Literature DB >> 26712068

New trends in breast cancer surgery: a therapeutic approach increasingly efficacy and respectful of the patient.

G Franceschini, A Martin Sanchez, A Di Leone, S Magno, F Moschella, C Accetta, R Masetti.   

Abstract

The surgical management of breast cancer has undergone continuous and profound changes over the last 40 years. The evolution from aggressive and mutilating treatment to conservative approach has been long, but constant, despite the controversies that appeared every time a new procedure came to light. Today, the aesthetic satisfaction of breast cancer patients coupled with the oncological safety is the goal of the modern breast surgeon. Breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy is considered the gold standard approach for patients with early stage breast cancer and the recent introduction of "oncoplastic techniques" has furtherly increased the use of breast-conserving procedures. Mastectomy remains a valid surgical alternative in selected cases and is usually associated with immediate reconstructive procedures. New surgical procedures called "conservative mastectomies" are emerging as techniques that combine oncological safety and cosmesis by entirely removing the breast parenchyma sparing the breast skin and nipple-areola complex. Staging of the axilla has also gradually evolved toward less aggressive approaches with the adoption of sentinel node biopsy and new therapeutic strategies are emerging in patients with a pathological positivity in sentinel lymph node biopsy. The present work will highlight the new surgical treatment options increasingly efficacy and respectful of breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26712068      PMCID: PMC4732583          DOI: 10.11138/gchir/2015.36.4.145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  G Chir        ISSN: 0391-9005


  53 in total

1.  Pathologic features associated with nonsentinel lymph node metastases in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma in a sentinel lymph node.

Authors:  R R Turner; K U Chu; K Qi; L E Botnick; N M Hansen; E C Glass; A E Giuliano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Preliminary outcome analysis in patients with breast cancer and a positive sentinel lymph node who declined axillary dissection.

Authors:  Jerri S Fant; Michael D Grant; Sally M Knox; Sheryl A Livingston; Kimberly Ridl; Ronald C Jones; Joseph A Kuhn
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Treatment of 100 patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer without further axillary dissection.

Authors:  R M Roumen; G P Kuijt; I H Liem; M W van Beek
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  Margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the Society of Surgical Oncology/American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline.

Authors:  Thomas A Buchholz; Mark R Somerfield; Jennifer J Griggs; Souzan El-Eid; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Gary H Lyman; Ginny Mason; Lisa A Newman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Prospective observational study of sentinel lymphadenectomy without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  A E Giuliano; P I Haigh; M B Brennan; N M Hansen; M C Kelley; W Ye; E C Glass; R R Turner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 13. Sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  J Cantin; H Scarth; M Levine; M Hugi
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer.

Authors:  J J Albertini; G H Lyman; C Cox; T Yeatman; L Balducci; N Ku; S Shivers; C Berman; K Wells; D Rapaport; A Shons; J Horton; H Greenberg; S Nicosia; R Clark; A Cantor; D S Reintgen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The risk of axillary relapse after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is comparable with that of axillary lymph node dissection: a follow-up study of 4008 procedures.

Authors:  Arpana M Naik; Jane Fey; Mary Gemignani; Alexandra Heerdt; Leslie Montgomery; Jeanne Petrek; Elisa Port; Virgilio Sacchini; Lisa Sclafani; Kimberly VanZee; Raquel Wagman; Patrick I Borgen; Hiram S Cody
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Natale Cascinelli; Luigi Mariani; Marco Greco; Roberto Saccozzi; Alberto Luini; Marisel Aguilar; Ettore Marubini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  9 in total

1.  Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.

Authors:  Andrea L Pusic; Evan Matros; Neil Fine; Edward Buchel; Gayle M Gordillo; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Ji Qi; Claudia Albornoz; Anne F Klassen; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Budget impact analysis of HARMONIC FOCUS™+ Shears for mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with axillary lymph node dissection compared with monopolar electrocautery from an Italian hospital perspective.

Authors:  Alessandra Piemontese; Thibaut Galvain; Lirazel Swindells; Vito Parago; Giovanni Tommaselli; Nadine Jamous
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 3.  Oncoplastic central quadrantectomies.

Authors:  Vittorio Pasta; Valerio D'Orazi; Raffaele Merola; Federico Frusone; Maria Ida Amabile; Alessandro De Luca; Rosanna Buè; Marco Monti
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-08

4.  Development of a surgical algorithm by using pre-operative imaging to predict mammoplasty cosmetic outcomes for large non-malignant tumours.

Authors:  Geok-Hoon Lim; Ruey Pyng Ng; Lester Chee Hao Leong
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12

Review 5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Hang Cheng; Jeffrey W Clymer; Nicole C Ferko; Leena Patel; Ireena M Soleas; Chris G Cameron; Piet Hinoul
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2016-07-18

6.  Prediction of total hospital expenses of patients undergoing breast cancer surgery in Shanghai, China by comparing three models.

Authors:  Minjie Chen; Xiaopin Wu; Jidong Zhang; Enhong Dong
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Triple-negative breast cancer: current treatment strategies and factors of negative prognosis.

Authors:  Anna Baranova; Mykola Krasnoselskyi; Volodymyr Starikov; Sergii Kartashov; Igor Zhulkevych; Vadym Vlasenko; Kateryna Oleshko; Olga Bilodid; Marina Sadchikova; Yurii Vinnyk
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2022-02

8.  Sub-Muscular Direct-to-Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Previously Irradiated Patients Avoiding the Use of ADM: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Lucrezia Pacchioni; Gianluca Sapino; Irene Laura Lusetti; Giovanna Zaccaria; Pietro G Di Summa; Giorgio De Santis
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  Effect of breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy on operation index, symptom checklist-90 score and prognosis in patients with early breast cancer.

Authors:  Han Qiu; Wen-Hui Xu; Jun Kong; Xiao-Jun Ding; Deng-Feng Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.