Literature DB >> 9989319

Accuracy of smokers' risk perceptions.

N D Weinstein1.   

Abstract

In response to disagreements about the extent to which smokers recognize the full risk of smoking-induced illness, an attempt was made to review all articles that have investigated smokers' risk perceptions. These diverse studies are grouped here into four categories, depending on the type of risk judgment solicited by researchers. This grouping shows that the apparent underestimation or overestimation of risk depends on how risk perceptions are assessed. No single conclusion about the accuracy of smokers' numerical risk estimates is possible since the accuracy depends entirely on the health outcome rated (e.g. lung cancer versus all deaths due to smoking). With other types of risk questions, smokers consistently acknowledge that smoking increases health risks, but they judge the size of these increases to be smaller and less well-established than do non-smokers. Finally, smokers minimize the personal relevance of the risks: they do not believe that they are as much at risk as other smokers of becoming addicted or suffering health effects. The accumulated data indicate that smokers continue to minimize their personal health risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9989319     DOI: 10.1007/BF02884459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  68 in total

Review 1.  The economics of global tobacco control.

Authors:  P Jha; F J Chaloupka
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-05

2.  Risk involvement and risk perception among adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Rebecca J Johnson; Kevin D McCaul; William M P Klein
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2002-02

3.  Risk perceptions and family history of lung cancer: differences by smoking status.

Authors:  L S Chen; K A Kaphingst
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Identifying barriers to Papanicolaou smear screening in Korean women: Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005.

Authors:  Su Jeong Park; Woong-Sub Park
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  Food and Drug Administration tobacco regulation and product judgments.

Authors:  Annette R Kaufman; Lila J Finney Rutten; Mark Parascandola; Kelly D Blake; Erik M Augustson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

Authors:  D Hammond; G T Fong; A McNeill; R Borland; K M Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Risk perception and smoking behavior in medically ill smokers: a prospective study.

Authors:  Belinda Borrelli; Rashelle B Hayes; Shira Dunsiger; Joseph L Fava
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 8.  Framing tobacco control efforts within an ethical context.

Authors:  B J Fox
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Young smokers' interpretations of the estimated lung cancer risk associated with a common genetic variant of low penetrance.

Authors:  S C Sanderson; C M McBride; S C O'Neill; S Docherty; J Shepperd; I M Lipkus
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines for U.S. women aged 25-64: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).

Authors:  Wendy Nelson; Richard P Moser; Allison Gaffey; William Waldron
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.