Mathilde Marchand1, Rong Zhang2, Phyllis Chan2, Valerie Quarmby3, Marcus Ballinger4, Nitzan Sternheim4, Benjamin Wu2, Jin Y Jin2, René Bruno5. 1. Certara Strategic Consulting, Certara, 54 Rue de Londres, 75009, Paris, France. 2. Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. 3. BioAnalytical Sciences, Genentech, Inc, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. 4. Product Development, Genentech, Inc, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. 5. Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech-Roche, 84 Chemin des Grives, 13013, Marseille, France. rene.bruno@roche.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The time-varying clearance (CL) of the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab was assessed on a population of 1519 cancer patients (primarily with non-small-cell lung cancer or metastatic urothelial carcinoma) from three clinical studies. METHODS: The first step was to identify the baseline covariates affecting atezolizumab CL without including time-varying components (stationary covariate model). Two time-varying models were then investigated: (1) a model allowing baseline covariates to vary over time (time-varying covariate model), (2) a model with empirical time-varying Emax CL function. RESULTS: The final stationary covariate model included main effects of body weight, albumin levels, tumor size, anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and gender on atezolizumab CL. Both time-varying models resulted in a clear improvement of the data fit and visual predictive checks over the stationary model. The time-varying covariate model provided the best fit of the data. In this model, the main driver for change in CL over time was variations in albumin level with an increase in serum albumin (improvement in a patient's status) mirroring a decrease in CL. Time-varying ADAs had a small impact (9% increase in CL). None of the covariates impacted atezolizumab CL by more than ± 30% from median. The estimated maximum decrease in CL with time was 22% with the Emax model. CONCLUSION: The overall impact of covariates on atezolizumab CL did not warrant any change in atezolizumab dosing recommendations. The results support the hypothesis that variation in atezolizumab CL over time is associated with patients' disease status, as shown with other checkpoint inhibitors.
PURPOSE: The time-varying clearance (CL) of the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab was assessed on a population of 1519 cancerpatients (primarily with non-small-cell lung cancer or metastatic urothelial carcinoma) from three clinical studies. METHODS: The first step was to identify the baseline covariates affecting atezolizumab CL without including time-varying components (stationary covariate model). Two time-varying models were then investigated: (1) a model allowing baseline covariates to vary over time (time-varying covariate model), (2) a model with empirical time-varying Emax CL function. RESULTS: The final stationary covariate model included main effects of body weight, albumin levels, tumor size, anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and gender on atezolizumab CL. Both time-varying models resulted in a clear improvement of the data fit and visual predictive checks over the stationary model. The time-varying covariate model provided the best fit of the data. In this model, the main driver for change in CL over time was variations in albumin level with an increase in serum albumin (improvement in a patient's status) mirroring a decrease in CL. Time-varying ADAs had a small impact (9% increase in CL). None of the covariates impacted atezolizumab CL by more than ± 30% from median. The estimated maximum decrease in CL with time was 22% with the Emax model. CONCLUSION: The overall impact of covariates on atezolizumab CL did not warrant any change in atezolizumab dosing recommendations. The results support the hypothesis that variation in atezolizumab CL over time is associated with patients' disease status, as shown with other checkpoint inhibitors.
Entities:
Keywords:
Atezolizumab; Cancer patients; Covariate effects; PD-L1; Time-varying clearance
Authors: C Liu; J Yu; H Li; J Liu; Y Xu; P Song; Q Liu; H Zhao; J Xu; V E Maher; B P Booth; G Kim; A Rahman; Y Wang Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: M Stroh; H Winter; M Marchand; L Claret; S Eppler; J Ruppel; O Abidoye; S L Teng; W T Lin; S Dayog; R Bruno; J Jin; S Girish Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017-06-09 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Leora Horn; Scott N Gettinger; Michael S Gordon; Roy S Herbst; Leena Gandhi; Enriqueta Felip; Lecia V Sequist; David R Spigel; Scott J Antonia; Ani Balmanoukian; Philippe A Cassier; Bo Liu; Marcin Kowanetz; Carol O'Hear; Marcella Fassò; William Grossman; Alan Sandler; Jean-Charles Soria Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Hongshan Li; Jingyu Yu; Chao Liu; Jiang Liu; Sriram Subramaniam; Hong Zhao; Gideon M Blumenthal; David C Turner; Claire Li; Malidi Ahamadi; Rik de Greef; Manash Chatterjee; Anna G Kondic; Julie A Stone; Brian P Booth; Patricia Keegan; Atiqur Rahman; Yaning Wang Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Kari M Morrissey; Mathilde Marchand; Hina Patel; Rong Zhang; Benjamin Wu; H Phyllis Chan; Almut Mecke; Sandhya Girish; Jin Y Jin; Helen R Winter; René Bruno Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2019-09-21 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Kenta Yoshida; Phyllis Chan; Mathilde Marchand; Rong Zhang; Benjamin Wu; Marcus Ballinger; Nitzan Sternheim; Jin Y Jin; René Bruno Journal: AAPS J Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Solange Peters; Peter R Galle; Coen A Bernaards; Marcus Ballinger; René Bruno; Valerie Quarmby; Jane Ruppel; Alexandr Vilimovskij; Benjamin Wu; Nitzan Sternheim; Martin Reck Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 4.689