Literature DB >> 26747076

Effect of the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act on the Nutritional Quality of Meals Selected by Students and School Lunch Participation Rates.

Donna B Johnson1, Mary Podrabsky1, Anita Rocha1, Jennifer J Otten1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Effective policies have potential to improve diet and reduce obesity. School food policies reach most children in the United States.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the nutritional quality of foods chosen by students and meal participation rates before and after the implementation of new school meal standards authorized through the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This descriptive, longitudinal study examined changes in the nutritional quality of 1,741,630 school meals at 3 middle schools and 3 high schools in an urban school district in Washington state. Seventy two hundred students are enrolled in the district; 54% are eligible for free and reduced-price meals. Student food selection data were collected daily from January 2011 through January 2014 during the 16 months prior to and the 15 months after implementation of the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act. EXPOSURE: The Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Nutritional quality was assessed by calculating monthly mean adequacy ratio and energy density of the foods selected by students each day. Six nutrients were included in the mean adequacy ratio calculations: calcium, vitamin C, vitamin A, iron, fiber, and protein. Monthly school meal participation was calculated as the mean number of daily meals served divided by student enrollment. Mean monthly values of mean adequacy ratio, energy density, and participation were compared before and after policy implementation.
RESULTS: After implementation of the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act, change was associated with significant improvement in the nutritional quality of foods chosen by students, as measured by increased mean adequacy ratio from a mean of 58.7 (range, 49.6-63.1) prior to policy implementation to 75.6 (range, 68.7-81.8) after policy implementation and decreased energy density from a mean of 1.65 (range, 1.53-1.82) to 1.44 (range, 1.29-1.61), respectively. There was negligible difference in student meal participation following implementation of the new meal standards with 47% meal participation (range, 40.4%-49.5%) meal participation prior to the implemented policy and 46% participation (range, 39.1%-48.2%) afterward. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Food policy in the form of improved nutrition standards was associated with the selection of foods that are higher in nutrients that are of importance in adolescence and lower in energy density. Implementation of the new meal standards was not associated with a negative effect on student meal participation. In this district, meal standards effectively changed the quality of foods selected by children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26747076     DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.3918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Pediatr        ISSN: 2168-6203            Impact factor:   16.193


  23 in total

1.  Primer on US Food and Nutrition Policy and Public Health: Protect School Nutrition Standards.

Authors:  Marlene B Schwartz; Kelly D Brownell; D Lee Miller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  School Food and Physical Activity Environment: A Longitudinal Analysis of Four School Districts in New Jersey.

Authors:  Francesco Acciai; Michael J Yedidia; Robin S DeWeese; Sarah Martinelli; Punam Ohri-Vachaspati
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Impact of the 2010 US Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act on School Breakfast and Lunch Participation Rates Between 2008 and 2015.

Authors:  Nicole Vaudrin; Kristen Lloyd; Michael J Yedidia; Michael Todd; Punam Ohri-Vachaspati
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The New school food standards and nutrition of school children: Direct and Indirect Effect Analysis.

Authors:  Pourya Valizadeh; Shu Wen Ng
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.184

5.  Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Healthy Eating and School Lunch Meals among Adolescents: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Denise D Payán; David C Sloane; Jacqueline Illum; Tahirah Farris; LaVonna B Lewis
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2017-09-01

6.  Percentage of Youth Meeting Federal Fruit and Vegetable Intake Recommendations, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, United States and 33 States, 2013.

Authors:  Latetia V Moore; Frances E Thompson; Zewditu Demissie
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.910

7.  Student Perception of Healthfulness, School Lunch Healthfulness, and Participation in School Lunch: The Healthy Communities Study.

Authors:  Marisa Tsai; Lorrene D Ritchie; Punam Ohri-Vachaspati; Lauren E Au
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.045

8.  School Food and Beverage Availability and Children's Diet, Purchasing, and Obesity: Evidence From a Natural Experiment.

Authors:  Andrea S Richardson; Nancy Nicosia; Madhumita B Ghosh-Dastidar; Ashlesha Datar
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.012

9.  Perceptions of Processed Foods Among Low-Income and Immigrant Parents.

Authors:  Rachel Bleiweiss-Sande; Jeanne Goldberg; E Whitney Evans; Kenneth Chui; Jennifer Sacheck
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2019-10-29

10.  Parental Perceptions of the Nutritional Quality of School Meals and Student Meal Participation: Before and After the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act.

Authors:  Sarah Martinelli; Francesco Acciai; Lauren E Au; Michael J Yedidia; Punam Ohri-Vachaspati
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.