Literature DB >> 26743929

Comparing Image Perception of Bladder Tumors in Four Different Storz Professional Image Enhancement System Modalities Using the íSPIES App.

Guido M Kamphuis1, D Martijn de Bruin1,2, Martin J Brandt2, Thomas Knoll3, Pierre Conort4, Alberto Lapini5, Jose L Dominguez-Escrig6, Jean J M C H de la Rosette1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the variation of interpretation of the same bladder urothelium image in different Storz Professional Image Enhancement System (SPIES) modalities. SPIES contains a White light (WL), Spectra A (SA), Spectra B (SB), and Clara and Chroma combined (CC) modality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An App for the iPAD retina was developed to study evaluation of images. A total of 80 images from 20 bladder areas acquired in four modalities were included. Seventy-three participants completed the study. Images were analyzed on differences in delineated tumor margin variation, perceived quality of the image, and delineation time.
RESULTS: A separation between high agreement (n = 14) and low agreement (n = 6) images was found. In high agreement images, no difference in root mean square (RMS) was found between modalities. In low agreement images, WL (26.5 pixels) and SA (33.4 pixels) had a higher RMS than CC (18 pixels) and SB (21.4 pixels). The quality of SPIES modalities images was rated significantly higher. Delineation time was similar.
CONCLUSION: In low agreement cases, images in CC and SB have less variation in interpretation than WL and SA. The image quality in SPIES modalities is graded significantly higher than WL. There is no difference in delineation time between modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26743929     DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  10 in total

Review 1.  Which flexible ureteroscope is the best for upper tract urothelial carcinoma treatment?

Authors:  Etienne Xavier Keller; Steeve Doizi; Luca Villa; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Enhanced Endoscopy in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Shane Pearce; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  [Enhanced imaging in urological endoscopy].

Authors:  M C Kriegmair; S Hein; D S Schoeb; H Zappe; R Suárez-Ibarrola; F Waldbillig; B Gruene; P-F Pohlmann; F Praus; K Wilhelm; C Gratzke; A Miernik; C Bolenz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Conventional white light imaging-assisted transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) versus IMAGE1S-assisted TURBT in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients: trial protocol and 18 months results.

Authors:  Jean de la Rosette; Alexey Martov; Rodolfo Hurle; Gabriel Favre; Charalampos Mamoulakis; Manuel Castanheira de Oliveira; Arnulf Stenzl; Estefania Linares-Espinós; Carlos R Trelles Guzmán; Stavros Gravas; Thomas Knoll; Mustafa Yucel Boz; Thomas Herrmann; Pilar Laguna
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Novel real-time optical imaging modalities for the detection of neoplastic lesions in urology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Oliver Brunckhorst; Qi Jia Ong; Daniel Elson; Erik Mayer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018 aspects of diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Grzegorz Fojecki; Anders Magnusson; Olivier Traxer; Joyce Baard; Palle Jörn Sloth Osther; Georg Jaremko; Christian Seitz; Thomas Knoll; Guido Giusti; Marianne Brehmer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Clinically Available Optical Imaging Technologies in Endoscopic Lesion Detection: Current Status and Future Perspective.

Authors:  Zhongyu He; Peng Wang; Yuelong Liang; Zuoming Fu; Xuesong Ye
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.682

8.  [Transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT)].

Authors:  D Oswald; M Pallauf; T R W Herrmann; C Netsch; B Becker; K Lehrich; A Miernik; D S Schöb; K D Sievert; A J Gross; J Westphal; L Lusuardi; S Deininger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Role of Macroscopic Image Enhancement in Diagnosis of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: An Analytical Review.

Authors:  Prashant Motiram Mulawkar; Gyanendra Sharma; Ashwin Tamhankar; Utsav Shah; Rickaz Raheem
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-21

Review 10.  Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: update and perspective in developing countries. A narrative review.

Authors:  Eduardo Mazzucchi; Giovanni Scala Marchini; Fernanda Christina Gabrigna Berto; John Denstedt; Alexandre Danilovic; Fabio Carvalho Vicentini; Fabio Cesar Miranda Torricelli; Carlos Alfredo Battagello; Miguel Srougi; William Carlos Nahas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.050

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.