Auden C McClure1, Susanne E Tanski2, Zhigang Li3, Kristina Jackson4, Matthis Morgenstern5, Zhongze Li6, James D Sargent2. 1. Departments of Pediatrics, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire Cancer Control Research Program, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire auden.c.mcclure@hitchcock.org. 2. Departments of Pediatrics, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire Cancer Control Research Program, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. 3. Cancer Epidemiology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. 4. Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and. 5. Institute for Therapy and Health Research, Kiel, Germany. 6. Biostatistics Shared Resources, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire;
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Internet alcohol marketing is not well studied despite its prevalence and potential accessibility and attractiveness to youth. The objective was to examine longitudinal associations between self-reported engagement with Internet alcohol marketing and alcohol use transitions in youth. METHODS: A US sample of 2012 youths aged 15 to 20 was surveyed in 2011. An Internet alcohol marketing receptivity score was developed, based on number of positive responses to seeing alcohol advertising on the Internet, visiting alcohol brand Web sites, being an online alcohol brand fan, and cued recall of alcohol brand home page images. We assessed the association between baseline marketing receptivity and both ever drinking and binge drinking (≥6 drinks per occasion) at 1-year follow-up with multiple logistic regression, controlling for baseline drinking status, Internet use, sociodemographics, personality characteristics, and peer or parent drinking. RESULTS: At baseline, ever-drinking and binge-drinking prevalence was 55% and 27%, respectively. Many (59%) reported seeing Internet alcohol advertising, but few reported going to an alcohol Web site (6%) or being an online fan (3%). Higher Internet use, sensation seeking, having family or peers who drank, and past alcohol use were associated with Internet alcohol marketing receptivity, and a score of 1 or 2 was independently associated with greater adjusted odds of initiating binge drinking (odds ratio 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-2.78 and odds ratio 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.37 respectively) but not with initiation of ever drinking. CONCLUSIONS: Although high levels of engagement with Internet alcohol marketing were uncommon, most underage youths reported seeing it, and we found a prospective association between receptivity to this type of alcohol marketing and future problem drinking, making additional research and ongoing surveillance important.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Internet alcohol marketing is not well studied despite its prevalence and potential accessibility and attractiveness to youth. The objective was to examine longitudinal associations between self-reported engagement with Internet alcohol marketing and alcohol use transitions in youth. METHODS: A US sample of 2012 youths aged 15 to 20 was surveyed in 2011. An Internet alcohol marketing receptivity score was developed, based on number of positive responses to seeing alcohol advertising on the Internet, visiting alcohol brand Web sites, being an online alcohol brand fan, and cued recall of alcohol brand home page images. We assessed the association between baseline marketing receptivity and both ever drinking and binge drinking (≥6 drinks per occasion) at 1-year follow-up with multiple logistic regression, controlling for baseline drinking status, Internet use, sociodemographics, personality characteristics, and peer or parent drinking. RESULTS: At baseline, ever-drinking and binge-drinking prevalence was 55% and 27%, respectively. Many (59%) reported seeing Internet alcohol advertising, but few reported going to an alcohol Web site (6%) or being an online fan (3%). Higher Internet use, sensation seeking, having family or peers who drank, and past alcohol use were associated with Internet alcohol marketing receptivity, and a score of 1 or 2 was independently associated with greater adjusted odds of initiating binge drinking (odds ratio 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-2.78 and odds ratio 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.37 respectively) but not with initiation of ever drinking. CONCLUSIONS: Although high levels of engagement with Internet alcohol marketing were uncommon, most underage youths reported seeing it, and we found a prospective association between receptivity to this type of alcohol marketing and future problem drinking, making additional research and ongoing surveillance important.
Authors: Joy Gabrielli; Zoe L B Brennan; Mike Stoolmiller; Kristina M Jackson; Susanne E Tanski; Auden C McClure Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Tim Janssen; Melissa J Cox; Jennifer E Merrill; Nancy P Barnett; James D Sargent; Kristina M Jackson Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2017-12-18
Authors: Elizabeth J D'Amico; Steven C Martino; Rebecca L Collins; William G Shadel; Anagha Tolpadi; Stephanie Kovalchik; Kirsten M Becker Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2016-11-07
Authors: Auden C McClure; Joy Gabrielli; Samantha Cukier; Kristina M Jackson; Zoe L B Brennan; Susanne E Tanski Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Samantha Cukier; Ashley Wettlaufer; Kristina Jackson; Silvia Minozzi; Bruce D Bartholow; Michael L Stoolmiller; James D Sargent Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-08-13
Authors: Megan A Moreno; Marina Jenkins; Kole Binger; Lauren Kelly; Pamela J Trangenstein; Jennifer M Whitehill; David H Jernigan Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2022-01 Impact factor: 2.582