Osasuyi U Iyasere1, Edwina A Brown2, Lina Johansson1, Les Huson3, Joanna Smee4, Alexander P Maxwell5, Ken Farrington6, Andrew Davenport7. 1. Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom; 2. Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom; o.iyasere13@imperial.ac.uk. 3. Centre for Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Division of Experimental Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; 4. Cardiovascular and Renal Research Support Unit, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom; 5. Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University, Belfast, United Kingdom; 6. Renal Department, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, United Kingdom; and. 7. University College London Centre for Nephrology, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In-center hemodialysis (HD) is often the default dialysis modality for older patients. Few centers use assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD), which enables treatment at home. This observational study compared quality of life (QoL) and physical function between older patients on assisted PD and HD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Patients on assisted PD who were >60 years old and on dialysis for >3 months were recruited and matched to patients on HD (needing hospital transport) by age, sex, diabetes, dialysis vintage, ethnicity, and index of deprivation. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale. QoL assessments included Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Short Form-12, Palliative Outcomes Symptom Scale (renal), Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale, and Renal Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (RTSQ). Physical function was evaluated by Barthel Score and timed up and go test. RESULTS: In total, 251 patients (129 PD and 122 HD) were recruited. In unadjusted analysis, patients on assisted PD had a higher prevalence of possible depression (HADS>8; PD=38.8%; HD=23.8%; P=0.05) and higher HADS depression score (median: PD=6; HD=5; P=0.05) but higher RTSQ scores (median: PD=55; HD=51; P<0.01). In a generalized linear regression model adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, dialysis vintage, and frailty, assisted PD continued to be associated with higher RTSQ scores (P=0.04) but not with other QoL measures. CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences in measures of QoL and physical function between older patients on assisted PD and comparable patients on HD, except for treatment satisfaction, which is higher in patients on PD. Assisted PD should be considered as an alternative to HD for older patients, allowing them to make their preferred choices.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In-center hemodialysis (HD) is often the default dialysis modality for older patients. Few centers use assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD), which enables treatment at home. This observational study compared quality of life (QoL) and physical function between older patients on assisted PD and HD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Patients on assisted PD who were >60 years old and on dialysis for >3 months were recruited and matched to patients on HD (needing hospital transport) by age, sex, diabetes, dialysis vintage, ethnicity, and index of deprivation. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale. QoL assessments included Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Short Form-12, Palliative Outcomes Symptom Scale (renal), Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale, and Renal Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (RTSQ). Physical function was evaluated by Barthel Score and timed up and go test. RESULTS: In total, 251 patients (129 PD and 122 HD) were recruited. In unadjusted analysis, patients on assisted PD had a higher prevalence of possible depression (HADS>8; PD=38.8%; HD=23.8%; P=0.05) and higher HADS depression score (median: PD=6; HD=5; P=0.05) but higher RTSQ scores (median: PD=55; HD=51; P<0.01). In a generalized linear regression model adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, dialysis vintage, and frailty, assisted PD continued to be associated with higher RTSQ scores (P=0.04) but not with other QoL measures. CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences in measures of QoL and physical function between older patients on assisted PD and comparable patients on HD, except for treatment satisfaction, which is higher in patients on PD. Assisted PD should be considered as an alternative to HD for older patients, allowing them to make their preferred choices.
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Paul Roderick; Chris Jones; Nick Drey; Sara Blakeley; Premila Webster; Jonathan Goddard; Sue Garland; Linda Bourton; Juan Mason; Charlie Tomson Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Marcia Regina Gianotti Franco; Natália Fernandes; Claúdia Azevedo Ribeiro; Abdul Rashid Qureshi; Jose Carolino Divino-Filho; Maria da Glória Lima Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Ismay N van Loon; Namiko A Goto; Franciscus T J Boereboom; Michiel L Bots; Ellen K Hoogeveen; Laila Gamadia; E F H van Bommel; P J G van de Ven; Caroline E Douma; H H Vincent; Yvonne C Schrama; Joy Lips; Machiel A Siezenga; Alferso C Abrahams; Marianne C Verhaar; Marije E Hamaker Journal: Nephron Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 2.847
Authors: Meera N Harhay; Maya K Rao; Kenneth J Woodside; Kirsten L Johansen; Krista L Lentine; Stefan G Tullius; Ronald F Parsons; Tarek Alhamad; Joseph Berger; XingXing S Cheng; Jaqueline Lappin; Raymond Lynch; Sandesh Parajuli; Jane C Tan; Dorry L Segev; Bruce Kaplan; Jon Kobashigawa; Darshana M Dadhania; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 5.992