Literature DB >> 26753534

Reproducibility of transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements in clinical practice: a systematic review.

Raphaël Giraud1,2,3, Nils Siegenthaler4,5,6, Paolo Merlani4,7, Karim Bendjelid4,5,6.   

Abstract

Measuring cardiac output (CO) is an integral part of the diagnostic and therapeutic strategy in critically ill patients. During the last decade, the single transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) technique was implemented in clinical practice. The purpose of this paper was to systematically review and critically assess the existing data concerning the reproducibility of CO measured using TPTD (COTPTD). A total of 16 studies were identified to potentially be included in our study because these studies had the required information that allowed for calculating the reproducibility of COTPTD measurements. 14 adult studies and 2 pediatric studies were analyzed. In total, 3432 averaged CO values in the adult population and 78 averaged CO values in the pediatric population were analyzed. The overall reproducibility of COTPTD measurements was 6.1 ± 2.0 % in the adult studies and 3.9 ± 2.9 % in the pediatric studies. An average of 3 boluses was necessary for obtaining a mean CO value. Achieving more than 3 boluses did not improve reproducibility; however, achieving less than 3 boluses significantly affects the reproducibility of this technique. The present results emphasize that TPTD is a highly reproducible technique for monitoring CO in critically ill patients, especially in the pediatric population. Our findings suggest that obtaining a mean of 3 measurements for determining CO values is recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac output; Precision; Reproducibility; Transpulmonary thermodilution

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26753534     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9823-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  35 in total

Review 1.  A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output.

Authors:  Lester A Critchley; Anna Lee; Anthony M-H Ho
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Assessment of intrathoracic blood volume as an indicator of cardiac preload: single transpulmonary thermodilution technique versus assessment of pressure preload parameters derived from a pulmonary artery catheter.

Authors:  C Wiesenack; C Prasser; C Keyl; G Rödīg
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Effect of the mechanical ventilatory cycle on thermodilution right ventricular volumes and cardiac output.

Authors:  A B Groeneveld; R R Berendsen; A J Schneider; I A Pneumatikos; L A Stokkel; L G Thijs
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2000-07

4.  Indicator amount, temperature, and intrinsic cardiac output affect thermodilution cardiac output accuracy and reproducibility.

Authors:  L E Renner; M J Morton; G Y Sakuma
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice.

Authors:  C W Stetz; R G Miller; G E Kelly; T A Raffin
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1982-12

6.  Extravascular lung water measurement using transpulmonary thermodilution in children.

Authors:  Joris Lemson; Ad P Backx; Anton M van Oort; Tijn P W J M Bouw; Johannes G van der Hoeven
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.624

7.  Estimation of left ventricular systolic function by single transpulmonary thermodilution.

Authors:  Alain Combes; Jean-Baptiste Berneau; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Jean-Louis Trouillet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Frédéric Michard; Sami Alaya; Véronique Zarka; Mabrouk Bahloul; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 9.  Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography.

Authors:  Simon Sanderson; Iain D Tatt; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Effect of norepinephrine dosage and calibration frequency on accuracy of pulse contour-derived cardiac output.

Authors:  Matthias Gruenewald; Patrick Meybohm; Jochen Renner; Ole Broch; Amke Caliebe; Norbert Weiler; Markus Steinfath; Jens Scholz; Berthold Bein
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2017 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Refilling and preload dependence failed to predict cardiac index decrease during fluid removal with continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Matthias Jacquet-Lagrèze; Martin Ruste; William Fornier; Pierre-Louis Jacquemet; Remi Schweizer; Jean-Luc Fellahi
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 4.393

3.  Do ScvO2 variations induced by passive leg raising predict fluid responsiveness? A prospective study.

Authors:  Raphaël Giraud; Bojana Vujovic; Benjamin Assouline; Ivo Neto Silva; Karim Bendjelid
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-09

4.  Transpulmonary thermodilution in patients treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Gregor Loosen; Alice Marguerite Conrad; Michael Hagman; Nils Essert; Manfred Thiel; Thomas Luecke; Joerg Krebs
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 5.  Cardiac Output Monitoring in Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Matthew McGovern; Jan Miletin
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Cardiac output monitoring with pulmonary versus trans-cardiopulmonary thermodilution in left ventricular assist devices: Interchangeable methods?

Authors:  Begoña Quintana-Villamandos; Mónica Barranco; Ignacio Fernández; Manuel Ruiz; Juan Francisco Del Cañizo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 7.  Haemodynamic monitoring in acute heart failure - what you need to know.

Authors:  Karolina Jasińska-Gniadzik; Piotr Szwed; Aleksandra Gasecka; Mateusz Zawadka; Marcin Grabowski; Arkadiusz Pietrasik
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 1.065

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.