Literature DB >> 26712337

The ability of quaternary ammonium groups attached to a urethane bandage to inhibit bacterial attachment and biofilm formation in a mouse wound model.

Phat L Tran1, Eric Huynh1, Abdul N Hamood2, Anselm de Souza3, Gregory Schultz4, Bernd Liesenfeld5, Dilip Mehta3, Daniel Webster6, Ted W Reid1,2.   

Abstract

For proper wound healing, control of bacteria or bacterial infections is of major importance. While caring for a wound, dressing material plays a key role as bacteria can live in the bandage and keep re-infecting the wound. They do this by forming biofilms in the bandage, which slough off planktonic bacteria and overwhelm the host defense. It is thus necessary to develop a wound dressing that will inhibit bacterial growth. This study examines the effectiveness of a polyurethane foam wound dressing bound with polydiallyl-dimethylammonium chloride (pDADMAC) to inhibit the growth of bacteria in a wound on the back of a mouse. This technology does not allow pDADMAC to leach away from the dressing into the wound, thereby preventing cytotoxic effects. Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii were chosen for the study to infect the wounds. S. aureus and P. aeruginosa are important pathogens in wound infections, while A. baumannii was selected because of its ability to acquire or upregulate antibiotic drug resistance determinants. In addition, two different isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) were tested. All the bacteria were measured in the wound dressing and in the wound tissue under the dressing. Using colony-forming unit (CFU) assays, over six logs of inhibition (100%) were found for all the bacterial strains using pDADMAC-treated wound dressing when compared with control-untreated dressing. The CFU assay results obtained with the tissues were significant as there were 4-5 logs of reduction (100%) of the test organism in the tissue of the pDADMAC-covered wound versus that of the control dressing-covered wound. As the pDADMAC cannot leave the dressing (like other antimicrobials), this would imply that the dressing acts as a reservoir for free bacteria from a biofilm and plays a significant role in the development of a wound infection.
© 2015 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bandage; Biofilm inhibition; Quaternary ammonium polyurethane; pDADMAC-PU

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26712337      PMCID: PMC7949653          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  14 in total

1.  Mortality after Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in two hospitals in Oxfordshire, 1997-2003: cohort study.

Authors:  David H Wyllie; Derrick W Crook; Tim E A Peto
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-23

2.  Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections.

Authors:  Benjamin A Lipsky; Anthony R Berendt; H Gunner Deery; John M Embil; Warren S Joseph; Adolf W Karchmer; Jack L LeFrock; Daniel P Lew; Jon T Mader; Carl Norden; James S Tan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  A study on the ability of quaternary ammonium groups attached to a polyurethane foam wound dressing to inhibit bacterial attachment and biofilm formation.

Authors:  Phat L Tran; Abdul N Hamood; Anselm de Souza; Gregory Schultz; Bernd Liesenfeld; Dilip Mehta; Ted W Reid
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 4.  Burn wound infections.

Authors:  Deirdre Church; Sameer Elsayed; Owen Reid; Brent Winston; Robert Lindsay
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: the association between age and mortality and functional status.

Authors:  Preeti N Malani; Meenakshi M Rana; Mousumi Banerjee; Suzanne F Bradley
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 6.  Acinetobacter baumannii: epidemiology, antimicrobial resistance, and treatment options.

Authors:  Lisa L Maragakis; Trish M Perl
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Contribution of acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia to overall mortality in a general intensive care unit.

Authors:  D S Thompson; R Workman; M Strutt
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Organoselenium coating on cellulose inhibits the formation of biofilms by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Phat L Tran; Adrienne A Hammond; Thomas Mosley; Janette Cortez; Tracy Gray; Jane A Colmer-Hamood; Mayank Shashtri; Julian E Spallholz; Abdul N Hamood; Ted W Reid
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections: how should we treat them?

Authors:  Christian van Delden
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 5.283

10.  Infections in a surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital in Greece.

Authors:  Haridimos Markogiannakis; Nikoleta Pachylaki; Eleni Samara; Melpomeni Kalderi; Maria Minettou; Marina Toutouza; Konstantinos G Toutouzas; Dimitrios Theodorou; Stilianos Katsaragakis
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 3.623

View more
  1 in total

1.  Antimicrobial Blue Light Inactivation of Gram-Negative Pathogens in Biofilms: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies.

Authors:  Yucheng Wang; Ximing Wu; Jia Chen; Rehab Amin; Min Lu; Brijesh Bhayana; Jie Zhao; Clinton K Murray; Michael R Hamblin; David C Hooper; Tianhong Dai
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 5.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.