Jihun Kim1, Kazuhiro Saitou2, Martha M Matuszak3, James M Balter3. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. jkim115@mgh.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A finite element (FE) head and neck model was developed as a tool to aid investigations and development of deformable image registration and patient modeling in radiation oncology. Useful aspects of a FE model for these purposes include ability to produce realistic deformations (similar to those seen in patients over the course of treatment) and a rational means of generating new configurations, e.g., via the application of force and/or displacement boundary conditions. METHODS: The model was constructed based on a cone-beam computed tomography image of a head and neck cancer patient. The three-node triangular surface meshes created for the bony elements (skull, mandible, and cervical spine) and joint elements were integrated into a skeletal system and combined with the exterior surface. Nodes were additionally created inside the surface structures which were composed of the three-node triangular surface meshes, so that four-node tetrahedral FE elements were created over the whole region of the model. The bony elements were modeled as a homogeneous linear elastic material connected by intervertebral disks. The surrounding tissues were modeled as a homogeneous linear elastic material. Under force or displacement boundary conditions, FE analysis on the model calculates approximate solutions of the displacement vector field. RESULTS: A FE head and neck model was constructed that skull, mandible, and cervical vertebrae were mechanically connected by disks. The developed FE model is capable of generating realistic deformations that are strain-free for the bony elements and of creating new configurations of the skeletal system with the surrounding tissues reasonably deformed. CONCLUSIONS: The FE model can generate realistic deformations for skeletal elements. In addition, the model provides a way of evaluating the accuracy of image alignment methods by producing a ground truth deformation and correspondingly simulated images. The ability to combine force and displacement conditions provides flexibility for simulating realistic anatomic configurations.
PURPOSE: A finite element (FE) head and neck model was developed as a tool to aid investigations and development of deformable image registration and patient modeling in radiation oncology. Useful aspects of a FE model for these purposes include ability to produce realistic deformations (similar to those seen in patients over the course of treatment) and a rational means of generating new configurations, e.g., via the application of force and/or displacement boundary conditions. METHODS: The model was constructed based on a cone-beam computed tomography image of a head and neck cancerpatient. The three-node triangular surface meshes created for the bony elements (skull, mandible, and cervical spine) and joint elements were integrated into a skeletal system and combined with the exterior surface. Nodes were additionally created inside the surface structures which were composed of the three-node triangular surface meshes, so that four-node tetrahedral FE elements were created over the whole region of the model. The bony elements were modeled as a homogeneous linear elastic material connected by intervertebral disks. The surrounding tissues were modeled as a homogeneous linear elastic material. Under force or displacement boundary conditions, FE analysis on the model calculates approximate solutions of the displacement vector field. RESULTS: A FE head and neck model was constructed that skull, mandible, and cervical vertebrae were mechanically connected by disks. The developed FE model is capable of generating realistic deformations that are strain-free for the bony elements and of creating new configurations of the skeletal system with the surrounding tissues reasonably deformed. CONCLUSIONS: The FE model can generate realistic deformations for skeletal elements. In addition, the model provides a way of evaluating the accuracy of image alignment methods by producing a ground truth deformation and correspondingly simulated images. The ability to combine force and displacement conditions provides flexibility for simulating realistic anatomic configurations.
Entities:
Keywords:
Deformation; Finite element method; Head and neck; Image registration; Radiation therapy
Authors: Julia A Schnabel; Christine Tanner; Andy D Castellano-Smith; Andreas Degenhard; Martin O Leach; D Rodney Hose; Derek L G Hill; David J Hawkes Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Christine Tanner; Julia A Schnabel; Derek L G Hill; David J Hawkes; Martin O Leach; D Rodney Hose Journal: Med Phys Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Rojano Kashani; Martina Hub; James M Balter; Marc L Kessler; Lei Dong; Lifei Zhang; Lei Xing; Yaoqin Xie; David Hawkes; Julia A Schnabel; Jamie McClelland; Sarang Joshi; Quan Chen; Weiguo Lu Journal: Med Phys Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Grace G Zeng; Stephen L Breen; Andrew Bayley; Elizabeth White; Harald Keller; Laura Dawson; David A Jaffray Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2008-10-22 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Sajendra Nithiananthan; Sebastian Schafer; Ali Uneri; Daniel J Mirota; J Webster Stayman; Wojciech Zbijewski; Kristy K Brock; Michael J Daly; Harley Chan; Jonathan C Irish; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.071