Literature DB >> 26721921

Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

Regina M Baumgärtel1, Hongmei Hu2, Martin Krawczyk-Becker3, Daniel Marquardt4, Tobias Herzke5, Graham Coleman5, Kamil Adiloğlu5, Katrin Bomke6, Karsten Plotz6, Timo Gerkmann3, Simon Doclo4, Birger Kollmeier2, Volker Hohmann7, Mathias Dietz2.   

Abstract

Several binaural audio signal enhancement algorithms were evaluated with respect to their potential to improve speech intelligibility in noise for users of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs). 50% speech reception thresholds (SRT50) were assessed using an adaptive procedure in three distinct, realistic noise scenarios. All scenarios were highly nonstationary, complex, and included a significant amount of reverberation. Other aspects, such as the perfectly frontal target position, were idealized laboratory settings, allowing the algorithms to perform better than in corresponding real-world conditions. Eight bilaterally implanted CI users, wearing devices from three manufacturers, participated in the study. In all noise conditions, a substantial improvement in SRT50 compared to the unprocessed signal was observed for most of the algorithms tested, with the largest improvements generally provided by binaural minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beamforming algorithms. The largest overall improvement in speech intelligibility was achieved by an adaptive binaural MVDR in a spatially separated, single competing talker noise scenario. A no-pre-processing condition and adaptive differential microphones without a binaural link served as the two baseline conditions. SRT50 improvements provided by the binaural MVDR beamformers surpassed the performance of the adaptive differential microphones in most cases. Speech intelligibility improvements predicted by instrumental measures were shown to account for some but not all aspects of the perceptually obtained SRT50 improvements measured in bilaterally implanted CI users.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bilateral; cochlear implant; noise reduction algorithm; speech intelligibility; speech reception threshold

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26721921      PMCID: PMC4771034          DOI: 10.1177/2331216515617917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Hear        ISSN: 2331-2165            Impact factor:   3.293


  42 in total

1.  Spectral subtraction-based speech enhancement for cochlear implant patients in background noise.

Authors:  Li-Ping Yang; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.

Authors:  Ann Spriet; Lieselot Van Deun; Kyriaky Eftaxiadis; Johan Laneau; Marc Moonen; Bas van Dijk; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.017

Review 4.  Bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  George B Wanna; René H Gifford; Theodore R McRackan; Alejandro Rivas; David S Haynes
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Results of a pilot study with a signal enhancement algorithm for HiRes 120 cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Andreas Buechner; Martina Brendel; Hilke Saalfeld; Leonid Litvak; Carolin Frohne-Buechner; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Yi Hu; Ruth Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Robert Peters; Jennifer Lake; Peter Roland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Coupling the Vibrant Soundbridge to cochlea round window: auditory results in patients with mixed hearing loss.

Authors:  Achille M Beltrame; Alessandro Martini; Silvano Prosser; Nadia Giarbini; Christian Streitberger
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Evaluation of a portable two-microphone adaptive beamforming speech processor with cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  R J van Hoesel; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Development of a real time sparse non-negative matrix factorization module for cochlear implants by using xPC target.

Authors:  Hongmei Hu; Agamemnon Krasoulis; Mark Lutman; Stefan Bleeck
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Christoph Völker; Anna Warzybok; Stephan M A Ernst
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  15 in total

1.  Enhancing the perceptual segregation and localization of sound sources with a triple beamformer.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Todd R Jennings; Andrew J Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Benefits of triple acoustic beamforming during speech-on-speech masking and sound localization for bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  David Yun; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech Intelligibility and Spatial Release From Masking Improvements Using Spatial Noise Reduction Algorithms in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Ayham Zedan; Tim Jürgens; Ben Williges; Birger Kollmeier; Konstantin Wiebe; Julio Galindo; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Head Shadow, Summation, and Squelch in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users With Linked Automatic Gain Controls.

Authors:  Taylor A Bakal; Kristina DeRoy Milvae; Chen Chen; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Joshua S Stohl; Robert D Wolford; Reinhold Schatzer; Blake S Wilson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Christoph Völker; Anna Warzybok; Stephan M A Ernst
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies I: Instrumental Evaluation.

Authors:  Regina M Baumgärtel; Martin Krawczyk-Becker; Daniel Marquardt; Christoph Völker; Hongmei Hu; Tobias Herzke; Graham Coleman; Kamil Adiloğlu; Stephan M A Ernst; Timo Gerkmann; Simon Doclo; Birger Kollmeier; Volker Hohmann; Mathias Dietz
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  A Binaural Steering Beamformer System for Enhancing a Moving Speech Source.

Authors:  Kamil Adiloğlu; Hendrik Kayser; Regina M Baumgärtel; Sanja Rennebeck; Mathias Dietz; Volker Hohmann
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 9.  Advancing Binaural Cochlear Implant Technology.

Authors:  Mathias Dietz; David McAlpine
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  A Binaural CI Research Platform for Oticon Medical SP/XP Implants Enabling ITD/ILD and Variable Rate Processing.

Authors:  B Backus; K Adiloğlu; T Herzke
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.