Literature DB >> 23045335

Constriction of isolated collecting lymphatic vessels in response to acute increases in downstream pressure.

Joshua P Scallan1, John H Wolpers, Michael J Davis.   

Abstract

Collecting lymphatic vessels generate pressure to transport lymph downstream to the subclavian vein against a significant pressure head. To investigate their response to elevated downstream pressure, collecting lymphatic vessels containing one valve (incomplete lymphangion) or two valves (complete lymphangion) were isolated from the rat mesentery and tied to glass cannulae capable of independent pressure control. Downstream pressure was selectively raised to various levels, either stepwise or ramp-wise, while keeping upstream pressure constant. Diameter and valve positions were tracked under video microscopy, while intralymphangion pressure was measured concurrently with a servo-null micropipette. Surprisingly, a potent lymphatic constriction occurred in response to the downstream pressure gradient due to (1) a pressure-dependent myogenic constriction and (2) a frequency-dependent decrease in diastolic diameter. The myogenic index of the lymphatic constriction (-3.3 ± 0.6, in mmHg) was greater than that of arterioles or collecting lymphatic vessels exposed to uniform increases in pressure (i.e. upstream and downstream pressures raised together). Additionally, the constriction was transmitted to the upstream lymphatic vessel segment even though it was protected from changes in pressure by a closed intraluminal valve; the conducted constriction was blocked by loading only the pressurized half of the vessel with either ML-7 (0.5 mm) to block contraction, or cromakalim (3 μm) to hyperpolarize the downstream muscle layer. Finally, we provide evidence that the lymphatic constriction is important to maintain normal intraluminal valve closure during each contraction cycle in the face of an adverse pressure gradient, which probably protects the lymphatic capillaries from lymph backflow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23045335      PMCID: PMC3577519          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.237909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  24 in total

1.  Differential effects of myosin light chain kinase inhibition on contractility, force development and myosin light chain 20 phosphorylation of rat cervical and thoracic duct lymphatics.

Authors:  Zhanna V Nepiyushchikh; Sanjukta Chakraborty; Wei Wang; Michael J Davis; David C Zawieja; Mariappan Muthuchamy
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Myogenic constriction and dilation of isolated lymphatic vessels.

Authors:  Michael J Davis; Ann M Davis; Christine W Ku; Anatoliy A Gashev
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Rate-sensitive contractile responses of lymphatic vessels to circumferential stretch.

Authors:  Michael J Davis; Ann M Davis; Megan M Lane; Christine W Ku; Anatoliy A Gashev
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Adaptation of mesenteric collecting lymphatic pump function following acute alcohol intoxication.

Authors:  Flavia M Souza-Smith; Kristine M Kurtz; Patricia E Molina; Jerome W Breslin
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 5.  Molecular regulation of lymphatic contractility.

Authors:  Mariappan Muthuchamy; David Zawieja
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Determinants of valve gating in collecting lymphatic vessels from rat mesentery.

Authors:  Michael J Davis; Elaheh Rahbar; Anatoliy A Gashev; David C Zawieja; James E Moore
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 7.  Perspective: physiological role(s) of the vascular myogenic response.

Authors:  Michael J Davis
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Phasic contractions of rat mesenteric lymphatics increase basal and phasic nitric oxide generation in vivo.

Authors:  H Glenn Bohlen; Wei Wang; Anatoliy Gashev; Olga Gasheva; Dave Zawieja
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 4.733

9.  Nitric oxide formation by lymphatic bulb and valves is a major regulatory component of lymphatic pumping.

Authors:  H Glenn Bohlen; Olga Yu Gasheva; David C Zawieja
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.733

10.  In vivo determination of collecting lymphatic vessel permeability to albumin: a role for lymphatics in exchange.

Authors:  Joshua P Scallan; Virginia H Huxley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  37 in total

1.  FOXC2 and fluid shear stress stabilize postnatal lymphatic vasculature.

Authors:  Amélie Sabine; Esther Bovay; Cansaran Saygili Demir; Wataru Kimura; Muriel Jaquet; Yan Agalarov; Nadine Zangger; Joshua P Scallan; Werner Graber; Elgin Gulpinar; Brenda R Kwak; Taija Mäkinen; Inés Martinez-Corral; Sagrario Ortega; Mauro Delorenzi; Friedemann Kiefer; Michael J Davis; Valentin Djonov; Naoyuki Miura; Tatiana V Petrova
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Mechanobiological oscillators control lymph flow.

Authors:  Christian Kunert; James W Baish; Shan Liao; Timothy P Padera; Lance L Munn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Consequences of intravascular lymphatic valve properties: a study of contraction timing in a multi-lymphangion model.

Authors:  Christopher D Bertram; Charlie Macaskill; Michael J Davis; James E Moore
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Permeability and contractile responses of collecting lymphatic vessels elicited by atrial and brain natriuretic peptides.

Authors:  Joshua P Scallan; Michael J Davis; Virginia H Huxley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Maximum shortening velocity of lymphatic muscle approaches that of striated muscle.

Authors:  Rongzhen Zhang; Anne I Taucer; Anatoliy A Gashev; Mariappan Muthuchamy; David C Zawieja; Michael J Davis
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 6.  Imaging the lymphatic system.

Authors:  Lance L Munn; Timothy P Padera
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.514

7.  Mesenteric lymphatic vessels adapt to mesenteric venous hypertension by becoming weaker pumps.

Authors:  R M Dongaonkar; T L Nguyen; C M Quick; C L Heaps; J Hardy; G A Laine; E Wilson; R H Stewart
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  The relationship between lymphangion chain length and maximum pressure generation established through in vivo imaging and computational modeling.

Authors:  Mohammad S Razavi; Tyler S Nelson; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Rudolph L Gleason; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.733

9.  Mechanisms of Connexin-Related Lymphedema.

Authors:  Jorge A Castorena-Gonzalez; Scott D Zawieja; Min Li; R Sathish Srinivasan; Alexander M Simon; Cor de Wit; Roger de la Torre; Luis A Martinez-Lemus; Grant W Hennig; Michael J Davis
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Lymphatic muscle cells in rat mesenteric lymphatic vessels of various ages.

Authors:  Eric A Bridenbaugh; Irina Tsoy Nizamutdinova; Daniel Jupiter; Takashi Nagai; Sangeetha Thangaswamy; Victor Chatterjee; Anatoliy A Gashev
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.589

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.