Literature DB >> 16845360

Comparison of radiologic signs and clinical symptoms of spinal stenosis.

C Martina Lohman1, Kaj Tallroth, Jyrki A Kettunen, Karl-August Lindgren.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Clinical findings of spinal stenosis were compared to graded radiologic findings of dural sac narrowing.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the changes of the dural sac area of the lumbar spine on computerized tomography (CT) performed without and with axial loading, and study the correlations between the radiologic findings and clinical symptoms suggestive of spinal stenosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although several studies have been performed regarding the advantage of an external compression device in lumbar CT, to our knowledge, none of these studies have correlated radiologic findings with clinical symptoms.
METHODS: The cross-sectional areas of the dural sac at the 3 lowest lumbar intravenous spaces, measured by CT both without and with external compression, were correlated to the clinical symptoms suggestive of spinal stenosis in 117 patients and 351 intervertebral levels.
RESULTS: No statistically significant correlation between the severity of the clinical symptoms of spinal stenosis and dural cross-sectional areas was found. Neither did the use of an external compression device improve the correlation.
CONCLUSION: Although an external compression simulates the dynamic condition in the back during standing position, it does not eliminate the need to compare the radiologic findings with the clinical symptoms of patients examined because of a suspected narrowing of the spinal canal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16845360     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000227370.65573.ac

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  33 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in the dural sac cross-sectional area on axial loaded MR imaging: is there a difference between degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis?

Authors:  H Ozawa; H Kanno; Y Koizumi; N Morozumi; T Aizawa; T Kusakabe; Y Ishii; E Itoi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  The nerve root sedimentation sign for differential diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective, consecutive cohort study.

Authors:  Liangming Zhang; Ruiqiang Chen; Bin Liu; Wei Zhang; Yeqing Zhu; Limin Rong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method.

Authors:  Guen Young Lee; Young Lee Guen; Joon Woo Lee; Woo Lee Joon; Hee Seok Choi; Seok Choi Hee; Kyoung-Jin Oh; Oh Kyoung-Jin; Heung Sik Kang; Sik Kang Heung
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Clinical value of motor evoked potentials with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Xinyu Liu; Shunsuke Konno; Masabumi Miyamoto; Yoshikazu Gembun; Gen Horiguchi; Hiromoto Ito
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Long-term results of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pär Slätis; Antti Malmivaara; Markku Heliövaara; Päivi Sainio; Arto Herno; Jyrki Kankare; Seppo Seitsalo; Kaj Tallroth; Veli Turunen; Paul Knekt; Heikki Hurri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Diagnostic value of the nerve root sedimentation sign, a radiological sign using magnetic resonance imaging, for detecting lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liangming Zhang; Ruiqiang Chen; Peigen Xie; Wei Zhang; Yang Yang; Limin Rong
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for assessing central lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  H-J Park; S S Kim; Y-J Lee; S-Y Lee; N-H Park; Y-J Choi; E-C Chung; M-H Rho
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Influence of catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression on in-hospital opioid consumption, pain, and quality of recovery after adult spine surgery.

Authors:  Lauren K Dunn; Marcel E Durieux; Lucas G Fernández; Siny Tsang; Emily E Smith-Straesser; Hasan F Jhaveri; Shauna P Spanos; Matthew R Thames; Christopher D Spencer; Aaron Lloyd; Russell Stuart; Fan Ye; Jacob P Bray; Edward C Nemergut; Bhiken I Naik
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2017-11-10

Review 9.  The clinical course of pain and disability following surgery for spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Carolina G Fritsch; Manuela L Ferreira; Christopher G Maher; Robert D Herbert; Rafael Z Pinto; Bart Koes; Paulo H Ferreira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Dural sac cross-sectional area and morphological grade show significant associations with patient-rated outcome of surgery for lumbar central spinal stenosis.

Authors:  A F Mannion; T F Fekete; D Pacifico; D O'Riordan; S Nauer; M von Büren; C Schizas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.