OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the rate of axillary recurrence after sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: SLN biopsy is a new standard of care for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer. Nevertheless, most validated series of SLN biopsy confirm that the SLN is falsely negative in 5-10% of node-positive cases, and few studies report the rate of axillary local recurrence (LR) for that subset of patients staged by SLN biopsy alone. METHODS: Through December of 2002, 4008 consecutive SLN biopsy procedures were performed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center for unilateral invasive breast cancer. Patients were categorized in 4 groups: SLN-negative with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND; n = 326), SLN-negative without ALND (n = 2340), SLN-positive with ALND (n = 1132), and SLN-positive without ALND (n = 210). Clinical and pathologic characteristics and follow-up data for each of the 4 cohorts were evaluated with emphasis on patterns of axillary LR. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 1-75), axillary LR occurred in 10/4008 (0.25%) patients overall. In 3 cases (0.07%) the axillary LR was the first site of treatment failure, in 4 (0.1%) it was coincident with breast LR, and in 3 (0.07%) it was coincident with distant metastases. Axillary LR was more frequent among the unconventionally treated SLN-positive/no ALND patients than in the other 3 conventionally treated cohorts (1.4% versus 0.18%, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Axillary LR after SLN biopsy, with or without ALND, is a rare event, and this low relapse rate supports wider use of SLN biopsy for breast cancer staging. There is a low-risk subset of SLN-positive patients in whom completion ALND may not be required.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the rate of axillary recurrence after sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: SLN biopsy is a new standard of care for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer. Nevertheless, most validated series of SLN biopsy confirm that the SLN is falsely negative in 5-10% of node-positive cases, and few studies report the rate of axillary local recurrence (LR) for that subset of patients staged by SLN biopsy alone. METHODS: Through December of 2002, 4008 consecutive SLN biopsy procedures were performed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center for unilateral invasive breast cancer. Patients were categorized in 4 groups: SLN-negative with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND; n = 326), SLN-negative without ALND (n = 2340), SLN-positive with ALND (n = 1132), and SLN-positive without ALND (n = 210). Clinical and pathologic characteristics and follow-up data for each of the 4 cohorts were evaluated with emphasis on patterns of axillary LR. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 1-75), axillary LR occurred in 10/4008 (0.25%) patients overall. In 3 cases (0.07%) the axillary LR was the first site of treatment failure, in 4 (0.1%) it was coincident with breast LR, and in 3 (0.07%) it was coincident with distant metastases. Axillary LR was more frequent among the unconventionally treated SLN-positive/no ALND patients than in the other 3 conventionally treated cohorts (1.4% versus 0.18%, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Axillary LR after SLN biopsy, with or without ALND, is a rare event, and this low relapse rate supports wider use of SLN biopsy for breast cancer staging. There is a low-risk subset of SLN-positive patients in whom completion ALND may not be required.
Authors: Marjolein L Smidt; Caroline M M Janssen; Deborah M Kuster; Erik D M Bruggink; Luc J A Strobbe Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: U Veronesi; V Galimberti; S Zurrida; F Pigatto; P Veronesi; C Robertson; G Paganelli; V Sciascia; G Viale Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: K M McMasters; S L Wong; R C Martin; C Chao; T M Tuttle; R D Noyes; D J Carlson; A L Laidley; T Q McGlothin; P B Ley; C M Brown; R L Glaser; R E Pennington; P S Turk; D Simpson; P B Cerrito; M J Edwards Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: R C Martin; A M Derossis; J Fey; H Yeung; S D Yeh; T Akhurst; A S Heerdt; J Petrek; K J VanZee; L L Montgomery; P I Borgen; H S Cody Journal: Surgery Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: A E Giuliano; P I Haigh; M B Brennan; N M Hansen; M C Kelley; W Ye; E C Glass; R R Turner Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K M McMasters; T M Tuttle; D J Carlson; C M Brown; R D Noyes; R L Glaser; D J Vennekotter; P S Turk; P S Tate; A Sardi; P B Cerrito; M J Edwards Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: L Tafra; D R Lannin; M S Swanson; K M Verbanac; A N Chua; P C Ng; M S Edwards; B E Halliday; C A Henry; L M Sommers; C M Carman; M R Molin; J E Yurko; R R Perry; R Williams Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Omgo E Nieweg; Maartje C van Rijk; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Cornelis A Hoefnagel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Julia Park; Jane V Fey; Arpana M Naik; Patrick I Borgen; Kimberly J Van Zee; Hiram S Cody Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Janet P Edwards; Elizabeth J Kelly; Yongtao Lin; Taryn Lenders; William A Ghali; Andrew J Graham Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Igor Langer; Ulrich Guller; Carsten T Viehl; Holger Moch; Edward Wight; Felix Harder; Daniel Oertli; Markus Zuber Journal: Indian J Surg Oncol Date: 2010-08-07
Authors: Viviana Galimberti; Bernard F Cole; Stefano Zurrida; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Paolo Veronesi; Paola Baratella; Camelia Chifu; Manuela Sargenti; Mattia Intra; Oreste Gentilini; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Giovanni Mazzarol; Samuele Massarut; Jean-Rémi Garbay; Janez Zgajnar; Hanne Galatius; Angelo Recalcati; David Littlejohn; Monika Bamert; Marco Colleoni; Karen N Price; Meredith M Regan; Aron Goldhirsch; Alan S Coates; Richard D Gelber; Umberto Veronesi Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Marieke E Straver; Philip Meijnen; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Robert E Mansel; Jan Bogaerts; Nicole Duez; Luigi Cataliotti; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Helen A Westenberg; Huub van der Mijle; Marko Snoj; Coen Hurkmans; Emiel J T Rutgers Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-03-19 Impact factor: 5.344