Literature DB >> 9028818

Incorporating biomarkers of exposure and genetic susceptibility into smoking cessation treatment: effects on smoking-related cognitions, emotions, and behavior change.

C Lerman1, K Gold, J Audrain, T H Lin, N R Boyd, C T Orleans, B Wilfond, G Louben, N Caporaso.   

Abstract

In this article the authors report on the short-term impact of incorporating biomarker feedback about exposure and genetic susceptibility into minimal-contact quit-smoking counseling (QSC). Four hundred and twenty-seven smokers were randomized to 1 of 3 treatments: (a) QSC, (b) QSC + exposure biomarker feedback (EBF) about carbon monoxide in exhaled breath, or (b) QSC + EBF + biomarker feedback about genetic susceptibility to lung cancer (SBF). We observed significant immediate positive effects of SBF, compared with EBF and QSC on perceived risk, perceived quitting benefits, and fear arousal. However, at the 2-month follow-up, there were no group differences in quit rates. SBF did lead to significant reductions in the number of cigarettes smoked for smokers who were in the preparation stage. Smokers in the EBF and QSC conditions showed reductions in depressive symptoms by 2 months, but smokers in the SBF condition did not. In the context of QSC, genetic feedback may heighten vulnerability and possibly promote distress, but may not immediately enhance quitting in most smokers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9028818     DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.16.1.87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  42 in total

Review 1.  Genetic risk and behavioural change.

Authors:  T M Marteau; C Lerman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-28

Review 2.  Genetic testing for lung cancer risk: if physicians can do it, should they?

Authors:  Theodore W Marcy; Michael Stefanek; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Risk perceptions and family history of lung cancer: differences by smoking status.

Authors:  L S Chen; K A Kaphingst
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: a case study and practical recommendations for “genomic counseling”.

Authors:  Amy C Sturm; Kandamurugu Manickam
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Learning one's genetic risk changes physiology independent of actual genetic risk.

Authors:  Bradley P Turnwald; J Parker Goyer; Danielle Z Boles; Amy Silder; Scott L Delp; Alia J Crum
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-12-10

6.  Young smokers' interpretations of the estimated lung cancer risk associated with a common genetic variant of low penetrance.

Authors:  S C Sanderson; C M McBride; S C O'Neill; S Docherty; J Shepperd; I M Lipkus
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Immediate and short-term impact of a brief motivational smoking intervention using a biomedical risk assessment: the Get PHIT trial.

Authors:  Jennifer B McClure; Evette Ludman; Lou Grothaus; Chester Pabiniak; Julie Richards; Amy Mohelnitzky
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Behavioral and psychosocial responses to genomic testing for colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Kara-Grace Leventhal; Rachel Nusbaum; Yasmin Salehizadeh; Gillian W Hooker; Beth N Peshkin; Morgan Butrick; William Tuong; Jeena Mathew; David Goerlitz; Mary B Fishman; Peter G Shields; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 5.736

9.  Explaining behavior change after genetic testing: the problem of collinearity between test results and risk estimates.

Authors:  Thomas R Fanshawe; A Toby Prevost; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green; David Armstrong; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2008-09

Review 10.  Public health genomics and genetic test evaluation: the challenge of conducting behavioural research on the utility of lifestyle-genetic tests.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Jane Wardle; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics       Date:  2008-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.