Literature DB >> 26712374

The utility of metabolic activation mixtures containing human hepatic post-mitochondrial supernatant (S9) for in vitro genetic toxicity assessment.

Julie A Cox1, Mick D Fellows2, Tsuneo Hashizume3, Paul A White1.   

Abstract

In vitro genotoxicity assessment routinely employs an exogenous metabolic activation mixture to simulate mammalian metabolism. Activation mixtures commonly contain post-mitochondrial liver supernatant (i.e. S9) from chemically induced Sprague Dawley rats. Although Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) test guidelines permit the use of other S9 preparations, assessments rarely employ human-derived S9. The objective of this study is to review and evaluate the use of human-derived S9 for in vitro genetic toxicity assessment. All available published genotoxicity assessments employing human S9 were compiled for analysis. To facilitate comparative analyses, additional matched Ames data using induced rat liver S9 were obtained for certain highly cited chemicals. Historical human and induced rat S9 quality control reports from Moltox were obtained and mined for enzyme activity and mutagenic potency data. Additional in vitro micronucleus data were experimentally generated using human and induced rat S9. The metabolic activity of induced rat S9 was found to be higher than human S9, and linked to high mutagenic potency results. This study revealed that human S9 often yields significantly lower Salmonella mutagenic potency values, especially for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, aflatoxin B1 and heterocyclic amines (~3- to 350-fold). Conversely, assessment with human S9 activation yields higher potency for aromatic amines (~2- to 50-fold). Outliers with extremely high mutagenic potency results were observed in the human S9 data. Similar trends were observed in experimentally generated mammalian micronucleus cell assays, however human S9 elicited potent cytotoxicity L5178Y, CHO and TK6 cell lines. Due to the potential for reduced sensitivity and the absence of a link between enzyme activity levels and mutagenic potency, human liver S9 is not recommended for use alone in in vitro genotoxicity screening assays; however, human S9 may be extremely useful in follow-up tests, especially in the case of chemicals with species-specific metabolic differences, such as aromatic amines. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2015. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26712374     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gev082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  12 in total

1.  In vitro airway models from mice, rhesus macaques, and humans maintain species differences in xenobiotic metabolism and cellular responses to naphthalene.

Authors:  Jacklyn Kelty; Nataliia Kovalchuk; Eric Uwimana; Lei Yin; Xinxin Ding; Laura Van Winkle
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 6.011

2.  The Alginate Immobilization of Metabolic Enzymes Platform Retrofits an Estrogen Receptor Transactivation Assay With Metabolic Competence.

Authors:  Chad Deisenroth; Danica E DeGroot; Todd Zurlinden; Andrew Eicher; James McCord; Mi-Young Lee; Paul Carmichael; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Comparison of methods used for evaluation of mutagenicity/genotoxicity of model chemicals - parabens.

Authors:  J Chrz; B Hošíková; L Svobodová; D Očadlíková; H Kolářová; M Dvořáková; K Kejlová; L Malina; G Jírová; A Vlková; M Mannerström
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 1.881

4.  NOX2 inhibitor GSK2795039 metabolite identification towards drug optimization.

Authors:  Elias Carvalho Padilha; Pranav Shah; Ganesha Rai; Xin Xu
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.571

5.  Development of reconstructed intestinal micronucleus cytome (RICyt) assay in 3D human gut model for genotoxicity assessment of orally ingested substances.

Authors:  Hui Kheng Lim; Christopher Owen Hughes; Michelle Jing Sin Lim; Jia'En Jasmine Li; Moumita Rakshit; Calvin Yeo; Kern Rei Chng; Angela Li; Joanne Sheot Harn Chan; Kee Woei Ng; David Ian Leavesley; Benjamin Paul Chapman Smith
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.168

6.  Pharmacological Assessment of the Antiprotozoal Activity, Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Medicinal Plants Used in the Treatment of Malaria in the Greater Mpigi Region in Uganda.

Authors:  Fabien Schultz; Ogechi Favour Osuji; Anh Nguyen; Godwin Anywar; John R Scheel; Guy Caljon; Luc Pieters; Leif-Alexander Garbe
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  Application of the TGx-28.65 transcriptomic biomarker to classify genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells in the presence of rat liver S9.

Authors:  Carole L Yauk; Julie K Buick; Andrew Williams; Carol D Swartz; Leslie Recio; Heng-Hong Li; Albert J Fornace; Errol M Thomson; Jiri Aubrecht
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Mutation Analysis in Cultured Cells of Transgenic Rodents.

Authors:  Ahmad Besaratinia; Albert Zheng; Steven E Bates; Stella Tommasi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Flow cytometric micronucleus assay and TGx-DDI transcriptomic biomarker analysis of ten genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals in human HepaRG™ cells.

Authors:  Julie K Buick; Andrew Williams; Rémi Gagné; Carol D Swartz; Leslie Recio; Stephen S Ferguson; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2020-02-04

Review 10.  Application of In Vitro Metabolism Activation in High-Throughput Screening.

Authors:  Masato Ooka; Caitlin Lynch; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.