Literature DB >> 26709178

Antibiotic use in dairy herds in the Netherlands from 2005 to 2012.

A Kuipers1, W J Koops2, H Wemmenhove3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the variation in antibiotic use and the effects of external factors on trends in antibiotic use at the herd level by using the number of daily dosages as an indicator for antibiotic use. For this purpose, antibiotic use was analyzed in 94 dairy herds in the Netherlands from 2005 to 2012. The herds were divided into 3 groups of farmers: one group was guided in their antibiotic use from 2008 to 2010 as part of the project, whereas the other 2 groups were not actively guided. The farms were located in 10 of the 12 provinces and were clients of 32 of the 300 veterinary practices that treat cattle. Sales invoices from the veterinary practices provided the antibiotic and cost data for the participating farmers. The number of animal-defined daily dosages (ADDD) indicates the number of days per year that the average cow in a herd is given antibiotic treatment. The average ADDD for all farms from 2005 to 2012 was 5.86 (standard deviation=2.14); 68% of ADDD were used for udder health, 24% for clinical mastitis and 44% for dry-cow therapy. Variation in ADDD among herds decreased during the study period. The trend in ADDD can be described as having 3 phases: (1) a period of increasing use coinciding with little public concern about antibiotic use (2005-2007), (2) a period of growing awareness and stabilization of use (2007-2010), and (3) a period of decreasing use coinciding with increasing societal concerns (2010-2012). The greatest reduction in use was for drugs other than those used to treat the udder. Drug use for mastitis treatment fell considerably in the final year of the study period, whereas farmers were reluctant to reduce use for dry-cow therapy. Almost 40% of the herds were given less than 2.5 ADDD for dry-cow therapy, which is equivalent to 2.5 tubes per average cow in the herd, and 20% used more than 3 tubes per cow. Use of third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones dropped from 18% of ADDD during 2005 to 2010 to 1% in 2012, with a shift toward penicillins and broad spectrum drugs. The ADDD was 22% lower in 2012 than 2007, the year of the highest usage. The decrease in ADDD over time varied between the 3 groups of farmers. During the second phase of the study, the guided group began to display a reduction in use, whereas the other groups only displayed a significant reduction in the third phase. The reduction in antibiotic use has resulted in lower veterinary costs per cow in recent years.
Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibiotic use; dairy farmer group; treatment category; variation and trend

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26709178     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  35 in total

1.  Using High-Resolution Differential Cell Counts (HRDCCs) in Bovine Milk and Blood to Monitor the Immune Status over the Entire Lactation Period.

Authors:  Sabine Farschtschi; Alex Hildebrandt; Martin Mattes; Benedikt Kirchner; Michael W Pfaffl
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Calves as Main Reservoir of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Dairy Farms.

Authors:  Barbara Salerno; Matteo Cornaggia; Raffaella Sabatino; Andrea Di Cesare; Maddalena Furlan; Lisa Barco; Massimiliano Orsini; Benedetta Cordioli; Claudio Mantovani; Luca Bano; Carmen Losasso
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  Milk Quality and Safety in a One Health Perspective: Results of a Prevalence Study on Dairy Herds in Lombardy (Italy).

Authors:  Valerio M Sora; Sara Panseri; Maria Nobile; Federica Di Cesare; Gabriele Meroni; Luca M Chiesa; Alfonso Zecconi
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25

4.  Identification of Escherichia coli and Trueperella pyogenes isolated from the uterus of dairy cows using routine bacteriological testing and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  María Jaureguiberry; Laura Vanina Madoz; Mauricio Javier Giuliodori; Karen Wagener; Isabella Prunner; Tom Grunert; Monika Ehling-Schulz; Marc Drillich; Rodolfo Luzbel de la Sota
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 1.695

5.  Quantifying Preferences of Farmers and Veterinarians for National Animal Health Programs: The Example of Bovine Mastitis and Antimicrobial Usage in Switzerland.

Authors:  Bart H P van den Borne; Felix J S van Soest; Martin Reist; Henk Hogeveen
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-06-02

Review 6.  The RESET Mindset Model applied on decreasing antibiotic usage in dairy cattle in the Netherlands.

Authors:  T J G M Lam; J Jansen; R J Wessels
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.146

7.  Prevailing practices in the use of antibiotics by dairy farmers in Eastern Haryana region of India.

Authors:  Vikash Kumar; Jancy Gupta
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2018-03-04

Review 8.  Staphylococcus aureus in Agriculture: Lessons in Evolution from a Multispecies Pathogen.

Authors:  Soyoun Park; Jennifer Ronholm
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Antimicrobial consumption on Austrian dairy farms: an observational study of udder disease treatments based on veterinary medication records.

Authors:  Clair L Firth; Annemarie Käsbohrer; Corina Schleicher; Klemens Fuchs; Christa Egger-Danner; Martin Mayerhofer; Hermann Schobesberger; Josef Köfer; Walter Obritzhauser
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Comparative effectiveness of individualised homeopathy and antibiotics in the treatment of bovine clinical mastitis: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Diana Keller; Albert Sundrum
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 2.695

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.