| Literature DB >> 26714863 |
Pedro J Rivero1, Aitor Urrutia2, Javier Goicoechea2, Francisco J Arregui2.
Abstract
Nanoparticles are very interesting because of their surface properties, different from bulk materials. Such properties make possible to endow ordinary products with new functionalities. Their relatively low cost with respect to other nano-additives make them a promising choice for industrial mass-production systems. Nanoparticles of different kind of materials such as silver, titania, and zinc oxide have been used in the functionalization of fibers and fabrics achieving significantly improved products with new macroscopic properties. This article reviews the most relevant approaches for incorporating such nanoparticles into synthetic fibers used traditionally in the textile industry allowing to give a solution to traditional problems for textiles such as the microorganism growth onto fibers, flammability, robustness against ultraviolet radiation, and many others. In addition, the incorporation of such nanoparticles into special ultrathin fibers is also analyzed. In this field, electrospinning is a very promising technique that allows the fabrication of ultrathin fiber mats with an extraordinary control of their structure and properties, being an ideal alternative for applications such as wound healing or even functional membranes.Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial; Coatings; Electrospinning; Flame retardant; Functional nanowebs; Functional textiles; Membranes; Nanoparticles; Superhydrophobic; UV-protection; Wound dressing
Year: 2015 PMID: 26714863 PMCID: PMC4695484 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-015-1195-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1Residues of untreated PET-to-cotton blend and fabrics treated with a phosphorous-based flame retardant and variable globular nanoparticle (octalpropylammomium, POSS) amounts after cone calorimetry tests. Reprinted with permission from [16]
Fig. 2Heat release rate (HRR) curves of neat PET-to-cotton blend and of fabrics treated with a phosphorous-based flame retardant with different POSS amounts. Reprinted with permission from [16]
Summary of the different types of nanoparticles with their corresponding size or the resultant thickness films for flame retardant applications as well as the deposition techniques used for a specific type of fabrics
| Type of fabrics | Deposition process | Type of nanoparticles |
|---|---|---|
| Polyester and cotton/polyester blend | Impregnation process | Globular octalpropylammonium (POSS) nanoparticles, 2015 [ |
| Cotton/polyester blend | Pad-dry-cure method | Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (an average particle size of 30 nm), 2013 [ |
| Polyester | Layer-by-layer assembly | Silica (SiO2) colloidal nanoparticles (<10 nm average thickness), 2011 [ |
| Polyester and cotton/polyester blend | Impregnation process | Mixture of silica (SiO2) globular (spherical particles with an average size of 150 nm) and hydrotalcite (HT) lamellar nanoparticles, 2012 [ |
| Polyamide and polyester | Layer-by-layer assembly | Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles, thickness film (approx. 500 nm), 2015 [ |
| Polyester | Layer-by-layer assembly | Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) (an average diameter of 9.5 nm and an average length of 1.5 μm), 2012 [ |
Fig. 3a Photograph of multicolor silver map obtained as function of variable protective agent and reducing agents. TEM micrograph shows the formation of Ag NPs with different shapes (triangle, rod, cube, bar) for 10 mM PAA and 0.33 mM of DMAB. Reprinted with permission from [45]. Copyright (2013) Springer. b Silver nanosols prepared at pH 8 and silver-nanosol-loaded polyester fabrics (A) NaBH4 reduction, M w 1200, (B) NaBH4 reduction, M w 15,000, (C) UV reduction M w 1200, (D) UV reduction M w 15,000. Reprinted with permission from [46]. Copyright (2008) American Chemical Society
Fig. 4a Effect of untreated polyester samples toward the growth of the investigated stains; b effect of Ag-treated polyester samples toward the growth of the investigated stains. Reprinted with permission from [46]. Copyright (2008) American Chemical Society
Summary of the type of nanoparticles used for antibacterial or antifungal activity
| Antibacterial agent | Fabrics | Antibacterial or antifungal tests |
|---|---|---|
| Silver-tricalcium phosphate NPs (Ag/TCP) | Polyamide |
|
| Silver nanoparticles | Polyester |
|
| Silver nanoparticles | Polyester and polyamide |
|
| Silver nanoparticles | Polyester and polyamide |
|
| Silver nanoparticles | Polyester |
|
| Silver nanoparticles | Polyester |
|
| Silver ammonia complex | Polyamide |
|
| Silver ammonia complex | Polyamide |
|
| Silver ammonia complex | Polyamide |
|
| Silver nanoparticles | Polyamide |
|
| Silver nanoparticles (in situ synthesis) | Polyester |
|
| Copper nanoparticles (in situ synthesis) | Polyamide |
|
| TiO2 nanoparticles | Polyester/wool |
|
| TiO2 nanoparticles | Polyester |
|
| TiO2 nanoparticles | Polyester |
|
| SiO2 nanoparticles | Polyester |
|
| ZnO nanoparticles | Cotton/polyester |
|
| Ag/ZnO composite nanoparticles | Cotton/polyester |
|
| Silver-doped silica-complex nanoparticles | Polyester |
|
| Chitosan and silver-loaded chitosan nanoparticles | Polyester |
|
| Mixture of silver and TiO2 nanoparticles | Polyester |
|
| Silica sols with silver nanoparticles | Polyamide |
|
| Gold nanoparticles | Polypropylene |
|
| Silver nanoparticles | Polypropylene/polyethylene |
|
Fig. 5a Schematic illustration of the synthesis of fluorosilane-coated silica nanoparticles, F-SiO2 NP; b optical photograph of water droplets (>10 μL) on F-SiO2 NP-coated polyester fabric. A small amount of dimethyl methylene blue dye was dissolved in water for illustration purpose. Reprinted with permission from [80]. Copyright (2012) American Chemical Society
Fig. 6SEM images of spin-coated 100-nm F-SiO2 NPs with different concentrations on TESPSA-functionalized Si wafers: a 0.1, b 0.4, c 0.8, and d 1.2 wt.%. The insets in c and d are high-magnification images. Scale bars: 1 μm. Reprinted with permission from [80]. Copyright (2012) American Chemical Society
Fig. 7Digital photographs of various liquid droplets of about 80 μL in volume testing on PP nonwoven fabrics. Reprinted with permission from [85]. Copyright (2015) American Chemical Society
Summary of the type of nanoparticles or nanomaterials used for superhydrophobic surfaces
| Type of fabrics | Deposition process | Superhydrophobic surface |
|---|---|---|
| Polyester | Pad-dry-cure method | Alkaline hydrolysis and fluorocarbon layer, 2011 [ |
| Polyester | Dip-coating | Silver nanoparticles and fluorination, 2012 [ |
| Polyester | Dip-pad-cure process | Silica (SiO2) nanoparticles and fluropolymer, 2015 and 2014 [ |
| Polyester | Spin-coating | Silica (SiO2) nanoparticles and fluorosilanization, 2012 [ |
| Polyester | Electroless deposition | Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles, 2013 [ |
| Polyester | Solution or vapor deposition | Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles and octadecyltrimethoxysilane (ODS), 2013 [ |
| Cotton/polyester | Pulse laser deposition | Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles, 2011 [ |
| Polypropylene | Solvent swelling method | Swollen of the polymeric chains, 2015 [ |
Fig. 8Setup scheme of the simple electrospinning technique to produce electrospun nanofibers (ENFs)
Fig. 9ENFs during the electrospinning process. a It shows the needle (left) and the fibers being electrospun towards the cathode (right). b Detailed view of the Taylor cone formed at the tip of the needle. Reprinted with permission from [88]. Copyright (2012) Wiley Periodicals Inc
Fig. 10SEM images of electrospun nanofibers produced by electrospinning. a Nanofiber mat from random ENFs (inset shows the high-magnified SEM image); b aligned electrospun composite nanofibers. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [96] and from [97], respectively. Copyright (2009) and Copyright (2003), American Chemical Society
Fig. 11TEM image of the Ag-loaded electrospun nanofibers. Ag NPs can be observed onto the ENFs surface. Reprinted with permission from [88]. Copyright (2012) Wiley Periodicals Inc
Fig. 12Bacteriological cultures of Lactobacillus plantarum after 24 h with two different samples. a Reference sample of PAA electrospun nanofiber mat with no silver nanoparticles; b silver-loaded PAA electrospun fiber mat. Substrate: glass slides. Reprinted with permission from [88]. Copyright (2012) Wiley Periodicals Inc
Fig. 13Schematic of the fabrication ECNFs process of triclosan/cyclodextrin-induced complexes (TR/CD-IC) with PLA performed by Kayazi et al. Reprinted with permission from [140]. Copyright (2013) American Chemical Society
Fig. 14Antibacterial results of the ECNFs with and without different types of CD. The bacterial inhibition growth is higher for the PLA/TR/β-CD-IC nanofibers. Reprinted with permission from [140]. Copyright (2013) American Chemical Society
Summary of some of the most relevant works classified by applications, indicating the polymer precursors and the loaded active agents for the electrospun nanofibers fabrication
| Antibacterial applications | ||
| Antibacterial agent | Polymeric precursor | Antibacterial tests |
| Ag NPs (from AgNO3 reduction) | Poly(acrylic acid) (PAA)/cyclodextrin |
|
| Ag NPs (from aqueous solution) | Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) |
|
| Ag NPs (by seed mediate growth method) | Poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) |
|
| Ag NPs (in ethanol solution) | Poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) |
|
| Ag NPs (from AgNO3 reduction) | Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and chitosan |
|
| Ag NPs (from AgNO3 reduction) | Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/regenerated silk fibroin |
|
| Ag NPs (from AgNO3 reduction) | Poly(acrylonitrile) (PAN) | Not tested, 2005, 2003 [ |
| Ag NPs (from AgNO3 reduction) | Nylon 6 |
|
| Quaternary ammonium salts | Diblock copolymers with polyacrylates |
|
| Triclosan | Poly(lactic acid) (PLA), cyclodextrin |
|
| Chlorhexidine | Cellulose acetate |
|
| Other Applications | ||
| Active agent | Polymeric precursor | Application |
| Mupirocin (antibiotic) | Poly- | Drug release, 2008 [ |
| Tetracycline hydrochloride (antibiotic) | Poly(lactic acid) (PLA), poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (PEVA); poly(l-lactid-co-ε-caprolactone) | Drug release, 2002 [ |
| Fluoroquinolone antibiotics | Poly(l-lactide-co-d,l-lactide) and coPLA/poly(ethylene glycol) | Drug release, 2012 [ |
| Ampicillin (antibiotic) | Poly(methyl methacrylate)-nylon 6 | Drug release, 2013 [ |
| Gentamycin sulfate (antibiotic) | Polycaprolactone | Drug release, 2006 [ |
| Iodines | Poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) | Wound dressing, 2007 [ |
| Ag NPs | Gelatin; poly(vinyl alcohol) | Wound dressing mats, 2007, 2008 [ |
| CoS NPs; Ag3PO4 | Poly(acrylonitrile) (PAN) | Water treatment, photocatalyst, 2013, [ |
| CdO, ZnO, TiO2 (photocatalytic) | Poly(vinyl alcohol) | Water treatment, 2012 [ |
| Collagen; Cell adhesive peptides | Poly(L-lactic acid)-co-poly(ε-caprolactone); poly( | Tissue engineering, 2006 [ |
| Hydroxyapatite, PLGA | Poly- | Tendons/ligaments/bones tissue engineering, 2006 [ |
| Boronic acid NPs | Polyamide 6 | Flame retardant, 2012 [ |