Literature DB >> 31132125

A Simulation-Based Evaluation of Tip-Dating Under the Fossilized Birth-Death Process.

Arong Luo1,2, David A Duchêne2, Chi Zhang3,4, Chao-Dong Zhu1,5,6, Simon Y W Ho2.   

Abstract

Bayesian molecular dating is widely used to study evolutionary timescales. This procedure usually involves phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequence data, with fossil-based calibrations applied as age constraints on internal nodes of the tree. An alternative approach is tip-dating, which explicitly includes fossil data in the analysis. This can be done, for example, through the joint analysis of molecular data from present-day taxa and morphological data from both extant and fossil taxa. In the context of tip-dating, an important development has been the fossilized birth-death process, which allows non-contemporaneous tips and sampled ancestors while providing a model of lineage diversification for the prior on the tree topology and internal node times. However, tip-dating with fossils faces a number of considerable challenges, especially, those associated with fossil sampling and evolutionary models for morphological characters. We conducted a simulation study to evaluate the performance of tip-dating using the fossilized birth-death model. We simulated fossil occurrences and the evolution of nucleotide sequences and morphological characters under a wide range of conditions. Our analyses of these data show that the number and the maximum age of fossil occurrences have a greater influence than the degree of among-lineage rate variation or the number of morphological characters on estimates of node times and the tree topology. Tip-dating with the fossilized birth-death model generally performs well in recovering the relationships among extant taxa but has difficulties in correctly placing fossil taxa in the tree and identifying the number of sampled ancestors. The method yields accurate estimates of the ages of the root and crown group, although the precision of these estimates varies with the probability of fossil occurrence. The exclusion of morphological characters results in a slight overestimation of node times, whereas the exclusion of nucleotide sequences has a negative impact on inference of the tree topology. Our results provide an overview of the performance of tip-dating using the fossilized birth-death model, which will inform further development of the method and its application to key questions in evolutionary biology.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian phylogenetics; evolutionary simulation; fossilized birth–death process; molecular clock; tip-dating; total-evidence dating

Year:  2020        PMID: 31132125      PMCID: PMC7175741          DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syz038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  65 in total

1.  Effects of missing data on topological inference using a Total Evidence approach.

Authors:  Thomas Guillerme; Natalie Cooper
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  A general comparison of relaxed molecular clock models.

Authors:  Thomas Lepage; David Bryant; Hervé Philippe; Nicolas Lartillot
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  On incomplete sampling under birth-death models and connections to the sampling-based coalescent.

Authors:  Tanja Stadler
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  A Rambaut; N C Grassly
Journal:  Comput Appl Biosci       Date:  1997-06

5.  Bayesian Morphological Clock Methods Resurrect Placoderm Monophyly and Reveal Rapid Early Evolution in Jawed Vertebrates.

Authors:  Benedict King; Tuo Qiao; Michael S Y Lee; Min Zhu; John A Long
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Inferring node dates from tip dates in fossil Canidae: the importance of tree priors.

Authors:  Nicholas J Matzke; April Wright
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7.

Authors:  Andrew Rambaut; Alexei J Drummond; Dong Xie; Guy Baele; Marc A Suchard
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 8.  Bayesian molecular clock dating of species divergences in the genomics era.

Authors:  Mario dos Reis; Philip C J Donoghue; Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence.

Authors:  Alexei J Drummond; Simon Y W Ho; Matthew J Phillips; Andrew Rambaut
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Putting scales into evolutionary time: the divergence of major scale insect lineages (Hemiptera) predates the radiation of modern angiosperm hosts.

Authors:  Isabelle M Vea; David A Grimaldi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sphenodontian phylogeny and the impact of model choice in Bayesian morphological clock estimates of divergence times and evolutionary rates.

Authors:  Tiago R Simões; Michael W Caldwell; Stephanie E Pierce
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 7.431

2.  First phylogenetic analysis of Dryophthorinae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) based on structural alignment of ribosomal DNA reveals Cenozoic diversification.

Authors:  Maria Lourdes Chamorro; Bruno A S de Medeiros; Brian D Farrell
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Early cephalopod evolution clarified through Bayesian phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  Alexander Pohle; Björn Kröger; Rachel C M Warnock; Andy H King; David H Evans; Martina Aubrechtová; Marcela Cichowolski; Xiang Fang; Christian Klug
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 7.431

Review 4.  Integrative Phylogenetics: Tools for Palaeontologists to Explore the Tree of Life.

Authors:  Raquel López-Antoñanzas; Jonathan Mitchell; Tiago R Simões; Fabien L Condamine; Robin Aguilée; Pablo Peláez-Campomanes; Sabrina Renaud; Jonathan Rolland; Philip C J Donoghue
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-07

5.  Mind the Outgroup and Bare Branches in Total-Evidence Dating: a Case Study of Pimpliform Darwin Wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae).

Authors:  Tamara Spasojevic; Gavin R Broad; Ilari E Sääksjärvi; Martin Schwarz; Masato Ito; Stanislav Korenko; Seraina Klopfstein
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 15.683

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.