Thomas A Buchholz1, Mark R Somerfield, Jennifer J Griggs, Souzan El-Eid, M Elizabeth H Hammond, Gary H Lyman, Ginny Mason, Lisa A Newman. 1. Thomas A. Buchholz, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jennifer J. Griggs, Lisa A. Newman, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Care Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Souzan El-Eid, Summerlin Breast Center; US Oncology, Las Vegas, NV; M. Elizabeth H. Hammond, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT; Gary H. Lyman, Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Ginny Mason, Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation, West Lafayette, IN.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO)/American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) guideline on surgical margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer was considered for endorsement. METHODS: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has a policy and set of procedures for endorsing practice guidelines developed by other organizations. ASCO staff reviewed the SSO/ASTRO guideline for developmental rigor; an ASCO ad hoc review panel of experts reviewed the guideline content. RESULTS: The ASCO ad hoc guideline review panel concurred that the recommendations are clear, thorough, and based on the most relevant scientific evidence in this content area and that they present options acceptable to patients. According to the SSO/ASTRO guideline, the use of no ink on tumor (ie, no cancer cells adjacent to any inked edge/surface of specimen) as the standard for an adequate margin in invasive cancer in the era of multidisciplinary therapy is associated with low rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and has the potential to decrease re-excision rates, improve cosmetic outcomes, and decrease health care costs. CONCLUSION: The ASCO review panel endorses the SSO/ASTRO recommendations with qualifications, as follows. The panel reinforces and amplifies the guideline authors' call for the monitoring of outcomes of the guideline at the institutional level, as institutions transition to adopting the SSO/ASTRO recommendations; would place greater emphasis on the importance of postlumpectomy mammography for cases involving microcalcifications; and calls for flexibility in the application of the guideline in light of the generally weak evidence supporting the recommendations.
PURPOSE: The Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO)/American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) guideline on surgical margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer was considered for endorsement. METHODS: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has a policy and set of procedures for endorsing practice guidelines developed by other organizations. ASCO staff reviewed the SSO/ASTRO guideline for developmental rigor; an ASCO ad hoc review panel of experts reviewed the guideline content. RESULTS: The ASCO ad hoc guideline review panel concurred that the recommendations are clear, thorough, and based on the most relevant scientific evidence in this content area and that they present options acceptable to patients. According to the SSO/ASTRO guideline, the use of no ink on tumor (ie, no cancer cells adjacent to any inked edge/surface of specimen) as the standard for an adequate margin in invasive cancer in the era of multidisciplinary therapy is associated with low rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and has the potential to decrease re-excision rates, improve cosmetic outcomes, and decrease health care costs. CONCLUSION: The ASCO review panel endorses the SSO/ASTRO recommendations with qualifications, as follows. The panel reinforces and amplifies the guideline authors' call for the monitoring of outcomes of the guideline at the institutional level, as institutions transition to adopting the SSO/ASTRO recommendations; would place greater emphasis on the importance of postlumpectomy mammography for cases involving microcalcifications; and calls for flexibility in the application of the guideline in light of the generally weak evidence supporting the recommendations.
Authors: Giovanni Mauri; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori; Maria Paola Fedeli; Marco Alì; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Sardanelli Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: L O'Connell; S Walsh; D Evoy; A O'Doherty; C Quinn; J Rothwell; J Geraghty; E W McDermott; R Prichard Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Yasuaki Sagara; William T Barry; Melissa Anne Mallory; Ines Vaz-Luis; Fatih Aydogan; Jane E Brock; Eric P Winer; Mehra Golshan; Otto Metzger-Filho Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-04-18 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Jialing Zhang; John Rector; John Q Lin; Jonathan H Young; Marta Sans; Nitesh Katta; Noah Giese; Wendong Yu; Chandandeep Nagi; James Suliburk; Jinsong Liu; Alena Bensussan; Rachel J DeHoog; Kyana Y Garza; Benjamin Ludolph; Anna G Sorace; Anum Syed; Aydin Zahedivash; Thomas E Milner; Livia S Eberlin Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2017-09-06 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Julia Krammer; Elissa R Price; Maxine S Jochelson; Elizabeth Watson; Melissa P Murray; Stefan O Schoenberg; Elizabeth A Morris Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: A Kümmel; S Kümmel; J Barinoff; F Heitz; J Holtschmidt; W Weikel; F Lorenz-Salehi; A du Bois; P Harter; A Traut; J U Blohmer; B Ataseven Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 2.915