Literature DB >> 26746828

Hemodynamic alterations after stent implantation in 15 cases of intracranial aneurysm.

Chao Wang1, Zhongbin Tian1, Jian Liu1, Linkai Jing1, Nikhil Paliwal2,3, Shengzhang Wang4, Ying Zhang1, Jianping Xiang2,3,5, Adnan H Siddiqui2,5,6, Hui Meng2,3,5, Xinjian Yang7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stent-assisted coiling technology has been widely used in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. In the current study, we investigated the intra-aneurysmal hemodynamic alterations after stent implantation and their association with the aneurysm location.
METHODS: We first retrospectively studied 15 aneurysm cases [8 internal carotid artery-ophthalmic artery (ICA-OphA) aneurysms and 7 posterior communicating artery (PcoA) aneurysms] treated with Enterprise stents and coils. Then, based on the patient-specific geometries before and after stenting, we built virtual stenting computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation models.
RESULTS: Before and after the stent deployment, the average wall shear stress (WSS) on the aneurysmal sac at systolic peak changed from 7.04 Pa (4.14 Pa, 15.77 Pa) to 6.04 Pa (3.86 Pa, 11.13 Pa), P = 0.001; the spatially averaged flow velocity in the perpendicular plane of the aneurysm dropped from 0.5 m/s (0.28 m/s, 0.7 m/s) to 0.33 m/s (0.25 m/s, 0.49 m/s), P = 0.001, respectively. Post stent implantation, the WSS in ICA-OphA aneurysms and PcoA aneurysms decreased by 14.4 % (P = 0.012) and 16.6 % (P = 0.018), respectively, and the flow velocity also reduced by 10.3 % (P = 0.029) and 10.5 % (P = 0.013), respectively. Changes in the WSS, flow velocity, and pressure were not significantly different between ICA-OphA and PcoA aneurysms (P > 0.05). Stent implantation did not significantly change the peak systolic pressure in either aneurysm type.
CONCLUSION: After the stent implantation, both the intra-aneurysmal flow velocity and WSS decreased independently of aneurysm type (ICA-OphA and PcoA). Little change was observed in peak systolic pressure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemodynamics; Intracranial aneurysm; Pressure; Stent; Velocity; Wall shear stress

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26746828      PMCID: PMC4918465          DOI: 10.1007/s00701-015-2696-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  27 in total

Review 1.  Intracranial aneurysms: from vessel wall pathology to therapeutic approach.

Authors:  Timo Krings; Daniel M Mandell; Tim-Rasmus Kiehl; Sasikhan Geibprasert; Michael Tymianski; Hortensia Alvarez; Karel G terBrugge; Franz-Josef Hans
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Characterization of critical hemodynamics contributing to aneurysmal remodeling at the basilar terminus in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Eleni Metaxa; Markus Tremmel; Sabareesh K Natarajan; Jianping Xiang; Rocco A Paluch; Max Mandelbaum; Adnan H Siddiqui; John Kolega; J Mocco; Hui Meng
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Stents for intracranial wide-necked aneurysms: more than mechanical protection.

Authors:  Isabel Wanke; Michael Forsting
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Deployment of self-expandable stents in aneurysmatic cerebral vessels: comparison of different computational approaches for interventional planning.

Authors:  A Bernardini; I Larrabide; L Petrini; G Pennati; E Flore; M Kim; A F Frangi
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 1.763

5.  Fast virtual deployment of self-expandable stents: method and in vitro evaluation for intracranial aneurysmal stenting.

Authors:  Ignacio Larrabide; Minsuok Kim; Luca Augsburger; Maria Cruz Villa-Uriol; Daniel Rüfenacht; Alejandro F Frangi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms using the Solitaire™ AB Neurovascular Remodeling Device: initial and midterm follow-up results.

Authors:  Christin Clajus; Vojtech Sychra; Christoph Strasilla; Joachim Klisch
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Stent-associated flow remodeling causes further occlusion of incompletely coiled aneurysms.

Authors:  Matthew F Lawson; William C Newman; Yueh-Yun Chi; J D Mocco; Brian L Hoh
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Influence of different computational approaches for stent deployment on cerebral aneurysm haemodynamics.

Authors:  Annarita Bernardini; Ignacio Larrabide; Hernán G Morales; Giancarlo Pennati; Lorenza Petrini; Salvatore Cito; Alejandro F Frangi
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 9.  A combination of genetic, molecular and haemodynamic risk factors contributes to the formation, enlargement and rupture of brain aneurysms.

Authors:  Sheila E Francis; Jian Tu; Yi Qian; Alberto P Avolio
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 10.  Stent-assisted coiling versus coiling in treatment of intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuan Hong; Yong-Jie Wang; Zheng Deng; Qun Wu; Jian-Min Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evidence for non-Newtonian behavior of intracranial blood flow from Doppler ultrasonography measurements.

Authors:  Khalid M Saqr; Ossama Mansour; Simon Tupin; Tamer Hassan; Makoto Ohta
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Combined use of a pCONus and a Solitaire stent: Report of two cases.

Authors:  Pervinder Bhogal; Marta Aguilar Pérez; Rosa Martinez Moreno; Marcin Miś; Maciej Miś; Hans Henkes
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Association between hemodynamic modifications and clinical outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverters.

Authors:  Nikhil Paliwal; Robert J Damiano; Jason M Davies; Adnan H Siddiqui; Hui Meng
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-03-03

4.  Hemodynamic differences by increasing low profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) stent local compaction across intracranial aneurysm orifice.

Authors:  Zhongbin Tian; Mingqi Zhang; Gaohui Li; Rongbo Jin; Xiaochang Leng; Ying Zhang; Kun Wang; Yisen Zhang; Xinjian Yang; Jianping Xiang; Jian Liu
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  A New Imaging Tool for Realtime Measurement of Flow Velocity in Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Athanasios K Petridis; Marius Kaschner; Jan F Cornelius; Marcel A Kamp; Angelo Tortora; Hans-Jakob Steiger; Bernd Turowski
Journal:  Clin Pract       Date:  2017-08-03

Review 6.  Endovascular stent-induced alterations in host artery mechanical environments and their roles in stent restenosis and late thrombosis.

Authors:  Jinxuan Wang; Xuepu Jin; Yuhua Huang; Xiaolin Ran; Desha Luo; Dongchuan Yang; Dongyu Jia; Kang Zhang; Jianhua Tong; Xiaoyan Deng; Guixue Wang
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2018-05-02

7.  Hemodynamic Effect of the Last Finishing Coils in Packing the Aneurysm Neck.

Authors:  Hailin Wan; Gang Lu; Lei Huang; Liang Ge; Yeqing Jiang; Gaohui Li; Xiaochang Leng; Jianping Xiang; Xiaolong Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Hemodynamic analysis and implantation strategies of delayed intracranial aneurysm rupture after flow diverter treatment.

Authors:  Shiyao Chen; Bin Bai; Nan Lv; Yunzhang Cheng; Bin Ji
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-12

9.  Numerical Assessment of the Risk of Abnormal Endothelialization for Diverter Devices: Clinical Data Driven Numerical Study.

Authors:  Denis Tikhvinskii; Julia Kuianova; Dmitrii Kislitsin; Kirill Orlov; Anton Gorbatykh; Daniil Parshin
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-18

10.  Risk factors for repeated recurrence of cerebral aneurysms treated with endovascular embolization.

Authors:  Yong-Feng Han; Peng Jiang; Zhong-Bin Tian; Xi-Heng Chen; Jian Liu; Zhong-Xue Wu; Bu-Lang Gao; Chun-Feng Ren
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.086

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.