Literature DB >> 32096109

Does the presence of AGG interruptions within the CGG repeat tract have a protective effect on the fertility phenotype of female FMR1 premutation carriers?

M Friedman-Gohas1,2, M Kirshenbaum1,2, A Michaeli1,2, N Domniz1, S Elizur1,2, H Raanani1,2, R Orvieto1,2,3, Y Cohen4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: While FMR1 premutation carriers (CGG 55-200) were shown to have reduced success with IVF treatment (lower oocyte yield), studies reporting on the association between the number of CGG repeats and patients' response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) are inconsistent. In the present study, we aim to explore whether the number of CGG repeats in women with premutation in FMR1 gene, undergoing COH for IVF, correlates with COH variables and whether the number of AGG interruptions may function as a "protective factor" by improving the ovarian response to COH.
METHODS: Retrospective study, in an academic IVF-PGD unit. Fifty-seven consecutive FMR1 premutation carriers who underwent 285 IVF treatment cycles were included. The numbers of CGG repeats and AGG interruptions were retrieved and correlated to the demographics and COH variables.
RESULTS: There were no significant association between the numbers of CGG or the AGG interruptions and the number of oocyte retrieved or the peak estradiol levels. The lack of association was also observed when including all the IVF treatment cycles or only the first or last IVF treatment cycle. Moreover, no associations were found between the number of CGG repeats or AGG interruptions and other COH variables, i.e., duration of stimulation, the total dose of gonadotropin used, or the number of top-quality embryos.
CONCLUSIONS: No associations were observed between the number of CGG repeats or AGG interruptions and any of the COH variables. Further studies are required to identify early biomarkers of POI to empower FMR1 premutation carriers with risk assessment tools to consider procedures such as fertility preservation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AGG; CGG; COH; Fragile X syndrome; IVF; POI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32096109      PMCID: PMC7183013          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01701-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  33 in total

1.  Serum concentrations of follicle stimulating hormone may predict premature ovarian failure in FRAXA premutation women.

Authors:  A Murray; J Webb; F MacSwiney; E L Shipley; N E Morton; G S Conway
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Association of FMR1 repeat size with ovarian dysfunction.

Authors:  A K Sullivan; M Marcus; M P Epstein; E G Allen; A E Anido; J J Paquin; M Yadav-Shah; S L Sherman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  FMR1 repeat sizes in the gray zone and high end of the normal range are associated with premature ovarian failure.

Authors:  Karla L Bretherick; Margo R Fluker; Wendy P Robinson
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Relevance of triple CGG repeats in the FMR1 gene to ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Andrea Weghofer; Kutluk Oktay; David Barad
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  A pilot study of premature ovarian senescence: II. Different genotype and phenotype for genetic and autoimmune etiologies.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Andrea Weghofer; David H Barad
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  The effect of CGG repeat number on ovarian response among fragile X premutation carriers undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Guy Bibi; Mira Malcov; Yaron Yuval; Adi Reches; Dalit Ben-Yosef; Beni Almog; Ami Amit; Foad Azem
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Incidence of premature ovarian failure.

Authors:  C B Coulam; S C Adamson; J F Annegers
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  AGG interruptions and maternal age affect FMR1 CGG repeat allele stability during transmission.

Authors:  Carolyn M Yrigollen; Loreto Martorell; Blythe Durbin-Johnson; Montserrat Naudo; Jordi Genoves; Alessandra Murgia; Roberta Polli; Lili Zhou; Deborah Barbouth; Abigail Rupchock; Brenda Finucane; Gary J Latham; Andrew Hadd; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Flora Tassone
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  CGG repeat length and AGG interruptions as indicators of fragile X-associated diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Jovana Lekovich; Limor Man; Kangpu Xu; Chelsea Canon; Debra Lilienthal; Joshua D Stewart; Nigel Pereira; Zev Rosenwaks; Jeannine Gerhardt
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Fragile X full mutation expansions are inhibited by one or more AGG interruptions in premutation carriers.

Authors:  Sarah L Nolin; Anne Glicksman; Nicole Ersalesi; Carl Dobkin; W Ted Brown; Ru Cao; Eliot Blatt; Sachin Sah; Gary J Latham; Andrew G Hadd
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  1 in total

1.  Connective Tissue Disorders and Fragile X Molecular Status in Females: A Case Series and Review.

Authors:  Merlin G Butler; Waheeda A Hossain; Jacob Steinle; Harry Gao; Eleina Cox; Yuxin Niu; May Quach; Olivia J Veatch
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 6.208

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.