| Literature DB >> 26725651 |
B Mitchell1, D Timmerman2, J Poplawsky3, W Zhu2, D Lee2, R Wakamatsu2, J Takatsu2, M Matsuda2, W Guo3, K Lorenz4, E Alves4, A Koizumi2, V Dierolf5, Y Fujiwara2.
Abstract
The detrimental influence of oxygen on the performance and reliability of V/III nitride based devices is well known. However, the influence of oxygen on the nature of the incorporation of other co-dopants, such as rare earth ions, has been largely overlooked in GaN. Here, we report the first comprehensive study of the critical role that oxygen has on Eu in GaN, as well as atomic scale observation of diffusion and local concentration of both atoms in the crystal lattice. We find that oxygen plays an integral role in the location, stability, and local defect structure around the Eu ions that were doped into the GaN host. Although the availability of oxygen is essential for these properties, it renders the material incompatible with GaN-based devices. However, the utilization of the normally occurring oxygen in GaN is promoted through structural manipulation, reducing its concentration by 2 orders of magnitude, while maintaining both the material quality and the favorable optical properties of the Eu ions. These findings open the way for full integration of RE dopants for optoelectronic functionalities in the existing GaN platform.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26725651 PMCID: PMC4698738 DOI: 10.1038/srep18808
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Rutherford Back Scattering results for GaN:Eu samples grown using EuCppm2 without oxygen co-doping (left) and with oxygen co-doping (right).
The sample with oxygen co-doping shows that almost every Eu ion sits on a Ga sites. Conversely, without oxygen only 70% of the Eu ions sit around Ga sites, the rest exist as interstitials.
Figure 2(a) Schematic of continuous growth (CG) sample structure. (b) The PL spectra under indirect excitation of GaN:Eu samples grown with fixed Eu source conditions, but various O flow rates. (c,d) represent CEES maps of the continuously grown samples with and without O co-doping, respectively.
Figure 3(a) Schematic of delta structure (DS) sample structure. (b) PL emission intensities of the most efficient Eu(DPM)3 sample compared with three DS samples of increasing Eu layer thickness. (c,d) represent CEES maps of the DS samples with GaN to GaN:Eu layer thickness ratios of 10:3 and 10:10, respectively.
Figure 4(a) A reconstructed APT image showing the Eu distribution of the DS samples with alternating 10 nm GaN layers and 4nm GaN:Eu layers. (b) Zoomed in view of the black box from Fig. 3a aligned with a plot of atomic percentage of Eu and O as a function of space. The background signal of Eu is also indicated for reference.