Melanie Sloan1, Katarzyna A Campbell2, Katharine Bowker2, Tim Coleman3, Sue Cooper2, Barbara Brafman-Price4, Felix Naughton4. 1. Behavioural Science Group, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; mas229@medschl.cam.ac.uk. 2. Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; 3. Division of Primary Care, D1411, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom. 4. Behavioural Science Group, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom;
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Smoking in pregnancy remains an important and costly public health concern with policy makers worldwide researching methods to aid cessation. UK government guidelines recommend implementation of an "opt-out" (ie, whether requested or not) referral pathway for pregnant smokers to specialist smoking cessation support using carbon monoxide (CO) screening. This study explores the views of pregnant smokers who experienced this new pathway in one UK hospital trust. METHODS: Eighteen semi-structured telephone interviews with women who experienced the opt-out pathway were undertaken. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Three themes were identified relating to expectations, acceptability and impact of the pathway. Women were generally very accepting of the CO testing especially when it met their prior expectations and was perceived as being a routine component of antenatal care. They considered the visual feedback from the CO monitoring improved their motivation to quit. Views on the automatic referral for cessation support were divided with questions raised as to the removal of choice, with many women also expressing dissatisfaction about perceived lack of contact by Stop Smoking Services (SSS) following referral. CONCLUSION: The opt-out pathway is potentially an acceptable addition to current practice. The women considered CO monitoring to be the most valuable element of the pathway. Women keen to engage with SSS desired a more efficient system of contact. IMPLICATIONS: This study presents a unique insight into pregnant women's views on the implementation of opt-out referrals for smoking cessation. Introducing CO testing and opt-out referrals at the time of antenatal ultrasound examination can potentially increase motivation to stop smoking in pregnancy. The findings demonstrate that facilitating access to SSS was not always achieved, and further refinement is needed to ensure more effective contact procedures. Ensuring all women are fully informed prior to the CO testing may further improve both the impact of the opt-out referral pathway and the chance of successfully engaging with SSS.
INTRODUCTION: Smoking in pregnancy remains an important and costly public health concern with policy makers worldwide researching methods to aid cessation. UK government guidelines recommend implementation of an "opt-out" (ie, whether requested or not) referral pathway for pregnant smokers to specialist smoking cessation support using carbon monoxide (CO) screening. This study explores the views of pregnant smokers who experienced this new pathway in one UK hospital trust. METHODS: Eighteen semi-structured telephone interviews with women who experienced the opt-out pathway were undertaken. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Three themes were identified relating to expectations, acceptability and impact of the pathway. Women were generally very accepting of the CO testing especially when it met their prior expectations and was perceived as being a routine component of antenatal care. They considered the visual feedback from the CO monitoring improved their motivation to quit. Views on the automatic referral for cessation support were divided with questions raised as to the removal of choice, with many women also expressing dissatisfaction about perceived lack of contact by Stop Smoking Services (SSS) following referral. CONCLUSION: The opt-out pathway is potentially an acceptable addition to current practice. The women considered CO monitoring to be the most valuable element of the pathway. Women keen to engage with SSS desired a more efficient system of contact. IMPLICATIONS: This study presents a unique insight into pregnant women's views on the implementation of opt-out referrals for smoking cessation. Introducing CO testing and opt-out referrals at the time of antenatal ultrasound examination can potentially increase motivation to stop smoking in pregnancy. The findings demonstrate that facilitating access to SSS was not always achieved, and further refinement is needed to ensure more effective contact procedures. Ensuring all women are fully informed prior to the CO testing may further improve both the impact of the opt-out referral pathway and the chance of successfully engaging with SSS.
Authors: C Lerman; K Gold; J Audrain; T H Lin; N R Boyd; C T Orleans; B Wilfond; G Louben; N Caporaso Journal: Health Psychol Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Katarzyna Anna Campbell; Katharine Anna Bowker; Felix Naughton; Melanie Sloan; Sue Cooper; Tim Coleman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Cole Buchanan; Georges J Nahhas; Constance Guille; K Michael Cummings; Cameron Wheeler; Erin A McClure Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2017-09
Authors: Katarzyna A Campbell; Libby Fergie; Tom Coleman-Haynes; Sue Cooper; Fabiana Lorencatto; Michael Ussher; Jane Dyas; Tim Coleman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-02-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Felix Naughton; Luis Reeves Vaz; Tim Coleman; Sophie Orton; Katharine Bowker; Jo Leonardi-Bee; Sue Cooper; Laura Vanderbloemen; Stephen Sutton; Michael Ussher Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Katarzyna Anna Campbell; Katharine Anna Bowker; Felix Naughton; Melanie Sloan; Sue Cooper; Tim Coleman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Felix Naughton; Sarah Hopewell; Lesley Sinclair; Dorothy McCaughan; Jennifer McKell; Linda Bauld Journal: Br J Health Psychol Date: 2018-05-15
Authors: Fizzah B Abidi; Libby Laing; Sue Cooper; Tim Coleman; Katarzyna A Campbell Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-22 Impact factor: 3.390