Literature DB >> 26754473

Validity and reliability of a locomotor stage-based functional rating scale in spinal cord injury.

B Maurer-Burkhard1, I Smoor1, A von Reumont1, G Deckstein2, I Stierle1, R Rupp1, C Schuld1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This is a prospective observational cohort study.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to apply and adapt a rating scale based on locomotor stages (LSs) derived from cerebral palsy (CP) to spinal cord injury (SCI) and to quantify its inter-rater reliability and construct validity.
METHODS: The inter-rater reliability of LSs originally developed for children with CP was tested in a chronic SCI cohort. On the basis of the distribution of the LSs for CP, Locomotor Stages in Spinal Cord Injury (LOSSCI) were defined. Their validity was then tested with the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) in another acute SCI cohort.
RESULTS: The 10-point LSs for CP were assessed by two raters in 65 chronic patients. Weighted Cohen's kappa (WCk) was 0.985 (P<0.0001). Only four mismatches were found, resulting in an accuracy of 93.4%. On the basis of the distribution of the LSs for CP in SCI, the five-point LOSSCI grading scale was developed. WCk of LOSSCI was 0.976 (P<0.0001). Only three mismatches between raters were found, resulting in an overall accuracy of 95.1%. The validity data sets consisted of 448 SCIM records from 161 patients obtained within the first year after injury. Spearman's correlation coefficients were the highest between LOSSCI and SCIM indoor mobility (room and toilet; R=0.82) and the lowest between LOSSCI and SCIM respiration and sphincter management (R=0.68).
CONCLUSION: LOSSCI provides a reliable and valid clinical tool to assess locomotor function in SCI. LOSSCI not only reflects bipedal walking but also covers a wide range of key motor skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26754473     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2015.223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  22 in total

Review 1.  Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria.

Authors:  Neil Aaronson; Jordi Alonso; Audrey Burnam; Kathleen N Lohr; Donald L Patrick; Edward Perrin; Ruth E Stein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011).

Authors:  Steven C Kirshblum; Stephen P Burns; Fin Biering-Sorensen; William Donovan; Daniel E Graves; Amitabh Jha; Mark Johansen; Linda Jones; Andrei Krassioukov; M J Mulcahey; Mary Schmidt-Read; William Waring
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Diagnostic criteria of traumatic central cord syndrome. Part 2: a questionnaire survey among spine specialists.

Authors:  J J van Middendorp; M H Pouw; K C Hayes; R Williams; H S Chhabra; C Putz; R P H Veth; A C H Geurts; S Aito; J Kriz; W McKinley; F W A van Asbeck; A Curt; M G Fehlings; H Van de Meent; A J F Hosman
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 4.  [Vojta's method as the early neurodevelopmental diagnosis and therapy concept].

Authors:  Grazyna Banaszek
Journal:  Przegl Lek       Date:  2010

Review 5.  A systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  T Lam; V K Noonan; J J Eng
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  [Reflex rotation as a pathway to human locomotion].

Authors:  V Vojta
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1970-11

7.  The reproducibility and convergent validity of the walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI) in chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Anthony S Burns; Jude J Delparte; Mary Patrick; Ralph J Marino; John F Ditunno
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  A new grading for easy and concise description of functional status after spinal cord lesions.

Authors:  V Bluvshtein; L Front; M Itzkovich; Y Benjamini; T Galili; I Gelernter; E Aidinoff; J Hart; L Tesio; F Biering-Sorensen; C Weeks; M T Laramee; C Craven; S L Hitzig; E Glaser; G Zeilig; S Aito; G Scivoletto; M Mecci; R J Chadwick; W S El Masry; A Osman; C A Glass; P Silva; B M Soni; B P Gardner; G Savic; E M Bergström; A Catz
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Evaluation of the ability of physical therapists to palpate intrapelvic motion with the Stork test on the support side.

Authors:  Barbara A Hungerford; Wendy Gilleard; Michael Moran; Cathryn Emmerson
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2007-05-01

10.  Recovery from a spinal cord injury: significance of compensation, neural plasticity, and repair.

Authors:  Armin Curt; Hubertus J A Van Hedel; Daniel Klaus; Volker Dietz
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.269

View more
  1 in total

1.  Influence of patient isolation due to colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms on functional recovery after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Peter Prang; Christian Schuld; Ruediger Rupp; Cornelia Hensel; Norbert Weidner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.