Literature DB >> 26748039

System models for PET statistical iterative reconstruction: A review.

A Iriarte1, R Marabini2, S Matej3, C O S Sorzano4, R M Lewitt3.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a nuclear imaging modality that provides in vivo quantitative measurements of the spatial and temporal distribution of compounds labeled with a positron emitting radionuclide. In the last decades, a tremendous effort has been put into the field of mathematical tomographic image reconstruction algorithms that transform the data registered by a PET camera into an image that represents slices through the scanned object. Iterative image reconstruction methods often provide higher quality images than conventional direct analytical methods. Aside from taking into account the statistical nature of the data, the key advantage of iterative reconstruction techniques is their ability to incorporate detailed models of the data acquisition process. This is mainly realized through the use of the so-called system matrix, that defines the mapping from the object space to the measurement space. The quality of the reconstructed images relies to a great extent on the accuracy with which the system matrix is estimated. Unfortunately, an accurate system matrix is often associated with high reconstruction times and huge storage requirements. Many attempts have been made to achieve realistic models without incurring excessive computational costs. As a result, a wide range of alternatives to the calculation of the system matrix exists. In this article we present a review of the different approaches used to address the problem of how to model, calculate and store the system matrix.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Nuclear imaging; PET; Statistical reconstruction; System matrix; System model; System response model

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26748039     DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph        ISSN: 0895-6111            Impact factor:   4.790


  5 in total

1.  The impact of iterative reconstruction protocol, signal-to-background ratio and background activity on measurement of PET spatial resolution.

Authors:  Sahar Rezaei; Pardis Ghafarian; Mehrdad Bakhshayesh-Karam; Carlos F Uribe; Arman Rahmim; Saeed Sarkar; Mohammad Reza Ay
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Evaluation of STIR Library Adapted for PET Scanners with Non-Cylindrical Geometry.

Authors:  Viet Dao; Ekaterina Mikhaylova; Max L Ahnen; Jannis Fischer; Kris Thielemans; Charalampos Tsoumpas
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-06-18

3.  Dynamic cardiac PET imaging: Technological improvements advancing future cardiac health.

Authors:  Grant T Gullberg; Uttam M Shrestha; Youngho Seo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  How Do the More Recent Reconstruction Algorithms Affect the Interpretation Criteria of PET/CT Images?

Authors:  Antonella Matti; Giacomo Maria Lima; Cinzia Pettinato; Francesca Pietrobon; Felice Martinelli; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-05-01

5.  Ordered subset expectation maximisation vs Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction algorithm in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT.

Authors:  Ewa Witkowska-Patena; Anna Budzyńska; Agnieszka Giżewska; Mirosław Dziuk; Agata Walęcka-Mazur
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 2.668

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.