Literature DB >> 21182659

Accommodating intraocular lenses: a review of design concepts, usage and assessment methods.

Amy L Sheppard1, Abar Bashir, James S Wolffsohn, Leon N Davies.   

Abstract

The correction of presbyopia and restoration of true accommodative function to the ageing eye is the focus of much ongoing research and clinical work. A range of accommodating intraocular lenses (AIOLs) implanted during cataract surgery has been developed and they are designed to change either their position or shape in response to ciliary muscle contraction to generate an increase in dioptric power. Two main design concepts exist. First, axial shift concepts rely on anterior axial movement of one or two optics creating accommodative ability. Second, curvature change designs are designed to provide significant amplitudes of accommodation with little physical displacement. Single-optic devices have been used most widely, although the true accommodative ability provided by forward shift of the optic appears limited and recent findings indicate that alternative factors such as flexing of the optic to alter ocular aberrations may be responsible for the enhanced near vision reported in published studies. Techniques for analysing the performance of AIOLs have not been standardised and clinical studies have reported findings using a wide range of both subjective and objective methods, making it difficult to gauge the success of these implants. There is a need for longitudinal studies using objective methods to assess long-term performance of AIOLs and to determine if true accommodation is restored by the designs available. While dual-optic and curvature change IOLs are designed to provide greater amplitudes of accommodation than is possible with single-optic devices, several of these implants are in the early stages of development and require significant further work before human use is possible. A number of challenges remain and must be addressed before the ultimate goal of restoring youthful levels of accommodation to the presbyopic eye can be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21182659     DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2010.00532.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Optom        ISSN: 0816-4622            Impact factor:   2.742


  14 in total

1.  Stretch-dependent changes in surface profiles of the human crystalline lens during accommodation: a finite element study.

Authors:  Hooman Mohammad Pour; Sangarapillai Kanapathipillai; Khosrow Zarrabi; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  High refractive index polysiloxane as injectable, in situ curable accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Hao; Justine L Jeffery; Tam P T Le; Gail McFarland; Graham Johnson; Roger J Mulder; Qian Garrett; Fabrice Manns; Derek Nankivil; Esdras Arrieta; Arthur Ho; Jean-Marie Parel; Timothy C Hughes
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Prediction of accommodative optical response in prepresbyopic subjects using ultrasound biomicroscopy.

Authors:  Viswanathan Ramasubramanian; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 4.  Clinical application of accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  You-Ling Liang; Song-Bai Jia
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Quantification of age-related and per diopter accommodative changes of the lens and ciliary muscle in the emmetropic human eye.

Authors:  Kathryn Richdale; Loraine T Sinnott; Mark A Bullimore; Peter A Wassenaar; Petra Schmalbrock; Chiu-Yen Kao; Samuel Patz; Donald O Mutti; Adrian Glasser; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 6.  Axial movement of the dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens for the correction of the presbyopia: optical performance and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Javier Tomás-Juan; Ane Murueta-Goyena Larrañaga
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-09-22

7.  EGF receptor inhibitor erlotinib as a potential pharmacological prophylaxis for posterior capsule opacification.

Authors:  C Wertheimer; R Liegl; M Kernt; W Mayer; D Docheva; A Kampik; K H Eibl-Lindner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  The Effect of Age, Accommodation, and Refractive Error on the Adult Human Eye.

Authors:  Kathryn Richdale; Mark A Bullimore; Loraine T Sinnott; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 9.  Translating ocular biomechanics into clinical practice: current state and future prospects.

Authors:  Michaël J A Girard; William J Dupps; Mani Baskaran; Giuliano Scarcelli; Seok H Yun; Harry A Quigley; Ian A Sigal; Nicholas G Strouthidis
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.424

Review 10.  Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.