Literature DB >> 26713193

Quantifying Gleason scores with photoacoustic spectral analysis: feasibility study with human tissues.

Guan Xu1, Mandy C Davis2, Javed Siddiqui2, Scott A Tomlins2, Shengsong Huang3, Lakshmi P Kunju2, John T Wei4, Xueding Wang5.   

Abstract

Gleason score is a highly prognostic factor for prostate cancer describing the microscopic architecture of the tumor tissue. The standard procedure for evaluating Gleason scores, namely biopsy, is to remove prostate tissue for observation under microscope. Currently, biopsies are guided by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Due to the low sensitivity of TRUS to prostate cancer (PCa), non-guided and saturated biopsies are frequently employed, unavoidably causing pain, damage to the normal prostate tissues and other complications. More importantly, due to the limited number of biopsy cores, current procedure could either miss early stage small tumors or undersample aggressive cancers. Photoacoustic (PA) measurement has the unique capability of evaluating tissue microscopic architecture information at ultrasonic resolution. By frequency domain analysis of the broadband PA signal, namely PA spectral analysis (PASA), the microscopic architecture within the assessed tissue can be quantified. This study investigates the feasibility of evaluating Gleason scores by PASA. Simulations with the classic Gleason patterns and experiment measurements from human PCa tissues have demonstrated strong correlation between the PASA parameters and the Gleason scores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (110.5125) Photoacoustics; (120.3890) Medical optics instrumentation; (170.6510) Spectroscopy, tissue diagnostics; (170.6935) Tissue characterization

Year:  2015        PMID: 26713193      PMCID: PMC4679253          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.6.004781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  47 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation with morphology and tumour stage, histological grade and PSA.

Authors:  A R Padhani; C J Gapinski; D A Macvicar; G J Parker; J Suckling; P B Revell; M O Leach; D P Dearnaley; J E Husband
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Noninvasive laser-induced photoacoustic tomography for structural and functional in vivo imaging of the brain.

Authors:  Xueding Wang; Yongjiang Pang; Geng Ku; Xueyi Xie; George Stoica; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  Histologic grading of prostate cancer: a perspective.

Authors:  D F Gleason
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Prostate cancer distribution in patients diagnosed by transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy.

Authors:  Gregory S Merrick; Sarah Gutman; Hugo Andreini; Walter Taubenslag; David L Lindert; Rodney Curtis; Edward Adamovich; Richard Anderson; Zachariah Allen; Wayne Butler; Kent Wallner
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: a prospective study of pain, anxiety and erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  A Zisman; D Leibovici; J Kleinmann; Y I Siegel; A Lindner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Antonio Berenguer; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Bert G Blijenberg; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Edward P Gelmann; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Richard B Hayes; Barnett S Kramer; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Noninvasive investigation of blood oxygenation dynamics of tumors by near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  H Liu; Y Song; K L Worden; X Jiang; A Constantinescu; R P Mason
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 1.980

9.  Evaluation of T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in localizing prostate cancer before repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Alexandre Ben Cheikh; Nicolas Girouin; Marc Colombel; Jean-Marie Maréchal; Albert Gelet; Alvine Bissery; Muriel Rabilloud; Denis Lyonnet; Olivier Rouvière
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting.

Authors:  A V Taira; G S Merrick; R W Galbreath; H Andreini; W Taubenslag; R Curtis; W M Butler; E Adamovich; K E Wallner
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 5.554

View more
  8 in total

1.  Interstitial photoacoustic spectral analysis: instrumentation and validation.

Authors:  Haonan Zhang; Wan-Yu Chao; Qian Cheng; Shengsong Huang; Xueding Wang; Denglong Wu; Guan Xu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Characterizing cellular morphology by photoacoustic spectrum analysis with an ultra-broadband optical ultrasonic detector.

Authors:  Ting Feng; Qiaochu Li; Cheng Zhang; Guan Xu; L Jay Guo; Jie Yuan; Xueding Wang
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Frequency Domain Analysis of Multiwavelength Photoacoustic Signals for Differentiating Among Malignant, Benign, and Normal Thyroids in an Ex Vivo Study With Human Thyroids.

Authors:  Saugata Sinha; Vikram S Dogra; Bhargava K Chinni; Navalgund A Rao
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Photoacoustic spectral analysis at ultraviolet wavelengths for characterizing the Gleason grades of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Janggun Jo; Javed Siddiqui; Yunhao Zhu; Linyu Ni; Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli; Scott A Tomlins; John T Wei; Evan T Keller; Aaron M Udager; Xueding Wang; Guan Xu
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.776

5.  Diagnosis of prostate cancer by desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometric imaging of small metabolites and lipids.

Authors:  Shibdas Banerjee; Richard N Zare; Robert J Tibshirani; Christian A Kunder; Rosalie Nolley; Richard Fan; James D Brooks; Geoffrey A Sonn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Interstitial assessment of aggressive prostate cancer by physio-chemical photoacoustics: An ex vivo study with intact human prostates.

Authors:  Shengsong Huang; Yu Qin; Yingna Chen; Jing Pan; Chengdang Xu; Denglong Wu; Wan-Yu Chao; John T Wei; Scott A Tomlins; Xueding Wang; J Brian Fowlkes; Paul L Carson; Qian Cheng; Guan Xu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Ambient ionization mass spectrometry imaging for disease diagnosis: Excitements and challenges.

Authors:  Shibdas Banerjee
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Quick identification of prostate cancer by wavelet transform-based photoacoustic power spectrum analysis.

Authors:  Shiying Wu; Ying Liu; Yingna Chen; Chengdang Xu; Panpan Chen; Mengjiao Zhang; Wanli Ye; Denglong Wu; Shengsong Huang; Qian Cheng
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2021-12-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.