Literature DB >> 26744287

Combined supine and prone imaging acquisition in cardiac SPECT: A turn for the better.

Mylan C Cohen1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 26744287     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-015-0389-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  17 in total

1.  Combined supine and prone quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT: method development and clinical validation in patients with no known coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Hidetaka Nishina; Piotr J Slomka; Aiden Abidov; Shunichi Yoda; Cigdem Akincioglu; Xingping Kang; Ishac Cohen; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Europe 2007: a survey of the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology.

Authors:  Eliana Reyes; Susanna Wiener; S Richard Underwood
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  2013 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology / MedAxiom Nuclear Survey.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Improved specificity of prone versus supine thallium SPECT imaging.

Authors:  G M Segall; M J Davis; M L Goris
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 7.794

5.  Comparative accuracy of supine-only and combined supine-prone myocardial perfusion imaging in men.

Authors:  Vicente Taasan; Anita Wokhlu; Michael V Taasan; Raman S Dusaj; Ajay Mehta; Steven Kraft; David Winchester; David Wymer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Stress only myocardial perfusion imaging: Is it time for a change?

Authors:  John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Two-position supine/prone myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) imaging improves visual inter-observer correlation and agreement.

Authors:  Reza Arsanjani; Sean W Hayes; Mathews Fish; Aryeh Shalev; Rine Nakanishi; Louise E J Thomson; John D Friedman; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman; Piotr Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Prone versus supine thallium myocardial SPECT: a method to decrease artifactual inferior wall defects.

Authors:  G M Segall; M J Davis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  CT-based attenuation correction versus prone imaging to decrease equivocal interpretations of rest/stress Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT MPI.

Authors:  Dee Malkerneker; Reuven Brenner; William H Martin; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Irene D Feurer; Marvin W Kronenberg; Dominique Delbeke
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure.

Authors:  Su Min Chang; Faisal Nabi; Jiaqiong Xu; Umara Raza; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 24.094
View more
  2 in total

1.  Contemporary Cardiac SPECT Imaging-Innovations and Best Practices: An Information Statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Authors:  Brian G Abbott; James A Case; Sharmila Dorbala; Andrew J Einstein; James R Galt; Robert Pagnanelli; Renée P Bullock-Palmer; Prem Soman; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Reducing radiation to patients and improving image quality in a real-world nuclear cardiology laboratory.

Authors:  Stephen A Bloom; Karen Meyers
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.952
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.