Literature DB >> 10708469

Transesophageal 3-dimensional echocardiography: in vivo determination of left ventricular mass in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

H P Kühl1, A Bücker, A Franke, S Maul, C Nolte-Ernsting, T Reineke, R Hoffmann, R W Günther, P Hanrath.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of transesophageal 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the in vivo calculation of left ventricular mass (LVM). In addition, mass values obtained by M-mode echocardiography were compared with those calculated by MRI. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the left ventricle was performed from a transesophageal and transgastric transducer position with a multiplane transducer in 20 patients. Left ventricular mass was calculated from both transducer positions by using slices of various thicknesses, ranging from 5 to 20 mm. Reproducibility was determined by 5 repeated measurements of mass in each of 5 randomly selected left ventricles. M-mode echocardiography was performed according to the method described by Devereux. For MRI, multiple short-axis views with 10-mm slice thickness were acquired in inspiration hold. Correlation was high for mass determined by 3DE and MRI (for 10-mm slice thickness: r = 0.99; y = 0.99 x - 0.7 g; standard error of estimate = 8.5 g; P <.001). There was no statistical bias, and the limits of agreement ranged from +/-16.4 g to +/-27.2 g, depending on the slice thickness. Variability was lowest for a slice thickness of 10 mm (SD +/- 8.2 g). The reproducibility of mass determination was excellent (mean width of the 95% CI 12.8 g). Left ventricular mass values calculated from the transgastric and transesophageal transducer position were not different from each other (mean bias 0.6 +/- 9.1 g; P = ns). M-mode-based LVM calculations showed systematic overestimation and large measurement variability (bias 23.7 g; 95% CI +/- 92.8 g). Compared with MRI, transesophageal 3DE is an accurate and reproducible method for the determination of LVM and clearly superior to M-mode echocardiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10708469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  7 in total

1.  Improved quantification of left ventricular mass based on endocardial and epicardial surface detection with real time three dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  E G Caiani; C Corsi; L Sugeng; P MacEneaney; L Weinert; V Mor-Avi; R M Lang
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Three-dimensional echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular mass: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and two-dimensional echocardiographic determinations in man.

Authors:  M L Chuang; R A Beaudin; M F Riley; M G Mooney; W J Mannin; P S Douglas; M G Hibberd
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  2000-10

Review 3.  Increased left ventricular mass as a predictor of sudden cardiac death: is it time to put it to the test?

Authors:  Steven M Stevens; Kyndaron Reinier; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-02

4.  Automated Assessment of Left Ventricular Function and Mass Using Heart Deformation Analysis: Initial Experience in 160 Older Adults.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Jeremy D Collins; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Marie-Pierre Jolly; Debiao Li; Michael Markl; James C Carr
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Mass Estimation: Two-Dimensional Area-Length Method is Superior to M-Mode Linear Method in Swine Models of Cardiac Diseases.

Authors:  Satoshi Miyashita; Nadjib Hammoudi; Shin Watanabe; Olympia Bikou; Kelly Yamada; Jaume Aguero; Koichi Nomoto; Taro Kariya; Kenneth Fish; Roger J Hajjar; Kiyotake Ishikawa
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Comprehensive First-Line Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Hypertension: Experience From a Single-Center Tertiary Referral Clinic.

Authors:  Amy E Burchell; Jonathan C L Rodrigues; Max Charalambos; Laura E K Ratcliffe; Emma C Hart; Julian F R Paton; Andreas Baumbach; Nathan E Manghat; Angus K Nightingale
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in systemic hypertension.

Authors:  Alicia M Maceira; Raad H Mohiaddin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.364

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.