Literature DB >> 26721560

Evaluating and Reporting the Immunogenicity Impacts for Biological Products--a Clinical Pharmacology Perspective.

Yow-Ming C Wang1, Jie Wang2, Yuen Yi Hon2, Lin Zhou2, Lanyan Fang2, Hae Young Ahn2.   

Abstract

Immunogenicity assessment is important for biological products due to potential impacts of immunogenicity on safety and efficacy. We reviewed the prescribing information and the FDA's clinical pharmacology review of 121 approved biological products for evaluating and reporting of immunogenicity data. Of the 121 products, 89% (n = 108) reported the incidence of immunogenicity and 49% (n = 59) reported immunogenicity impact on efficacy. However, only 26% (n = 31) reported whether the immunogenicity affected pharmacokinetics. A subset of 16 products reported effects of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) on both systemic clearance and efficacy; 8 of 16 products had increased systemic clearance coinciding with reduced efficacy, and 6 of 16 products had no changes in either clearance or efficacy. Factors contributing to infrequent reporting of the ADA effect on exposure and methods for determining the effect of ADA on exposure are summarized. Measuring ADA and drug concentrations concurrently over time enables the evaluation of ADA impact on pharmacokinetics. Within-subject comparison of concentration data (before vs. after ADA formation) is a useful alternative to between-subject (ADA+ vs. ADA-) comparison when sample size is limited or when the majority of subjects developed ADA. The biological complexity of immune responses presents challenges to quantifying the ADA impact on pharmacokinetics using model-based methods. Our findings support that pharmacokinetic exposure is more sensitive than efficacy endpoints for evaluating ADA effects. A decrease in drug concentration due to formation of ADA during treatment can serve as an early indicator for potential reduced efficacy occurring at a later time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical pharmacology assessment; immunogenicity data for approved biological products; impact on clinical pharmacokinetics and efficacy; incidence of anti-drug antibodies and neutralizing antibodies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26721560      PMCID: PMC4779104          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-015-9857-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  20 in total

1.  An acid dissociation bridging ELISA for detection of antibodies directed against therapeutic proteins in the presence of antigen.

Authors:  Aaron Patton; Michael C Mullenix; Steven J Swanson; Eugen Koren
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 2.  Critical review: assessment of interferon-β immunogenicity in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Klaus Bendtzen
Journal:  J Interferon Cytokine Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.607

Review 3.  Bioanalytical approaches to quantify "total" and "free" therapeutic antibodies and their targets: technical challenges and PK/PD applications over the course of drug development.

Authors:  Jean W Lee; Marian Kelley; Lindsay E King; Jihong Yang; Hossein Salimi-Moosavi; Meina T Tang; Jian-Feng Lu; John Kamerud; Ago Ahene; Heather Myler; Cindy Rogers
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Regulatory considerations for development of bioanalytical assays for biotechnology products.

Authors:  Patrick G Swann; Marjorie A Shapiro
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Development of antidrug antibodies against adalimumab and association with disease activity and treatment failure during long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Geertje M Bartelds; Charlotte L M Krieckaert; Michael T Nurmohamed; Pauline A van Schouwenburg; Willem F Lems; Jos W R Twisk; Ben A C Dijkmans; Lucien Aarden; Gerrit Jan Wolbink
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Detection of low-affinity anti-drug antibodies and improved drug tolerance in immunogenicity testing by Octet(®) biolayer interferometry.

Authors:  Jian Li; Allen Schantz; Maureen Schwegler; Gopi Shankar
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.935

7.  Development and validation of a homogeneous mobility shift assay for the measurement of infliximab and antibodies-to-infliximab levels in patient serum.

Authors:  Shui-Long Wang; Linda Ohrmund; Scott Hauenstein; Jared Salbato; Rukmini Reddy; Patrick Monk; Steven Lockton; Nicholas Ling; Sharat Singh
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 8.  The effect of antidrug antibodies on the sustainable efficacy of biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis: practical consequences.

Authors:  Mauro Keiserman; Catalin Codreanu; Rohini Handa; Daniel Xibillé-Friedmann; Eduardo Mysler; Francisco Briceño; Servet Akar
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.473

9.  Exenatide once weekly versus twice daily for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority study.

Authors:  Daniel J Drucker; John B Buse; Kristin Taylor; David M Kendall; Michael Trautmann; Dongliang Zhuang; Lisa Porter
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Epoetin-associated pure red cell aplasia: past, present, and future considerations.

Authors:  June M McKoy; Robin E Stonecash; Denis Cournoyer; Jerome Rossert; Allen R Nissenson; Dennis W Raisch; Nicole Casadevall; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.157

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Animal Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Studies (APPS) Reporting Guidelines.

Authors:  Jasbir Singh; Fawzy Elbarbry; Ke Lan; Tomasz Grabowski
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 2.  Reporting, Visualization, and Modeling of Immunogenicity Data to Assess Its Impact on Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies.

Authors:  Chaitali Passey; Satyendra Suryawanshi; Kinjal Sanghavi; Manish Gupta
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Time-dependent population PK models of single-agent atezolizumab in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Mathilde Marchand; Rong Zhang; Phyllis Chan; Valerie Quarmby; Marcus Ballinger; Nitzan Sternheim; Benjamin Wu; Jin Y Jin; René Bruno
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  TCPro: an In Silico Risk Assessment Tool for Biotherapeutic Protein Immunogenicity.

Authors:  Osman N Yogurtcu; Zuben E Sauna; Joseph R McGill; Million A Tegenge; Hong Yang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 5.  Biomarkers for nonclinical infusion reactions in marketed biotherapeutics and considerations for study design.

Authors:  Kirsten M Mease; Amy L Kimzey; Janice A Lansita
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-06

6.  Development and characterization of an anti-rituximab monoclonal antibody panel.

Authors:  Minoru Tada; Takuo Suzuki; Akiko Ishii-Watabe
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 7.  Immunogenicity of immunomodulatory, antibody-based, oncology therapeutics.

Authors:  Jasmine Davda; Paul Declerck; Siwen Hu-Lieskovan; Timothy P Hickling; Ira A Jacobs; Jeffrey Chou; Shahram Salek-Ardakani; Eugenia Kraynov
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 13.751

8.  Introduction of the YTE mutation into the non-immunogenic HIV bnAb PGT121 induces anti-drug antibodies in macaques.

Authors:  Yvonne J Rosenberg; George K Lewis; David C Montefiori; Celia C LaBranche; Mark G Lewis; Lori A Urban; Jonathan P Lees; Lingjun Mao; Xiaoming Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Quantitative analysis of the CD4+ T cell response to therapeutic antibodies in healthy donors using a novel T cell:PBMC assay.

Authors:  Heidi S Schultz; Stine Louise Reedtz-Runge; B Thomas Bäckström; Kasper Lamberth; Christian R Pedersen; Anne M Kvarnhammar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The effect of acylation with fatty acids and other modifications on HLA class II:peptide binding and T cell stimulation for three model peptides.

Authors:  Heidi S Schultz; Søren Østergaard; John Sidney; Kasper Lamberth; Alessandro Sette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.