Literature DB >> 26712604

Why Psychology Cannot be an Empirical Science.

Jan Smedslund1.   

Abstract

The current empirical paradigm for psychological research is criticized because it ignores the irreversibility of psychological processes, the infinite number of influential factors, the pseudo-empirical nature of many hypotheses, and the methodological implications of social interactivity. An additional point is that the differences and correlations usually found are much too small to be useful in psychological practice and in daily life. Together, these criticisms imply that an objective, accumulative, empirical and theoretical science of psychology is an impossible project.

Keywords:  Empirical science; Generalized human mind; Infinite number of factors; Irreversibility; Practical relevance; Social interactivity; The pseudo-empirical

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26712604     DOI: 10.1007/s12124-015-9339-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci        ISSN: 1932-4502


  6 in total

1.  One hundred years of laws in psychology.

Authors:  Karl Halvor Teigen
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2002

2.  A pragmatic basis for judging models and theories in health psychology: the axiomatic method.

Authors:  G Smedslund
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2000-03

Review 3.  Activity Theories and the Ontology of Psychology: Learning from Danish and Russian Experiences.

Authors:  Jens Mammen; Irina Mironenko
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2015-12

4.  Research-based knowledge in psychology: what, if anything, is its incremental value to the practitioner?

Authors:  Jan Smedslund; Lee Ross
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2014-12

5.  How Mean is the Mean?

Authors:  Craig P Speelman; Marek McGann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-23

6.  Predicting survey responses: how and why semantics shape survey statistics on organizational behaviour.

Authors:  Jan Ketil Arnulf; Kai Rune Larsen; Øyvind Lund Martinsen; Chih How Bong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total
  13 in total

1.  Psychology is not primarily Empirical Science: A Comparison of Cultures in the Lexical Hypothesis Tradition as a Failure of Introspection.

Authors:  Václav Linkov
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2017-06

Review 2.  Agency, Chance, and the Scientific Status of Psychology.

Authors:  Martin E Morf
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2018-12

Review 3.  Beyond Objectivity and Subjectivity: The Intersubjective Foundations of Psychological Science.

Authors:  Michael F Mascolo
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2016-12

4.  Activity Theory: Quest for the Unattainable and Hope for the Future (Reply to Commentaries).

Authors:  Irina A Mironenko
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2016-09

Review 5.  Debates about the Scientific Status of Psychology: Looking at the Bright Side.

Authors:  Lucas B Mazur; Meike Watzlawik
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2016-12

Review 6.  Building Blocks of Psychology: on Remaking the Unkept Promises of Early Schools.

Authors:  Davood G Gozli; Wei Sophia Deng
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2018-03

7.  Where is the Trouble in Pseudo-empirical Research?

Authors:  Patrick Byers
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2021-08-18

8.  Human Capital Creation: A Collective Psychological, Social, Organizational and Religious Perspective.

Authors:  Ansar Abbas; Dian Ekowati; Fendy Suhariadi; Aisha Anwar
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2022-09-16

9.  The Tangled Knots of Neuroscientific Experimentation.

Authors:  Stefan Frisch
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2021-07-22

10.  A Plea for Scientific Ambitions: Reply to Commentaries from Martin Wieser, Nikolai Veresov, Asger Neumann, and Peter Krøjgaard.

Authors:  Jens Mammen
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2016-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.