Literature DB >> 24711553

Margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the Society of Surgical Oncology/American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline.

Thomas A Buchholz1, Mark R Somerfield, Jennifer J Griggs, Souzan El-Eid, M Elizabeth H Hammond, Gary H Lyman, Ginny Mason, Lisa A Newman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO)/American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) guideline on surgical margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer was considered for endorsement.
METHODS: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has a policy and set of procedures for endorsing practice guidelines developed by other organizations. ASCO staff reviewed the SSO/ASTRO guideline for developmental rigor; an ASCO ad hoc review panel of experts reviewed the guideline content.
RESULTS: The ASCO ad hoc guideline review panel concurred that the recommendations are clear, thorough, and based on the most relevant scientific evidence in this content area and that they present options acceptable to patients. According to the SSO/ASTRO guideline, the use of no ink on tumor (ie, no cancer cells adjacent to any inked edge/surface of specimen) as the standard for an adequate margin in invasive cancer in the era of multidisciplinary therapy is associated with low rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and has the potential to decrease re-excision rates, improve cosmetic outcomes, and decrease health care costs.
CONCLUSION: The ASCO review panel endorses the SSO/ASTRO recommendations with qualifications, as follows. The panel reinforces and amplifies the guideline authors' call for the monitoring of outcomes of the guideline at the institutional level, as institutions transition to adopting the SSO/ASTRO recommendations; would place greater emphasis on the importance of postlumpectomy mammography for cases involving microcalcifications; and calls for flexibility in the application of the guideline in light of the generally weak evidence supporting the recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24711553     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  43 in total

1.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens in early colorectal cancer: lateral margins, macroscopic techniques, and possible pitfalls.

Authors:  Alicia Dessain; Christophe Snauwaert; Pamela Baldin; Pierre Deprez; Louis Libbrecht; Hubert Piessevaux; Anne Jouret-Mourin
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Technical success, technique efficacy and complications of minimally-invasive imaging-guided percutaneous ablation procedures of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giovanni Mauri; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori; Maria Paola Fedeli; Marco Alì; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  An Uncommon Pairing of common Tumors: Case Report of Ductal Carcinoma in situ Within Fibroadenoma.

Authors:  Ashley Marumoto; Susan Steinemann; Nancy Furumoto; Stacey Woodruff
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2019-02

4.  [Update of the German S3 breast cancer guideline : What is new for pathologists?]

Authors:  A Lebeau; C Denkert; P Sinn; M Schmidt; A Wöckel
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  The approach to an isolated close anterior margin in breast conserving surgery.

Authors:  L O'Connell; S Walsh; D Evoy; A O'Doherty; C Quinn; J Rothwell; J Geraghty; E W McDermott; R Prichard
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Surgical Options and Locoregional Recurrence in Patients Diagnosed with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast.

Authors:  Yasuaki Sagara; William T Barry; Melissa Anne Mallory; Ines Vaz-Luis; Fatih Aydogan; Jane E Brock; Eric P Winer; Mehra Golshan; Otto Metzger-Filho
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Nondestructive tissue analysis for ex vivo and in vivo cancer diagnosis using a handheld mass spectrometry system.

Authors:  Jialing Zhang; John Rector; John Q Lin; Jonathan H Young; Marta Sans; Nitesh Katta; Noah Giese; Wendong Yu; Chandandeep Nagi; James Suliburk; Jinsong Liu; Alena Bensussan; Rachel J DeHoog; Kyana Y Garza; Benjamin Ludolph; Anna G Sorace; Anum Syed; Aydin Zahedivash; Thomas E Milner; Livia S Eberlin
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 8.  New trends in breast cancer surgery: a therapeutic approach increasingly efficacy and respectful of the patient.

Authors:  G Franceschini; A Martin Sanchez; A Di Leone; S Magno; F Moschella; C Accetta; R Masetti
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

9.  Breast MR imaging for the assessment of residual disease following initial surgery for breast cancer with positive margins.

Authors:  Julia Krammer; Elissa R Price; Maxine S Jochelson; Elizabeth Watson; Melissa P Murray; Stefan O Schoenberg; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Prognostic Factors for Local, Loco-regional and Systemic Recurrence in Early-stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  A Kümmel; S Kümmel; J Barinoff; F Heitz; J Holtschmidt; W Weikel; F Lorenz-Salehi; A du Bois; P Harter; A Traut; J U Blohmer; B Ataseven
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.