Literature DB >> 32830566

Hemodynamic differences by increasing low profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) stent local compaction across intracranial aneurysm orifice.

Zhongbin Tian1, Mingqi Zhang1, Gaohui Li2, Rongbo Jin2, Xiaochang Leng2, Ying Zhang1, Kun Wang1, Yisen Zhang1, Xinjian Yang1, Jianping Xiang2, Jian Liu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support device (LVIS) has been successfully used to treat cerebral aneurysm, and the push-pull technique has been used clinically to compact the stent across aneurysm orifice. Our aim was to exhibit the hemodynamic effect of the compacted LVIS stent.
METHODS: Two patient-specific aneurysm models were constructed from three-dimensional angiographic images. The uniform LVIS stent, compacted LVIS and Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) with or without coil embolization were virtually deployed into aneurysm models to perform hemodynamic analysis. Intra-aneurysmal flow parameters were calculated to assess hemodynamic differences among different models.
RESULTS: The compacted LVIS had the highest metal coverage across the aneurysm orifice (case 1, 46.37%; case 2, 67.01%). However, the PED achieved the highest pore density (case 1, 19.56 pores/mm2; case 2, 18.07 pores/mm2). The compacted LVIS produced a much higher intra-aneurysmal flow reduction than the uniform LVIS. The PED showed a higher intra-aneurysmal flow reduction than the compacted LVIS in case 1, but the results were comparable in case 2. After stent placement, the intra-aneurysmal flow was further reduced as subsequent coil embolization. The compacted LVIS stent with coils produced a similar reduction in intra-aneurysmal flow to that of the PED.
CONCLUSIONS: The combined characteristics of stent metal coverage and pore density should be considered when assessing the flow diversion effects of stents. More intra-aneurysmal flow reductions could be introduced by compacted LVIS stent than the uniform one. Compared with PED, compacted LVIS stent may exhibit a flow-diverting effect comparable to that of the PED.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemodynamics; aneurysms; flow diversion; low-profile visualized intraluminal support device (LVIS); push-pull technique

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32830566      PMCID: PMC7645191          DOI: 10.1177/1591019920952903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  29 in total

1.  Low-profile visible intraluminal support device: immediate outcome of the first three US cases.

Authors:  Raymond D Turner; Aquilla Turk; Imran Chaudry
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 5.836

2.  Increasing flow diversion for cerebral aneurysm treatment using a single flow diverter.

Authors:  Jianping Xiang; Ding Ma; Kenneth V Snyder; Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui; Hui Meng
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 3.  Utility of bulging technique for endovascular treatment of small and wide-necked aneurysms with a Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS Jr.) device: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Akihiro Inoue; Masahiko Tagawa; Shirabe Matsumoto; Masahiro Nishikawa; Kosuke Kusakabe; Hideaki Watanabe; Takeharu Kunieda
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  In vitro angiographic comparison of the flow-diversion performance of five neurovascular stents.

Authors:  Ronak J Dholakia; Ari D Kappel; Andrew Pagano; Henry H Woo; Baruch B Lieber; David J Fiorella; Chander Sadasivan
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Impact of stents and flow diverters on hemodynamics in idealized aneurysm models.

Authors:  Santhosh Seshadhri; Gábor Janiga; Oliver Beuing; Martin Skalej; Dominique Thévenin
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Compacting a Single Flow Diverter versus Overlapping Flow Diverters for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Computational Study.

Authors:  R J Damiano; V M Tutino; N Paliwal; D Ma; J M Davies; A H Siddiqui; H Meng
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Hemodynamic alterations after stent implantation in 15 cases of intracranial aneurysm.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Zhongbin Tian; Jian Liu; Linkai Jing; Nikhil Paliwal; Shengzhang Wang; Ying Zhang; Jianping Xiang; Adnan H Siddiqui; Hui Meng; Xinjian Yang
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Flow Diversion with Low-Profile Braided Stents for the Treatment of Very Small or Uncoilable Intracranial Aneurysms at or Distal to the Circle of Willis.

Authors:  K Aydin; M Barburoglu; S Sencer; M Berdikhojayev; B Coskun; S Akpek
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Comparison of flow diversion and coiling in large unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms.

Authors:  Nohra Chalouhi; Stavropoula Tjoumakaris; Robert M Starke; L Fernando Gonzalez; Ciro Randazzo; David Hasan; Jeffrey F McMahon; Saurabh Singhal; Lea A Moukarzel; Aaron S Dumont; Robert Rosenwasser; Pascal Jabbour
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Numerical simulation of patient-specific endovascular stenting and coiling for intracranial aneurysm surgical planning.

Authors:  Xiaochang Leng; Yang Wang; Jing Xu; Yeqing Jiang; Xiaolong Zhang; Jianping Xiang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 5.531

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of the Shelving Technique on the Outcome of Embolization in Intracranial Bifurcation Aneurysms.

Authors:  F Çay; A Arat
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.966

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.