Literature DB >> 26707858

Determinants of operator and patient radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization: Insights from the RadiCure (RADIation reduction during cardiac catheterization using real-timE monitoring) trial.

Georgios Christopoulos1, Aristotelis C Papayannis1, Mohammed Alomar1, Georgios E Christakopoulos1, Anna Kotsia1, Tesfaldet T Michael1, Bavana V Rangan1, Michele Roesle1, Deborah Shorrock1, Lorenza Makke1, Spyros Maragkoudakis2, Atif Mohammad1, Karan Sarode1, Charles E Chambers3, Subhash Banerjee1, Emmanouil S Brilakis1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the RadiCure study 505 catheterization procedures were 1:1 randomized to use or no use of real-time radiation monitoring. Use of the Bleeper Sv monitor resulted in a significant reduction in operator radiation exposure.
METHODS: We examined the association between several baseline and procedural parameters with operator and patient radiation exposure using univariable and multivariable analysis in the 505 patients that were enrolled in RadiCure. All baseline demographic and procedure characteristics recorded were included in the univariable analysis.
RESULTS: Median fluoroscopy time was 6.2 (2.5-12.5) minutes, median patient air kerma dose was 0.908 (0.602-1.636) Gray and median first operator exposure was 10 (5-22) μSv. For analysis purposes, the 505 procedures were dichotomized based on the median operator exposure (10 μSv) and median patient radiation dose (0.908 Gray). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with high (above median or >10 μSv) first operator radiation exposure included radial access (odds ratio [OR] 5.44, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.88-10.76), chronic total occlusion (CTO) intervention (OR 12.78, 95% CI 4.42-43.60), real-time radiation monitoring (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26-0.66), and use of a radioabsorbent drape (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.28-0.96). High patient radiation dose (above median or >0.908 Gray) was associated with body mass index>30 kg/m2 (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.99-5.29), prior MI (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.29-4.04), prior cerebrovascular disease (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.75), hypertension (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.05-5.82), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.40-4.39) and CTO intervention (OR 12.93, 95% CI 3.28-87.31), but was not associated with real-time radiation monitoring and use of a radioabsorbent drape.
CONCLUSIONS: Several clinical and procedural factors are associated with higher patient and operator radiation exposure. Real-time radiation monitoring and use of disposable radiation shields were associated with lower operator, but not patient, radiation dose.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac catheterization; quality improvement; radiation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26707858     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  3 in total

1.  Effective Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Cardiac Catheterization.

Authors:  Alejandro Gutiérrez-Barrios; Hugo Camacho-Galán; Francisco Medina-Camacho; Dolores Cañadas-Pruaño; Antonio Jimenez-Moreno; German Calle-Perez; Rafael Vázquez-García
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2019-06-01

2.  Retrospective study of patients radiation dose during cardiac catheterization procedures.

Authors:  Beverley Osei; Lu Xu; Amanda Johnston; Sara Darko; Johnson Darko; Ernest Osei
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Reduction of radiation exposure using low pulse rate fluoroscopy during neuroendovascular surgery.

Authors:  Takeshi Shimizu; Shingo Toyota; Kanji Nakagawa; Tomoaki Murakami; Tetsuya Kumagai; Kanji Mori; Takuyu Taki
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 1.610

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.