Literature DB >> 26751581

A review of virtual reality based training simulators for orthopaedic surgery.

Neil Vaughan1, Venketesh N Dubey2, Thomas W Wainwright3, Robert G Middleton3.   

Abstract

This review presents current virtual reality based training simulators for hip, knee and other orthopaedic surgery, including elective and trauma surgical procedures. There have not been any reviews focussing on hip and knee orthopaedic simulators. A comparison of existing simulator features is provided to identify what is missing and what is required to improve upon current simulators. In total 11 hip replacements pre-operative planning tools were analysed, plus 9 hip trauma fracture training simulators. Additionally 9 knee arthroscopy simulators and 8 other orthopaedic simulators were included for comparison. The findings are that for orthopaedic surgery simulators in general, there is increasing use of patient-specific virtual models which reduce the learning curve. Modelling is also being used for patient-specific implant design and manufacture. Simulators are being increasingly validated for assessment as well as training. There are very few training simulators available for hip replacement, yet more advanced virtual reality is being used for other procedures such as hip trauma and drilling. Training simulators for hip replacement and orthopaedic surgery in general lag behind other surgical procedures for which virtual reality has become more common. Further developments are required to bring hip replacement training simulation up to date with other procedures. This suggests there is a gap in the market for a new high fidelity hip replacement and resurfacing training simulator.
Copyright © 2015 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Haptics; Hip replacement; Modelling; Orthopaedic; Resurfacing; Simulator

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26751581     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  16 in total

1.  What is the value of 3D virtual reality in understanding acetabular fractures?

Authors:  Lars Brouwers; Albert F Pull Ter Gunne; Mariska A de Jongh; Thomas J J Maal; Rinaldo Vreeken; Frank H W M van der Heijden; Luke P H Leenen; Willem R Spanjersberg; Sven H van Helden; Diederik O Verbeek; Mike Bemelman; Koen W W Lansink
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-17

2.  Virtual and augmented reality for surgical training and simulation in knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Graham S Goh; Ryan Lohre; Javad Parvizi; Danny P Goel
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Application of virtual reality technology in clinical medicine.

Authors:  Lan Li; Fei Yu; Dongquan Shi; Jianping Shi; Zongjun Tian; Jiquan Yang; Xingsong Wang; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  How to Build a Patient-Specific Hybrid Simulator for Orthopaedic Open Surgery: Benefits and Limits of Mixed-Reality Using the Microsoft HoloLens.

Authors:  Sara Condino; Giuseppe Turini; Paolo D Parchi; Rosanna M Viglialoro; Nicola Piolanti; Marco Gesi; Mauro Ferrari; Vincenzo Ferrari
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 5.  The evolution of virtual reality in shoulder and elbow surgery.

Authors:  Ryan Lohre; Jon J P Warner; George S Athwal; Danny P Goel
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-05-07

6.  Virtual reality in spinal endoscopy: a paradigm shift in education to support spine surgeons.

Authors:  Ryan Lohre; Jeffrey C Wang; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Danny P Goel
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

7.  Virtual Simulation for Interactive Visualization of 3D Fracture Fixation Biomechanics.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Hwabok Wee; Jared Vicory; April D Armstrong; J Spence Reid
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Does Virtual Reality Improve Procedural Completion and Accuracy in an Intramedullary Tibial Nail Procedure? A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Mark D Orland; Michael J Patetta; Michael Wieser; Erdan Kayupov; Mark H Gonzalez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Three-dimensional printing model improves morphological understanding in acetabular fracture learning: A multicenter, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Zhenfei Huang; Wenhao Song; Yaoshen Zhang; Qiang Zhang; Dongsheng Zhou; Xi Zhou; Yu He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Efficacy of a Virtual Arthroscopic Simulator for Orthopaedic Surgery Residents by Year in Training.

Authors:  Shahram S Yari; Chanakya K Jandhyala; Behnam Sharareh; Aravind Athiviraham; Theodore B Shybut
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.