James C Yao1, Nicola Fazio2, Simron Singh3, Roberto Buzzoni4, Carlo Carnaghi5, Edward Wolin6, Jiri Tomasek7, Markus Raderer8, Harald Lahner9, Maurizio Voi10, Lida Bubuteishvili Pacaud11, Nicolas Rouyrre11, Carolin Sachs11, Juan W Valle12, Gianfranco Delle Fave13, Eric Van Cutsem14, Margot Tesselaar15, Yasuhiro Shimada16, Do-Youn Oh17, Jonathan Strosberg18, Matthew H Kulke19, Marianne E Pavel20. 1. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: jyao@mdanderson.org. 2. Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan, Italy. 3. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. 5. IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy. 6. Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. 7. Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. 8. Univ. Klinik f. Innere Medizin I, AKH, Vienna, Austria. 9. Universitaetsklinikum Essen, Zentrum f. Innere Medizin, Essen, Germany. 10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA. 11. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. 12. Institute of Cancer Studies, University of Manchester, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK. 13. Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy. 14. University Hospitals Gasthuisberg/Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 15. Nederlands Kanker Instituut, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 16. National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 17. Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. 18. Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA. 19. Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 20. Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Effective systemic therapies for patients with advanced, progressive neuroendocrine tumours of the lung or gastrointestinal tract are scarce. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of everolimus compared with placebo in this patient population. METHODS: In the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 RADIANT-4 trial, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated, non-functional neuroendocrine tumours of lung or gastrointestinal origin were enrolled from 97 centres in 25 countries worldwide. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio by an interactive voice response system to receive everolimus 10 mg per day orally or identical placebo, both with supportive care. Patients were stratified by tumour origin, performance status, and previous somatostatin analogue treatment. Patients, investigators, and the study sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by central radiology review, analysed by intention to treat. Overall survival was a key secondary endpoint. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01524783. FINDINGS:Between April 3, 2012, and Aug 23, 2013, a total of 302 patients were enrolled, of whom 205 were allocated toeverolimus 10 mg per day and 97 to placebo. Median progression-free survival was 11·0 months (95% CI 9·2-13·3) in the everolimus group and 3·9 months (3·6-7·4) in the placebo group. Everolimus was associated with a 52% reduction in the estimated risk of progression or death (hazard ratio [HR] 0·48 [95% CI 0·35-0·67], p<0·00001). Although not statistically significant, the results of the first pre-planned interim overall survival analysis indicated that everolimus might be associated with a reduction in the risk of death (HR 0·64 [95% CI 0·40-1·05], one-sided p=0·037, whereas the boundary for statistical significance was 0·0002). Grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events were infrequent and included stomatitis (in 18 [9%] of 202 patients in the everolimus group vs 0 of 98 in the placebo group), diarrhoea (15 [7%] vs 2 [2%]), infections (14 [7%] vs 0), anaemia (8 [4%] vs 1 [1%]), fatigue (7 [3%] vs 1 [1%]), and hyperglycaemia (7 [3%] vs 0). INTERPRETATION: Treatment with everolimus was associated with significant improvement in progression-free survival in patients with progressive lung or gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours. The safety findings were consistent with the known side-effect profile of everolimus. Everolimus is the first targeted agent to show robust anti-tumour activity with acceptable tolerability across a broad range of neuroendocrine tumours, including those arising from the pancreas, lung, and gastrointestinal tract. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Effective systemic therapies for patients with advanced, progressive neuroendocrine tumours of the lung or gastrointestinal tract are scarce. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of everolimus compared with placebo in this patient population. METHODS: In the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 RADIANT-4 trial, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated, non-functional neuroendocrine tumours of lung or gastrointestinal origin were enrolled from 97 centres in 25 countries worldwide. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio by an interactive voice response system to receive everolimus 10 mg per day orally or identical placebo, both with supportive care. Patients were stratified by tumour origin, performance status, and previous somatostatin analogue treatment. Patients, investigators, and the study sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by central radiology review, analysed by intention to treat. Overall survival was a key secondary endpoint. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01524783. FINDINGS: Between April 3, 2012, and Aug 23, 2013, a total of 302 patients were enrolled, of whom 205 were allocated to everolimus 10 mg per day and 97 to placebo. Median progression-free survival was 11·0 months (95% CI 9·2-13·3) in the everolimus group and 3·9 months (3·6-7·4) in the placebo group. Everolimus was associated with a 52% reduction in the estimated risk of progression or death (hazard ratio [HR] 0·48 [95% CI 0·35-0·67], p<0·00001). Although not statistically significant, the results of the first pre-planned interim overall survival analysis indicated that everolimus might be associated with a reduction in the risk of death (HR 0·64 [95% CI 0·40-1·05], one-sided p=0·037, whereas the boundary for statistical significance was 0·0002). Grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events were infrequent and included stomatitis (in 18 [9%] of 202 patients in the everolimus group vs 0 of 98 in the placebo group), diarrhoea (15 [7%] vs 2 [2%]), infections (14 [7%] vs 0), anaemia (8 [4%] vs 1 [1%]), fatigue (7 [3%] vs 1 [1%]), and hyperglycaemia (7 [3%] vs 0). INTERPRETATION: Treatment with everolimus was associated with significant improvement in progression-free survival in patients with progressive lung or gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours. The safety findings were consistent with the known side-effect profile of everolimus. Everolimus is the first targeted agent to show robust anti-tumour activity with acceptable tolerability across a broad range of neuroendocrine tumours, including those arising from the pancreas, lung, and gastrointestinal tract. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Eric Raymond; Laetitia Dahan; Jean-Luc Raoul; Yung-Jue Bang; Ivan Borbath; Catherine Lombard-Bohas; Juan Valle; Peter Metrakos; Denis Smith; Aaron Vinik; Jen-Shi Chen; Dieter Hörsch; Pascal Hammel; Bertram Wiedenmann; Eric Van Cutsem; Shem Patyna; Dongrui Ray Lu; Carolyn Blanckmeister; Richard Chao; Philippe Ruszniewski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michaela S Banck; Rahul Kanwar; Amit A Kulkarni; Ganesh K Boora; Franziska Metge; Benjamin R Kipp; Lizhi Zhang; Erik C Thorland; Kay T Minn; Ramesh Tentu; Bruce W Eckloff; Eric D Wieben; Yanhong Wu; Julie M Cunningham; David M Nagorney; Judith A Gilbert; Matthew M Ames; Andreas S Beutler Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Anja Rinke; Hans-Helge Müller; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Klaus-Jochen Klose; Peter Barth; Matthias Wied; Christina Mayer; Behnaz Aminossadati; Ulrich-Frank Pape; Michael Bläker; Jan Harder; Christian Arnold; Thomas Gress; Rudolf Arnold Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Martyn E Caplin; Marianne Pavel; Jarosław B Ćwikła; Alexandria T Phan; Markus Raderer; Eva Sedláčková; Guillaume Cadiot; Edward M Wolin; Jaume Capdevila; Lucy Wall; Guido Rindi; Alison Langley; Séverine Martinez; Joëlle Blumberg; Philippe Ruszniewski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James C Yao; Alexandria T Phan; David Z Chang; Robert A Wolff; Kenneth Hess; Sanjay Gupta; Carmen Jacobs; Jeannette E Mares; Andrea N Landgraf; Asif Rashid; Funda Meric-Bernstam Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-09-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David L Chan; Diego Ferone; Manuela Albertelli; Nick Pavlakis; Eva Segelov; Simron Singh Journal: Endocrine Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Robert A Ramirez; Aman Chauhan; Juan Gimenez; Katharine E H Thomas; Ioni Kokodis; Brianne A Voros Journal: Rev Endocr Metab Disord Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 6.514
Authors: Kendall J Keck; Allen Choi; Jessica E Maxwell; Guiying Li; Thomas M O'Dorisio; Patrick Breheny; Andrew M Bellizzi; James R Howe Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 5.344