Piero Rinaldo1, Silvia Tortorelli, Dietrich Matern. 1. Biochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. Rinaldo@mayo.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize recent developments in the field of newborn screening related to the use of tandem mass spectrometry as an analytic platform. RECENT FINDINGS: Novel inborn errors of metabolism with informative amino acid and/or acylcarnitine profiles have been characterized, increasing the complexity of the differential diagnosis of abnormal results. In addition, methods have been developed for the analysis in dried blood spots of steroids and lysosomal enzymes. Previously unrecognized genotype/phenotype correlations have been found among cohorts of patients whose conditions were diagnosed by screening rather than clinically. Several government entities and professional organizations have issued position statements on newborn screening, and worldwide outcome studies continue to underscore the clinical and financial benefits of expanded newborn screening. SUMMARY: Although it is done inconsistently, newborn screening in the United States is undergoing a rapid expansion driven by the introduction of tandem mass spectrometry in at least 34 state programs. This technology is also used to detect disease markers beyond acylcarnitines and amino acids, as both primary and second-tier tests. In addition to analytic improvements, there is a trend toward the development of joint programs not limited to contiguous geographic areas, often based upon public-private partnerships. This review will summarize several new developments in the field that have occurred since early 2003 and will mention others likely to occur in the near future.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize recent developments in the field of newborn screening related to the use of tandem mass spectrometry as an analytic platform. RECENT FINDINGS: Novel inborn errors of metabolism with informative amino acid and/or acylcarnitine profiles have been characterized, increasing the complexity of the differential diagnosis of abnormal results. In addition, methods have been developed for the analysis in dried blood spots of steroids and lysosomal enzymes. Previously unrecognized genotype/phenotype correlations have been found among cohorts of patients whose conditions were diagnosed by screening rather than clinically. Several government entities and professional organizations have issued position statements on newborn screening, and worldwide outcome studies continue to underscore the clinical and financial benefits of expanded newborn screening. SUMMARY: Although it is done inconsistently, newborn screening in the United States is undergoing a rapid expansion driven by the introduction of tandem mass spectrometry in at least 34 state programs. This technology is also used to detect disease markers beyond acylcarnitines and amino acids, as both primary and second-tier tests. In addition to analytic improvements, there is a trend toward the development of joint programs not limited to contiguous geographic areas, often based upon public-private partnerships. This review will summarize several new developments in the field that have occurred since early 2003 and will mention others likely to occur in the near future.
Authors: Jaffar Alfardan; Al-Walid Mohsen; Sara Copeland; Jay Ellison; Laura Keppen-Davis; Marianne Rohrbach; Berkley R Powell; Jane Gillis; Dietrich Matern; Jeffrey Kant; Jerry Vockley Journal: Mol Genet Metab Date: 2010-05-23 Impact factor: 4.797
Authors: Megan A Lewis; Ryan S Paquin; Myra I Roche; Robert D Furberg; Christine Rini; Jonathan S Berg; Cynthia M Powell; Donald B Bailey Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: David P Dimmock; Pamela Trapane; Annette Feigenbaum; Catherine E Keegan; Stephen Cederbaum; James Gibson; Michael J Gambello; Keith Vaux; Patricia Ward; Gregory M Rice; Jon A Wolff; William E O'Brien; Ping Fang Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Laura V Milko; Julianne M O'Daniel; Daniela M DeCristo; Stephanie B Crowley; Ann Katherine M Foreman; Kathleen E Wallace; Lonna F Mollison; Natasha T Strande; Zahra S Girnary; Lacey J Boshe; Arthur S Aylsworth; Muge Gucsavas-Calikoglu; Dianne M Frazier; Neeta L Vora; Myra I Roche; Bradford C Powell; Cynthia M Powell; Jonathan S Berg Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 4.406