maxima with a high areal density ~2 × 1011 patches/cm−2 are observed. The observed densities of the patches fluctuate within a 12% range for different locations of the same sample, consistent with stochastic fluctuations expected from the given samples sizes. Note that the maximum current of ∼1pA in (b) and ∼5pA in (c) exceed the displayed current range. The current range was chosen in order to provide optimal contrast.
Figure 3STM images and conduction AFM images of a surface of a P-doped c-Si crystal right after a flash anneal (a,b) and after one day (c,d).
Initially, the surface has very few defects apart from step edges (a). After a day, the surface has more defects present (c). (b) A dark conduction AFM image taken at the same location and shortly after image (a) at a tip-bias voltage of 1.2 V. It shows that current maxima occur only at a few point-like defects which exist at the surface an at step edges. (c) After a day, a higher defect density has developed and now the P-donor patches appear in the dark conduction AFM image (d).
Figure 4(a) Current map obtained from the P doped c-Si substrate at a tip-bias of 1.0 V in darkness at 4.3 K after a thin SiO2 film was grown. Large (>20 nm) patches surrounded by low-current regions still exist, yet the fine structure of these patches is significantly more isolated. Overall, the measured current densities are lower as seen in (b), which represents an current map with higher scanning resolution obtained on the subarea of (a) marked by the yellow square. (c) Image zoomed into the subarea marked by a white square in (b). (d) Plot of the current marked in (c) by the red line as a function of lateral position. The displayed individual current maximum has a full width at half maximum of about 6 Å.
Figure 5(a–d) display samples of four qualitatively different types of I–V curves of more than 800 measured different I–V curves acquired on SiO2 covered Si(100) surfaces. (a) I–V curve with a single flat plateau region; (b) I–V curve without plateau as expected from a macroscopic silicon to platinum Schottky diode; (c) I–V curve with “tilted” plateau which consists of a local maximum followed by a local minimum; (d) I–V curve with double plateau. (e) Bar diagrams indicating the actual number of qualitatively distinct I–V curves shown in (a) to (d) based on the acquired data. The error bars represent the square root of the actual number. (f) Energy diagram of the doped silicon sample and tip including donor state and the interface dangling bond state (Pb center). (g) Histograms of the plateau-onset (brown) and -end (green) voltages of the 415 plateaus from data sets of I–V curves that display a single flat or tilted plateau similar to the data seen in (a,c). (h) Histogram (blue data) displaying the plateau widths of the given data sets (difference between plateau-onset and –end voltage of each curve) as well as the fit (orange line) with a two Gaussian functions (black lines). The good agreement indicates that there are at least two qualitatively different types of highly localized interface states responsible for the local current maxima at the surface. The two Gaussian functions are centered at 300(5) mV and 420(19) mV.