| Literature DB >> 34276369 |
Fabien Schultz1,2, Ogechi Favour Osuji2, Anh Nguyen2, Godwin Anywar3, John R Scheel4,5, Guy Caljon6, Luc Pieters7, Leif-Alexander Garbe2,8.
Abstract
We investigated the potential antimalarial and toxicological effects of 16 medicinal plants frequently used by traditional healers to treat malaria, fever, and related disorders in the Greater Mpigi region in Uganda. Species studied were Albizia coriaria, Cassine buchananii, Combretum molle, Erythrina abyssinica, Ficus saussureana, Harungana madagascariensis, Leucas calostachys, Microgramma lycopodioides, Morella kandtiana, Plectranthus hadiensis, Securidaca longipedunculata, Sesamum calycinum subsp. angustifolium, Solanum aculeastrum, Toddalia asiatica, Warburgia ugandensis, and Zanthoxylum chalybeum. In addition, the traditional healers indicated that P. hadiensis is used as a ritual plant to boost fertility and prepare young women and teenagers for motherhood in some Ugandan communities where a high incidence of rapidly growing large breast masses in young female patients was observed (not necessarily breast cancer). We present results from various in vitro experiments performed with 56 different plant extracts, namely, 1) an initial assessment of the 16 species regarding their traditional use in the treatment of malaria by identifying promising plant extract candidates using a heme biocrystallization inhibition library screen; 2) follow-up investigations of antiprotozoal effects of the most bioactive crude extracts against chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum K1; 3) a cytotoxicity counterscreen against human MRC-5SV2 lung fibroblasts; 4) a genotoxicity evaluation of the extract library without and with metabolic bioactivation with human S9 liver fraction; and 5) an assessment of the mutagenicity of the ritual plant P. hadiensis. A total of seven extracts from five plant species were selected for antiplasmodial follow-up investigations based on their hemozoin formation inhibition activity in the heme biocrystallization assay. Among other extracts, an ethyl acetate extract of L. calostachys leaves exhibited antiplasmodial activity against P. falciparum K1 (IC50 value: 5.7 µg/ml), which was further characterized with a selectivity index of 2.6 (CC50 value: 14.7 µg/ml). The experiments for assessment of potential procarcinogenic properties of plant extracts via evaluation of in vitro mutagenicity and genotoxicity indicated that few extracts cause mutations. The species T. asiatica showed the most significant genotoxic effects on both bacterial test strains (without metabolic bioactivation at a concentration of 500 µg/plate). However, none of the mutagenic extracts from the experiments without metabolic bioactivation retained their genotoxic activity after metabolic bioactivation of the plant extract library through pre-incubation with human S9 liver fraction. While this study did not show that P. hadiensis has genotoxic properties, it did provide early stage support for the therapeutic use of the medicinal plants from the Greater Mpigi region.Entities:
Keywords: Mpigi; Uganda; antiprotozoal; cytotoxicity; ethnopharmacology; genotoxicity; malaria; medicinal plants
Year: 2021 PMID: 34276369 PMCID: PMC8278201 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.678535
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
FIGURE 1Stacked histogram for ethnopharmacological information from the Greater Mpigi region in Uganda, describing the medicinal use of 16 plant candidates (with emphasis on treatment of malaria and fever). The figure shows the relative frequencies of citation (RFCs) in %, a field assessment index, which was calculated from data obtained through an ethnobotanical survey of 39 traditional healers (Schultz et al., 2020b). Individual RFCs indicate the importance of each plant species used for treatment relative to the total number of informants interviewed in the study (n = 39). RFCs vary from 0% (none of the survey participants uses this plant species to treat a specific medical condition) to 100% (all survey participants use this plant species to treat a specific medical condition). Consequently, the higher the cumulative RFC values (x-axis), the more common the traditional use of a plant species in treatment of medical conditions caused by malaria infection.
FIGURE 2Simplified illustration of the locations of metabolic elimination of xenobiotics inside the human body.
Information on collected plant species and different extracts investigated in the study.
| Scientific name | Extraction solvent | Extract ID | Family | Local name in Luganda | Plant part | Voucher specimen # and location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Ethyl acetate | eE001 | Polygalaceae | Mukondwe | Stem | AG196 (Makerere University Herbarium, Uganda) |
| Water | wE001 | |||||
|
| hE001 | |||||
| Methanol | mE001 | |||||
| Methanol (sox. succ.) | smE001 | |||||
|
| Ethyl acetate | eE002 | Polypodiaceae | Kukumba | Root (rhizomes) | AG639 (Makerere University Herbarium, Uganda) |
| Water | wE002 | |||||
| Methanol | smE002 | |||||
|
| Ethyl acetate | eE003 | Moraceae | Muwo | Stem | AG219 (Makerere University Herbarium, Uganda) |
| Water | wE003 | |||||
|
| hE003 | |||||
| Methanol | mE003 | |||||
| Methanol (sox. succ.) | smE003 | |||||
|
| Ethyl acetate | eE004 | Pedaliaceae | Lutungotungo | Leaves | AG205 (Makerere University Herbarium, Uganda) 23173 |
| Water | wE004 | |||||
|
| hE004 | |||||
| Methanol | mE004 | |||||
| Methanol (sox. succ.) | smE004 | |||||
|
| Ethyl acetate | eE005 | Lamiaceae | Kakuba musulo | Leaves | AG195 (Makerere University Herbarium, Uganda) 23175 |
| Water | wE005 | |||||
|
| hE005 | |||||
| Methanol (sox. succ.) | smE005 | |||||
|
| Ethyl acetate | eE006 | Solanaceae | Kitengo | Root | AG193 (Makerere University Herbarium, Uganda) |
| Water | wE006 | |||||
|
| hE006 | |||||
| Methanol (sox. succ.) | smE006 | |||||
|
| Ethyl acetate | eE007 | Fabaceae | Mugavu | Stem bark | AG203 (Makerere University Herbarium, Uganda) |
| Ethanol | etE007 | |||||
|
| Ethyl acetate | eE008 | Fabaceae | Jjirikiti | Stem bark | AG199 (Makerere University Herbarium, Uganda) |
| Ethanol | etE008 | |||||
|
| Ethyl acetate | eE009 | Rutaceae | Ntaleyaddungu | Stem bark | AG204 (Makerere University Herbarium, Uganda) |
| Ethanol | etE009 | |||||
| Ethanol | etE017 | |||||
| Diethyl ether | dietE017 | |||||
| Ethanol | etE017a | |||||
| Diethyl ether | dietE017a | |||||
|
| Ethyl acetatec | eE010 | Rutaceae | Kawule | Leaves (80%)Bark (20%) | AG190 (Makerere University Herbarium, Uganda) |
| Ethanol | etE010 | |||||
| Diethyl ether | dietE010 | |||||
| Ethanol | etE010a | |||||
|
| Ethyl acetate | eE011 | Hypericaceae | Mukabiiransiko | Stem bark | AG230 (Makerere University Herbarium, Uganda) 23180 |
| Ethanol | etE011 | |||||
| Diethyl ether | dietE011 | |||||
| Ethanol | etE011a | |||||
|
| Ethanol | etE012 | Myricaeae | Mukikimbo | Root | AG201 (Makerere University Herbarium, Uganda) 23174 |
| Ethanol | etE012a | |||||
| Diethyl ether | dietE012 | |||||
|
| Ethyl acetate | eE013 | Celastraceae | Mbaluka | Stem bark | AG198 (Makerere University Herbarium, Uganda) |
| Ethanol | etE013 | |||||
| Ethanol | etE013a | |||||
|
| Ethanol | etE014a | Canellaceae | Abasi | Stem bark | AG220 (Makerere University Herbarium, Uganda) 23181 |
| Diethyl ether | dietE014 | |||||
|
| Ethyl acetate | eE015 | Combretaceae | Ndagi | Stem bark | AG191 (Makerere University Herbarium, Uganda) |
| Ethanol | etE015 | |||||
|
| Diethyl ether | dietE016 | Lamiaceae | Kibwankulata | Leaves | AG210 (Makerere University Herbarium, Uganda) |
|
| hE016 |
Specimens have been digitized and are available for viewing at http://sernecportal.org/portal/;
Collected in Apr. 2016
Collected in Oct. 2015
Collected in Sep. 2013
Collected in Sep. 2016
sox., Soxhlet extraction; sox. succ., successive Soxhlet extraction.
Results of the heme biocrystallization library screen; +: observed inhibition activity; -: negative; nt indicates that a sample was not tested.
| Scientific name | Extract ID | Inhibition of | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,000 µg/ml | 100 µg/ml | 10 µg/ml | 1 µg/ml | |||||||||||||
| 20–50 %I | >50 %I | 1–20 %I | 20–50 %I | >50 %I | 1–20 %I | 20–50 %I | >50 %I | 1–20 %I | 20–50 %I | >50 %I | ||||||
|
| eE001 | − | − | |||||||||||||
| wE001 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| hE001 | nt | |||||||||||||||
| mE001 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| smE001 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
|
| eE002 | nt | ||||||||||||||
| wE002 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| smE002 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
|
| eE003 | − | − | |||||||||||||
| wE003 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| hE003 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| mE003 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| smE003 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
|
| eE004 | + | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | ||||
| wE004 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| hE004 | + | − | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | + | − | |||||
| mE004 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| smE004 | + | − | − | − | − | |||||||||||
|
| eE005 | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | − | + | − | − | ||||
| wE005 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| hE005 | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | ||||||||
| smE005 | − | + | − | − | − | |||||||||||
|
| eE006 | − | − | |||||||||||||
| wE006 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| hE006 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| smE006 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
|
| eE007 | − | − | |||||||||||||
| etE007 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
|
| eE008 | − | + | − | − | − | ||||||||||
| etE008 | + | − | − | − | − | |||||||||||
|
| eE009 | + | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | ||||
| etE009 | + | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | |||||
| etE017 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| dietE017 | nt | |||||||||||||||
| etE017a | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| dietE017a | − | − | ||||||||||||||
|
| eE010 | nt | ||||||||||||||
| etE010 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| dietE010 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| etE010a | − | − | ||||||||||||||
|
| eE011 | − | − | |||||||||||||
| etE011 | + | − | − | − | − | |||||||||||
| dietE011 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| etE011a | − | − | ||||||||||||||
|
| etE012 | − | − | |||||||||||||
| etE012a | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| dietE012 | nt | |||||||||||||||
|
| eE013 | nt | ||||||||||||||
| etE013 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
| etE013a | − | − | ||||||||||||||
|
| etE014a | − | − | |||||||||||||
| dietE014 | + | − | − | − | + | − | + | − | − | − | − | |||||
|
| eE015 | − | − | |||||||||||||
| etE015 | − | − | ||||||||||||||
|
| dietE016 | + | − | − | − | − | ||||||||||
| hE016 | − | + | + | − | − | − | + | − | + | − | − | |||||
| Chloroquine diphosphate | Positive control | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | + | ||||
| DMSO | Solvent control | − | − | |||||||||||||
Results of the in vitro dose-response studies, investigating the antiplasmodial activity and cytotoxic effects of selected medicinal plant samples from the Greater Mpigi region against chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum K1 and human MRC-5SV2 lung fibroblasts.
| Extract ID | Plant species | Type of extract |
| MRC-5SV2 cells | SI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC50 ± SEM | CC50 ± SEM | ||||
| dietE014 |
| Diethyl ether | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.6 |
| eE005 |
| Ethyl acetate | 5.7 ± 1.2 | 14.7 ± 2.9 | 2.6 |
| eE009 |
| Ethyl acetate | 11.9 ± 3.7 | 24.1 ± 1.3 | 2.0 |
| etE009 |
| Ethanol | 12.4 ± 2.4 | 26.9 ± 1.0 | 2.2 |
| hE004 |
|
| 19.6 ± 5.0 | 26.6 ± 3.7 | 1.4 |
| eE004 |
| Ethyl acetate | 21.9 ± 6.8 | 27.0 ± 3.8 | 1.2 |
| hE016 |
|
| 23.1 ± 3.9 | 7.3 ± 1.1 | 0.3 |
| Chloroquine | Positive control | - (Pure compound) | 0.04 ± 0.0 | >20 | >500 |
| Tamoxifen | Positive control | - (Pure compound) | Nt | 3.85 ± 0.14 | - |
| DMSO | Solvent control | - (Pure compound) | >64 | >64 | - |
The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) and the half maximal cytotoxic concentration (CC50) are stated in µg/ml. SEM, standard error of the mean; SI, selectivity index.
Results of the Salmonella reverse mutation assay showing the mutagenicity indices (MIs) and the MI interpretations at 500 µg/plate; +: positive, mutagenic; +/−: weakly mutagenic; −: negative: non-mutagenic; nt: not tested; GI: growth inhibition.
| Scientific name | Extract ID | TA98 | TA100 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without metabolic activation | With metabolic activation | Without metabolic activation | With metabolic activation | ||||||
| Mutagenicity | MI | Mutagenicity | MI | Mutagenicity | MI | Mutagenicity | MI | ||
|
| eE001 |
| 0.8 |
| 0.9 |
| 1.4 |
| 0.9 |
| wE001 |
| 1.5 |
| 0.7 |
| 1.6 |
| 1.2 | |
| hE001 | nt |
| 0.4 | nt |
| 0.8 | |||
| mE001 |
| 0.7 |
| 1.1 |
| 1.2 |
| 0.4 | |
| smE001 |
| 0.9 |
| 1.0 |
| 1.5 |
| 0.0 | |
|
| eE002 |
| 1.2 |
| 0.9 |
| 1.4 |
| 1.0 |
| wE002 |
| 1.2 |
| 1.1 |
| 1.1 |
| 0.7 | |
| smE002 |
| 1.4 |
| 0.8 |
| 1.7 | 1.0 | ||
|
| eE003 |
| 0.9 |
| 0.9 |
| 1.0 |
| 0.7 |
| wE003 |
| 1.0 |
| 0.8 |
| 1.6 |
| 1.0 | |
| hE003 |
| 1.1 |
| 0.7 |
| 1.5 |
| 0.9 | |
| mE003 |
| 0.8 |
| 0.8 |
| 1.4 |
| 1.0 | |
| smE003 |
| 1.0 |
| 0.7 |
| 1.6 |
| 0.9 | |
|
| eE004 |
| 0.8 |
| 0.8 |
| 1.3 |
| 1.0 |
| wE004 |
| 1.0 |
| 1.0 |
| 1.7 |
| 1.1 | |
| hE004 |
| 6.5 |
| 0.6 |
| 1.5 |
| 1.0 | |
| mE004 |
| 1.0 |
| 1.1 |
| 1.4 |
| 1.0 | |
| smE004 |
| 0.7 |
| 1.0 |
| 1.5 |
| 1.1 | |
|
| eE005 |
| 0.9 |
| 0.6 |
| 1.4 |
| 0.7 |
| wE005 |
| 1.0 |
| 0.9 |
| 1.7 |
| 1.1 | |
| hE005 |
| 1.2 |
| 0.8 |
| 1.5 |
| 1.0 | |
| smE005 |
| 1.0 |
| 0.8 |
| 1.6 |
| 1.0 | |
|
| eE006 |
| 0.8 |
| 0.8 |
| 1.9 |
| 1.0 |
| wE006 | nt |
| 1.1 | nt |
| 1.0 | |||
| hE006 |
| 10.7 |
| 0.6 |
| 1.6 |
| 0.9 | |
| smE006 |
| 0.8 |
| 0.7 |
| 1.7 |
| 1.0 | |
|
| eE007 |
| 0.7 |
| 0.9 |
| 1.3 |
| 1.0 |
| etE007 |
| 1.1 |
| 1.0 |
| 1.6 |
| 1.0 | |
|
| eE008 |
| 0.8 |
| 0.4 |
| 1.0 |
| 0.8 |
| etE008 |
| 1.0 |
| 0.4 |
| 1.0 |
| 0.7 | |
|
| eE009 |
| 1.1 |
| 1.0 |
| 1.8 |
| 1.0 |
| etE009 |
| 0.8 |
| 1.0 |
| 1.5 |
| 1.0 | |
| etE017 | nt | nt | nt | nt | |||||
| dietE017 |
| 0.7 | nt |
| 1.8 | nt | |||
| etE017a |
| 0.9 |
| 0.9 |
| 1.4 |
| 1.4 | |
| dietE017a |
| 0.7 |
| 0.7 |
| 1.2 |
| 0.9 | |
|
| eE010 |
| 3.8 |
| 0.9 |
| 3.9 |
| 1.0 |
| etE010 |
| 1.8 |
| 0.4 |
| 3.1 |
| 0.7 | |
| dietE010 |
| 4.0 |
| 0.6 |
| 3.7 |
| 1.2 | |
| etE010a |
| 1.7 |
| 1.0 |
| 3.2 |
| 0.9 | |
|
| eE011 |
| 1.0 |
| 0.9 |
| 1.4 |
| 1.0 |
| etE011 |
| 0.9 |
| 0.6 |
| 1.4 |
| 1.2 | |
| dietE011 |
| 0.7 |
| 0.4 |
| 1.1 |
| 0.6 | |
| etE011a |
| 1.3 |
| 0.8 |
| 1.4 |
| 0.7 | |
|
| etE012 |
| 0.8 |
| 1.1 |
| 1.5 |
| 1.0 |
| etE012a |
| 1.0 |
| 1.1 |
| 1.4 |
| 0.9 | |
| dietE012 |
| 1.0 |
| 0.8 |
| 0.7 |
| 0.9 | |
|
| eE013 |
| 0.9 |
| 0.8 |
| 1.6 |
| 1.1 |
| etE013 |
| 0.9 |
| 1.1 |
| 1.5 |
| 1.7 | |
| etE013a |
| 0.9 |
| 0.9 |
| 1.3 |
| 0.9 | |
|
| etE014a |
| 0.8 |
| 0.9 |
| 0.7 |
| 1.3 |
| dietE014 | nt | nt | nt | nt | |||||
|
| eE015 |
| 0.9 |
| 1.1 |
| 1.1 |
| 1.2 |
| etE015 |
| 1.0 |
| 1.2 |
| 1.5 |
| 1.0 | |
|
| dietE016 |
| 1.0 |
| 1.1 | nt |
| 1.2 | |
| hE016 |
| 0.9 |
| 0.5 |
| 1.4 |
| 0.8 | |
| Spontaneous mutations | Negative control |
| 1.0 |
| 1.0 |
| 1.0 |
| 1.0 |
| 2-Nitrofluoren | Positive control |
| 18.9 | nt | nt | nt | |||
| Methyl methanesulfonate | Positive control | nt | nt | 6.6 | nt | ||||
| 2-Aminoflourene | Positive control |
| 1.0 |
| 12.4 |
| 2.2 |
| 6.1 |
FIGURE 3Flow scheme describing the heme biocrystallization assay procedure.