Literature DB >> 21808258

A new grading for easy and concise description of functional status after spinal cord lesions.

V Bluvshtein1, L Front, M Itzkovich, Y Benjamini, T Galili, I Gelernter, E Aidinoff, J Hart, L Tesio, F Biering-Sorensen, C Weeks, M T Laramee, C Craven, S L Hitzig, E Glaser, G Zeilig, S Aito, G Scivoletto, M Mecci, R J Chadwick, W S El Masry, A Osman, C A Glass, P Silva, B M Soni, B P Gardner, G Savic, E M Bergström, A Catz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disability scales do not enable the transmission of concise, meaningful and daily function description for clinical purposes. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional statistical analysis of 328 patients' Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) III item scores (SIS).
OBJECTIVE: To develop a concise and clinically interpretable data-based characterization of daily task accomplishment for patients with spinal cord lesions (SCLs).
SETTING: Multi-center study at 13 spinal units in 6 countries.
METHODS: Patients were grouped into clusters characterized by smaller differences between the patients' SIS within the clusters than between their centers, using the k-medoides algorithm. The number of clusters (k) was chosen according to the percent of SIS variation they explained and the clinical distinction between them.
RESULTS: Analysis showed that k=8 SIS clusters offer a good description of the patient population. The eight functional clusters were designated as A-H, each cluster (grade) representing a combination of task accomplishments. Higher grades were usually (but not always) associated with patients implementing more difficult tasks. Throughout rehabilitation, the patients' functional grade improved and the distribution of patients with similar functional grades within the total SCIM III score deciles remained stable.
CONCLUSIONS: A new classification based on SIS clusters enables a concise description of overall functioning and task accomplishment distribution in patients with SCL. A software tool is used to identify the patients' functional grade. Findings support the stability and utility of the grades for characterizing the patients' functional status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21808258     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2011.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  3 in total

1.  Validity and reliability of a locomotor stage-based functional rating scale in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  B Maurer-Burkhard; I Smoor; A von Reumont; G Deckstein; I Stierle; R Rupp; C Schuld
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Spinal cord ability ruler: an interval scale to measure volitional performance after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  R Reed; M Mehra; S Kirshblum; D Maier; D Lammertse; A Blight; R Rupp; L Jones; R Abel; N Weidner; A Curt; J Steeves
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Factors that influence functional ability in individuals with spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional, observational study.

Authors:  Bronwyn M Hastings; Mokgobadibe V Ntsiea; Steve Olorunju
Journal:  S Afr J Physiother       Date:  2015-06-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.