Literature DB >> 15319717

The risk of axillary relapse after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is comparable with that of axillary lymph node dissection: a follow-up study of 4008 procedures.

Arpana M Naik1, Jane Fey, Mary Gemignani, Alexandra Heerdt, Leslie Montgomery, Jeanne Petrek, Elisa Port, Virgilio Sacchini, Lisa Sclafani, Kimberly VanZee, Raquel Wagman, Patrick I Borgen, Hiram S Cody.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the rate of axillary recurrence after sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: SLN biopsy is a new standard of care for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer. Nevertheless, most validated series of SLN biopsy confirm that the SLN is falsely negative in 5-10% of node-positive cases, and few studies report the rate of axillary local recurrence (LR) for that subset of patients staged by SLN biopsy alone.
METHODS: Through December of 2002, 4008 consecutive SLN biopsy procedures were performed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center for unilateral invasive breast cancer. Patients were categorized in 4 groups: SLN-negative with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND; n = 326), SLN-negative without ALND (n = 2340), SLN-positive with ALND (n = 1132), and SLN-positive without ALND (n = 210). Clinical and pathologic characteristics and follow-up data for each of the 4 cohorts were evaluated with emphasis on patterns of axillary LR.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 1-75), axillary LR occurred in 10/4008 (0.25%) patients overall. In 3 cases (0.07%) the axillary LR was the first site of treatment failure, in 4 (0.1%) it was coincident with breast LR, and in 3 (0.07%) it was coincident with distant metastases. Axillary LR was more frequent among the unconventionally treated SLN-positive/no ALND patients than in the other 3 conventionally treated cohorts (1.4% versus 0.18%, P = 0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: Axillary LR after SLN biopsy, with or without ALND, is a rare event, and this low relapse rate supports wider use of SLN biopsy for breast cancer staging. There is a low-risk subset of SLN-positive patients in whom completion ALND may not be required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15319717      PMCID: PMC1356436          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000137130.23530.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  40 in total

1.  Pathologic analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  L Liberman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Radiation safety of the sentinel lymph node technique in breast cancer.

Authors:  W A Waddington; M R Keshtgar; I Taylor; S R Lakhani; M D Short; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-04

Review 3.  Axillary recurrence after a negative sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: incidence and clinical significance.

Authors:  Marjolein L Smidt; Caroline M M Janssen; Deborah M Kuster; Erik D M Bruggink; Luc J A Strobbe
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Treatment of 100 patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer without further axillary dissection.

Authors:  R M Roumen; G P Kuijt; I H Liem; M W van Beek
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy as an indicator for axillary dissection in early breast cancer.

Authors:  U Veronesi; V Galimberti; S Zurrida; F Pigatto; P Veronesi; C Robertson; G Paganelli; V Sciascia; G Viale
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Dermal injection of radioactive colloid is superior to peritumoral injection for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy: results of a multiinstitutional study.

Authors:  K M McMasters; S L Wong; R C Martin; C Chao; T M Tuttle; R D Noyes; D J Carlson; A L Laidley; T Q McGlothin; P B Ley; C M Brown; R L Glaser; R E Pennington; P S Turk; D Simpson; P B Cerrito; M J Edwards
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Intradermal isotope injection is superior to intramammary in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer.

Authors:  R C Martin; A M Derossis; J Fey; H Yeung; S D Yeh; T Akhurst; A S Heerdt; J Petrek; K J VanZee; L L Montgomery; P I Borgen; H S Cody
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Prospective observational study of sentinel lymphadenectomy without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  A E Giuliano; P I Haigh; M B Brennan; N M Hansen; M C Kelley; W Ye; E C Glass; R R Turner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: a suitable alternative to routine axillary dissection in multi-institutional practice when optimal technique is used.

Authors:  K M McMasters; T M Tuttle; D J Carlson; C M Brown; R D Noyes; R L Glaser; D J Vennekotter; P S Turk; P S Tate; A Sardi; P B Cerrito; M J Edwards
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer using both technetium sulfur colloid and isosulfan blue dye.

Authors:  L Tafra; D R Lannin; M S Swanson; K M Verbanac; A N Chua; P C Ng; M S Edwards; B E Halliday; C A Henry; L M Sommers; C M Carman; M R Molin; J E Yurko; R R Perry; R Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  54 in total

1.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Lisa A Newman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Sentinel node biopsy and selective lymph node clearance--impact on regional control and survival in breast cancer and melanoma.

Authors:  Omgo E Nieweg; Maartje C van Rijk; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Cornelis A Hoefnagel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  A declining rate of completion axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients is associated with the use of a multivariate nomogram.

Authors:  Julia Park; Jane V Fey; Arpana M Naik; Patrick I Borgen; Kimberly J Van Zee; Hiram S Cody
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Recent developments in breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  F Fitzal; O Riedl; R Jakesz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  New concepts in axillary management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Can Atalay
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

Review 6.  Meta-analytic comparison of randomized and nonrandomized studies of breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Janet P Edwards; Elizabeth J Kelly; Yongtao Lin; Taryn Lenders; William A Ghali; Andrew J Graham
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Axillary lymph node dissection for sentinel lymph node micrometastases may be safely omitted in early-stage breast cancer patients: long-term outcomes of a prospective study.

Authors:  Igor Langer; Ulrich Guller; Carsten T Viehl; Holger Moch; Edward Wight; Felix Harder; Daniel Oertli; Markus Zuber
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-08-07

8.  Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Viviana Galimberti; Bernard F Cole; Stefano Zurrida; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Paolo Veronesi; Paola Baratella; Camelia Chifu; Manuela Sargenti; Mattia Intra; Oreste Gentilini; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Giovanni Mazzarol; Samuele Massarut; Jean-Rémi Garbay; Janez Zgajnar; Hanne Galatius; Angelo Recalcati; David Littlejohn; Monika Bamert; Marco Colleoni; Karen N Price; Meredith M Regan; Aron Goldhirsch; Alan S Coates; Richard D Gelber; Umberto Veronesi
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Sentinel node identification rate and nodal involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial.

Authors:  Marieke E Straver; Philip Meijnen; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Robert E Mansel; Jan Bogaerts; Nicole Duez; Luigi Cataliotti; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Helen A Westenberg; Huub van der Mijle; Marko Snoj; Coen Hurkmans; Emiel J T Rutgers
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Breast cancer in young women and its impact on reproductive function.

Authors:  M Hickey; M Peate; C M Saunders; M Friedlander
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 15.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.