Literature DB >> 32654886

Parental Perceptions of the Nutritional Quality of School Meals and Student Meal Participation: Before and After the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act.

Sarah Martinelli1, Francesco Acciai1, Lauren E Au2, Michael J Yedidia3, Punam Ohri-Vachaspati4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine (1) parental perceptions of school meals and (2) student meal participation before and after the implementation of the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act (HHFKA).
DESIGN: Data were collected from telephone surveys of 2 independent cross-sectional panels in New Jersey (2009-2010 and 2016-2017). PARTICIPANTS: Households with children aged 7-18 years (pre-HHFKA: n = 1,027; post-HHFKA: n = 324). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Parental perception of school meals and parental reports of student participation in school meals. ANALYSIS: Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to examine outcome variables. For school meal participation, nested models were analyzed first controlling for sociodemographic variables, followed by parental perception, and then the interaction between perception and time.
RESULTS: Parental perceptions of school meals did not change significantly after the HHFKA. At both time points, school meal participation rates were significantly higher for children of parents who perceived school meals as healthy compared with children whose parents perceived meals to be unhealthy (pre-HHFKA: 89.9% vs 75.1%, P < 0.001; post-HHFKA: 87.3% vs 64.9%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Because higher perception of school meal quality is associated with higher participation, it is important for school food programs to inform parents about the improved nutritional quality of school meals.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act; National School Lunch Program; nutrition policy; parents; perception

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32654886      PMCID: PMC8725065          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav        ISSN: 1499-4046            Impact factor:   3.045


  19 in total

1.  Autonomy and control: the co-construction of adolescent food choice.

Authors:  Raewyn Bassett; Gwen E Chapman; Brenda L Beagan
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Looking cool or attaining self-rule. Different motives for autonomy and their effects on unhealthy snack purchase.

Authors:  F Marijn Stok; Denise T D De Ridder; Marieke A Adriaanse; John B F De Wit
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Community eligibility and other provisions for universal free meals at school: impact on student breakfast and lunch participation in California public schools.

Authors:  Lindsey Turner; Joanne F Guthrie; Katherine Ralston
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  The New Federal School Nutrition Standards and Meal Patterns: Early Evidence Examining the Influence on Student Dietary Behavior and the School Food Environment.

Authors:  Karen W Cullen; Jayna M Dave
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 4.910

5.  Impact of the 2010 US Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act on School Breakfast and Lunch Participation Rates Between 2008 and 2015.

Authors:  Nicole Vaudrin; Kristen Lloyd; Michael J Yedidia; Michael Todd; Punam Ohri-Vachaspati
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Student Perception of Healthfulness, School Lunch Healthfulness, and Participation in School Lunch: The Healthy Communities Study.

Authors:  Marisa Tsai; Lorrene D Ritchie; Punam Ohri-Vachaspati; Lauren E Au
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.045

7.  Effects of Offering Look-Alike Products as Smart Snacks in Schools.

Authors:  Jennifer L Harris; Maia Hyary; Marlene B Schwartz
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.992

8.  Effect of the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act on the Nutritional Quality of Meals Selected by Students and School Lunch Participation Rates.

Authors:  Donna B Johnson; Mary Podrabsky; Anita Rocha; Jennifer J Otten
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 16.193

9.  Participation in the national school lunch program: importance of school-level and neighborhood contextual factors.

Authors:  Donka M Mirtcheva; Lisa M Powell
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.118

10.  New school meal regulations increase fruit consumption and do not increase total plate waste.

Authors:  Marlene B Schwartz; Kathryn E Henderson; Margaret Read; Nicole Danna; Jeannette R Ickovics
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 2.992

View more
  1 in total

1.  Association of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 With Body Mass Trajectories of Children in Low-Income Families.

Authors:  Andrea S Richardson; Margaret M Weden; Irineo Cabreros; Ashlesha Datar
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-05-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.