Literature DB >> 21126251

Comparison of cord blood thawing methods on cell recovery, potency, and infusion.

Donna M Regan1, Jonathan D Wofford, Donna A Wall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) products have traditionally been thawed using a washing method intended to stabilize the cells, reduce dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) toxicity, and remove potentially ABO-incompatible red blood cell (RBC) stroma and plasma. Concerns with this approach include loss of total nucleated cells (TNCs), bag breakage during centrifugation, and poor reproducibility by transplant centers unfamiliar with this technique. We rationalized that a simple 1:1 dilution without centrifugation would stabilize the product and reduce the DMSO concentration by 50%, allowing for a controlled thaw in the laboratory without the risks of cell loss. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We compared the traditional wash method with albumin reconstitution (dilution) and thaw only (no dilution or wash), assessing measurements of viability, TNC, CD34, and colony-forming cell (CFC) recovery post-thaw. Ten cryopreserved UCB products were thawed, split equally into three parts, and treated using each method. Product stability was measured at multiple time intervals up to 48hours post-thaw.
RESULTS: Throughout the entire evaluation, traditional wash and dilution methods performed equally well with no significant differences observed in 7-aminoactinomycin viability, TNC, CD34, or CFC recovery. For 163 patients in which diluted products were administered, there were no serious adverse effects at infusion and similar time to engraftment was observed when compared to historical experiences with traditional wash and direct infusion.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that removing DMSO, RBC stroma, and plasma post-thaw using a wash method is not necessary when UCB products are RBC and plasma reduced before cryopreservation.
© 2010 American Association of Blood Banks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21126251     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02803.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of pre-cryopreserved and post-thaw-and-wash-nucleated cell count on major outcomes following unrelated cord blood transplant in children.

Authors:  Meghann Pine McManus; Li Wang; Cassie Calder; Becky Manes; Misty Evans; Kathryn Bruce; Richard H Ho; Jennifer Domm; Haydar Frangoul
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2012-04-26

2.  Effect of Cryopreservation on Autologous Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Characteristics.

Authors:  Sandhya R Panch; Sandeep K Srivastava; Nasha Elavia; Andrew McManus; Shutong Liu; Ping Jin; Steven L Highfill; Xiaobai Li; Pradeep Dagur; James N Kochenderfer; Terry J Fry; Crystal L Mackall; Daniel Lee; Nirali N Shah; David F Stroncek
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 11.454

3.  Development and implementation of a computerized system for collection, processing, and administration of cellular therapy products.

Authors:  Laura C Gatzos; Susan Barbetti; Suzanne Bas-Davis; Albert Mailman; Philip Brzezinski; Paul Ruseau; Holly Barr Vermilya; Darlys Schott; Edna Marston; Olive J Sturtevant; Jerome Ritz; Lawrence N Shulman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Adverse reactions during stem cell infusion in children treated with autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  T H Truong; R Moorjani; D Dewey; G M T Guilcher; N L Prokopishyn; V A Lewis
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 5.  Umbilical cord blood banking: an update.

Authors:  Merlin G Butler; Jay E Menitove
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  "No wash" albumin-dextran dilution for double-unit cord blood transplantation is safe with high rates of sustained donor engraftment.

Authors:  Parastoo B Dahi; Doris M Ponce; Sean Devlin; Katherine L Evans; Marissa N Lubin; Anne Marie Gonzales; Joann Tonon; Richard Meagher; Sergio Giralt; Nancy A Kernan; Andromachi Scaradavou; Juliet N Barker
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Modelling improvements in cell yield of banked umbilical cord blood and the impact on availability of donor units for transplantation into adults.

Authors:  Natasha Kekre; Jennifer Philippe; Ranjeeta Mallick; Susan Smith; David Allan
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 8.  Umbilical cord blood quality and quantity: Collection up to transplantation.

Authors:  Seyed Hadi Mousavi; Morteza Zarrabi; Saeid Abroun; Mona Ahmadipanah; Bahareh Abbaspanah
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2019-12-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.