Literature DB >> 26752147

Adverse reactions during stem cell infusion in children treated with autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

T H Truong1, R Moorjani1, D Dewey2, G M T Guilcher1, N L Prokopishyn3, V A Lewis1.   

Abstract

Adverse reactions (ARs) during the infusion of cellular therapy products (CTPs) are common in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We retrospectively studied pediatric patients undergoing autologous and allogeneic HSCT to determine the incidence and grade of ARs during stem cell infusion and their predictors. We analyzed data from 213 patients (120 allogeneic and 93 autologous) who received at least 1 CTP, totaling 361 infusion episodes. Serious ARs, defined as grade 2 and 3, occurred in 25 and 11% of infusions, respectively. No grade 4 or 5 ARs were noted. Independent risk factors for developing a serious AR included stem cell source (PBSC vs marrow (odds ratio (OR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4-9); cord vs marrow (OR 7.3, 95% CI: 1.3-40), overall P=0.0001) but manipulated CTPs were protective (OR 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2-0.7, P=0.004). Unlike previous adult studies, WBC and granulocyte content were not found to be risk factors in this pediatric population. These data suggest that children tolerate higher WBC content during infusion of CTPs and support the use of manipulated CTP, as indicated, to reduce the risk of adverse infusion reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26752147     DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2015.331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  28 in total

1.  An automatic wash method for dimethyl sulfoxide removal in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation decreases the adverse effects related to infusion.

Authors:  Andrés Sánchez-Salinas; Valentín Cabañas-Perianes; Miguel Blanquer; María Juliana Majado; Carmen Luisa Insausti; Jorge Monserrat; Maria Victoria Sánchez-Ibáñez; Pilar Menchón; Ana García-Hernández; Joaquín Gómez-Espuch; Alfonso Morales; José M Moraleda
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Clinical toxicity of cryopreserved circulating progenitor cells infusion.

Authors:  A Zambelli; G Poggi; G Da Prada; P Pedrazzoli; A Cuomo; D Miotti; C Perotti; P Preti; G Robustelli della Cuna
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  Comparison of cord blood thawing methods on cell recovery, potency, and infusion.

Authors:  Donna M Regan; Jonathan D Wofford; Donna A Wall
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Dimethylsulphoxide-induced serum hyperosmolality after cryopreserved stem-cell graft.

Authors:  S Thomé; J Craze; C Mitchell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-11-19       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Fatal cardiac arrhythmia after infusion of dimethyl sulfoxide-cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cells in a patient with severe primary cardiac amyloidosis and end-stage renal failure.

Authors:  R Zenhäusern; A Tobler; L Leoncini; O M Hess; P Ferrari
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.673

6.  Clinical toxicity of cryopreserved bone marrow graft infusion.

Authors:  J M Davis; S D Rowley; H G Braine; S Piantadosi; G W Santos
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Should the standard dimethyl sulfoxide concentration be reduced? Results of a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation prospective noninterventional study on usage and side effects of dimethyl sulfoxide.

Authors:  Curly Morris; Liesbeth de Wreede; Marijke Scholten; Ronald Brand; Anja van Biezen; Anna Sureda; Ebbe Dickmeiss; Marek Trneny; Jane Apperley; Patrizia Chiusolo; Gustaaf W van Imhoff; Stig Lenhoff; Giovanni Martinelli; Marcus Hentrich; Thomas Pabst; Francesco Onida; Michael Quinn; Nicolaus Kroger; Theo de Witte; Tapani Ruutu
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 8.  Current thawing and infusion practice of cryopreserved cord blood: the impact on graft quality, recipient safety, and transplantation outcomes.

Authors:  Salem Akel; Donna Regan; Donna Wall; Laurence Petz; Jeffrey McCullough
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Occurrence and severity of adverse events after autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell infusion are related to the amount of granulocytes in the apheresis product.

Authors:  Boris Calmels; Claude Lemarié; Benjamin Esterni; Caroline Malugani; Aude Charbonnier; Diane Coso; Jean-Marc Schiano de Colella; Eric Deconinck; Denis Caillot; Frédéric Viret; Patrick Ladaique; Valérie Lapierre; Christian Chabannon
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Infusion technique of hematopoietic progenitor cells and related adverse events (CME).

Authors:  Sudhanshu B Mulay; Carl W Greiner; Amy Mohr; Sandra C Bryant; Ravi K Lingineni; Doug Padley; William J Hogan; Dennis A Gastineau; Eapen K Jacob
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.157

View more
  5 in total

1.  CGRP gene-modified rBMSCs show better osteogenic differentiation capacity in vitro.

Authors:  Xijiao Yu; Shuang Liu; Hui Chen; Xinyu Zhao; Xue Chen; Yi Du; Shu Li
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.611

2.  Infusion reactions in natural killer cell immunotherapy: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Tewodros Mamo; Shelly M Williams; Stephanie Kinney; Katelyn M Tessier; Todd E DeFor; Sarah Cooley; Jeffrey S Miller; David H McKenna
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 6.196

3.  Safety study of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell therapy in animal model.

Authors:  Alvin Man Lung Chan; Angela Min Hwei Ng; Mohd Heikal Mohd Yunus; Ruszymah Bt Hj Idrus; Jia Xian Law; Muhammad Dain Yazid; Kok-Yong Chin; Sharen Aini Shamsuddin; Mohd Rafizul Mohd Yusof; Rabiatul Adawiyah Razali; Mohd Asyraf Mat Afandi; Muhammad Najib Fathi Hassan; See Nguan Ng; Benson Koh; Yogeswaran Lokanathan
Journal:  Regen Ther       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.419

4.  Banking of AT-MSC and its Influence on Their Application to Clinical Procedures.

Authors:  Ekaterina Semenova; Mariusz P Grudniak; Katarzyna Bocian; Magdalena Chroscinska-Krawczyk; Marzena Trochonowicz; Igor M Stepaniec; Magdalena Murzyn; Ilona Szablowska-Gadomska; Dariusz Boruczkowski; Tomasz Oldak; Eugeniusz K Machaj
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-30

Review 5.  Management guidelines for paediatric patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.

Authors:  Katayoun Rezvani; Sattva S Neelapu; Elizabeth J Shpall; Kris M Mahadeo; Sajad J Khazal; Hisham Abdel-Azim; Julie C Fitzgerald; Agne Taraseviciute; Catherine M Bollard; Priti Tewari; Christine Duncan; Chani Traube; David McCall; Marie E Steiner; Ira M Cheifetz; Leslie E Lehmann; Rodrigo Mejia; John M Slopis; Rajinder Bajwa; Partow Kebriaei; Paul L Martin; Jerelyn Moffet; Jennifer McArthur; Demetrios Petropoulos; Joan O'Hanlon Curry; Sarah Featherston; Jessica Foglesong; Basirat Shoberu; Alison Gulbis; Maria E Mireles; Lisa Hafemeister; Cathy Nguyen; Neena Kapoor
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 66.675

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.