Literature DB >> 24662166

UK Renal Registry 16th annual report: chapter 2 UK RRT prevalence in 2012: national and centre-specific analyses.

Catriona Shaw1, David Pitcher, Rishi Pruthi, Damian Fogarty.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This chapter describes the characteristics of adult patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the UK in 2012.
METHODS: Data were electronically collected from all 71 renal centres within the UK. A series of crosssectional and longitudinal analyses were performed to describe the demographics of prevalent RRT patients in 2012 at centre and national level.
RESULTS: There were 54,824 adult patients receiving RRT in the UK on 31st December 2012. The UK adult prevalence of RRT was 861 pmp. This represented an annual increase in absolute prevalent numbers of approximately 3.7%, although there was variation between centres and Primary Care and Health Board areas. The actual number of patients increased across all modalities: 2.3% haemodialysis (HD), 0.3% peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 5.6% for those with a functioning transplant. The number of patients receiving home HD has increased by 19.3% since 2011. Median RRT vintage for patients on HD was 3.4 years, PD 1.7 years and for those patients with a transplant, 10.2 years. The median age of prevalent patients was 58 years (HD 66 years, PD 63 years, transplant 52 years) compared to 55 years in 2005. For all ages the prevalence rate in men exceeded that in women. The most common recorded renal diagnosis was glomerulonephritis (biopsy proven/not biopsy proven) (18.8%). Transplantation was the most common treatment modality (50.4%)
CONCLUSIONS: The HD and transplant population continued to expand; the decline in the size of the prevalent PD population has plateaued. There were national, regional and dialysis centre level variations in prevalence rates. Prevalent patients were on average three years older than the prevalent RRT cohort 7 years ago. This has continued implications for service planning and ensuring equity of care for RRT patients.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24662166     DOI: 10.1159/000360021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract        ISSN: 1660-2110


  9 in total

1.  Quality of Life and Physical Function in Older Patients on Dialysis: A Comparison of Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis with Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Osasuyi U Iyasere; Edwina A Brown; Lina Johansson; Les Huson; Joanna Smee; Alexander P Maxwell; Ken Farrington; Andrew Davenport
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Immunosuppressive agents in adult kidney transplantation in the National Health Service: a model-based economic evaluation.

Authors:  Tristan M Snowsill; Jason Moore; Ruben E Mujica Mota; Jaime L Peters; Tracey L Jones-Hughes; Nicola J Huxley; Helen F Coelho; Marcela Haasova; Chris Cooper; Jenny A Lowe; Jo L Varley-Campbell; Louise Crathorne; Matt J Allwood; Rob Anderson
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  PAlliative Care in chronic Kidney diSease: the PACKS study--quality of life, decision making, costs and impact on carers in people managed without dialysis.

Authors:  Helen Rose Noble; Ashley Agus; Kevin Brazil; Aine Burns; Nicola A Goodfellow; Mary Guiney; Fiona McCourt; Cliona McDowell; Charles Normand; Paul Roderick; Colin Thompson; A P Maxwell; M M Yaqoob
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  The financial impact of increasing home-based high dose haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Frank Xiaoqing Liu; Catrin Treharne; Bruce Culleton; Lydia Crowe; Murat Arici
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  Patient Acceptability of the Yorkshire Dialysis Decision Aid (YoDDA) Booklet: A Prospective Non-Randomized Comparison Study Across 6 Predialysis Services.

Authors:  Anna E Winterbottom; Teresa Gavaruzzi; Andrew Mooney; Martin Wilkie; Simon J Davies; Dennis Crane; Ken Tupling; Paul D Baxter; David M Meads; Nigel Mathers; Hilary L Bekker
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Development of next generation sequencing panel for UMOD and association with kidney disease.

Authors:  Caitlin Bailie; Jill Kilner; Alexander P Maxwell; Amy Jayne McKnight
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Taking hospital treatments home: a mixed methods case study looking at the barriers and success factors for home dialysis treatment and the influence of a target on uptake rates.

Authors:  Gill Combes; Kerry Allen; Kim Sein; Alan Girling; Richard Lilford
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Peritoneal dialysis and in-centre haemodialysis: a cost-utility analysis from a UK payer perspective.

Authors:  Catrin Treharne; Frank Xiaoqing Liu; Murat Arici; Lydia Crowe; Usman Farooqui
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.561

9.  Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with conservatively managed stage 5 chronic kidney disease: limitations of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36: SF-36.

Authors:  Gilli Erez; Lucy Selman; Fliss E M Murtagh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.147

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.