Literature DB >> 25242563

A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.

Daisuke Ban1, Minoru Tanabe, Hiromitsu Ito, Yuichiro Otsuka, Hiroyuki Nitta, Yuta Abe, Yasushi Hasegawa, Toshio Katagiri, Chisato Takagi, Osamu Itano, Hironori Kaneko, Go Wakabayashi.   

Abstract

Early on, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) was limited to partial resection, but major LLR is no longer rare. A difficulty scoring system is required to guide surgeons in advancing from simple to highly technical laparoscopic resections. Subjects were 90 patients who had undergone pure LLR at three medical institutions (30 patients/institution) from January 2011 to April 2014. Surgical difficulty was assessed by the operator using an index of 1-10 with the following divisions: 1-3 low difficulty, 4-6 intermediate difficulty, and 7-10 high difficulty. Weighted kappa statistic was used to calculate the concordance between the operators' and reviewers' (expert surgeon) difficulty index. Inter-rater agreement (weighted kappa statistic) between the operators' and reviewers' assessments was 0.89 with the three-level difficulty index and 0.80 with the 10-level difficulty index. A 10-level difficulty index by linear modeling based on clinical information revealed a weighted kappa statistic of 0.72 and that scored by the extent of liver resection, tumor location, tumor size, liver function, and tumor proximity to major vessels revealed a weighted kappa statistic of 0.68. We proposed a new scoring system to predict difficulty of various LLRs preoperatively. The calculated score well reflected difficulty.
© 2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Difficulty index; Difficulty score; Laparoscopic hepatectomy; Laparoscopic liver resection; Surgical difficulty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25242563     DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci        ISSN: 1868-6974            Impact factor:   7.027


  107 in total

1.  National trends with a laparoscopic liver resection: results from a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Jin He; Neda Amini; Gaya Spolverato; Kenzo Hirose; Martin Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Learning curve in laparoscopic liver surgery: a fellow's perspective.

Authors:  Adrian Kah Heng Chiow; Ser Yee Lee; Chung Yip Chan; Siong San Tan
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Laparoscopic liver resection for segment VII lesion using a combination of rubber band retraction method and flexible laparoscope.

Authors:  Jin Woo Lee; Sung Hoon Choi; Seungki Kim; Sung Won Kwon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive repeat hepatectomy for recurrent liver cancer.

Authors:  Takehiro Noda; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Hiroshi Wada; Yoshifumi Iwagami; Daisaku Yamada; Tadafumi Asaoka; Kunihito Gotoh; Koichi Kawamoto; Yutaka Takeda; Masahiro Tanemura; Koji Umeshita; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic Compared to Open Repeat Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Multi-institutional Propensity-Matched Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Antonio Sa Cunha; Daniel Cherqui; Brice Gayet; Diane Goéré; Philippe Bachellier; Alexis Laurent; David Fuks; Francis Navarro; Patrick Pessaux
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  The Italian Consensus on minimally invasive simultaneous resections for synchronous liver metastasis and primary colorectal cancer: A Delphi methodology.

Authors:  Aldo Rocca; Federica Cipriani; Paolo Delrio; Fulvio Calise; Luca Aldrighetti; Giulio Belli; Stefano Berti; Ugo Boggi; Vincenzo Bottino; Umberto Cillo; Matteo Cescon; Matteo Cimino; Francesco Corcione; Luciano De Carlis; Maurizio Degiuli; Paolo De Paolis; Agostino Maria De Rose; Domenico D'Ugo; Fabrizio Di Benedetto; Ugo Elmore; Giorgio Ercolani; Giuseppe M Ettorre; Alessandro Ferrero; Marco Filauro; Felice Giuliante; Salvatore Gruttadauria; Alfredo Guglielmi; Francesco Izzo; Elio Jovine; Andrea Laurenzi; Francesco Marchegiani; Pierluigi Marini; Marco Massani; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Michela Mineccia; Francesco Minni; Andrea Muratore; Simone Nicosia; Riccardo Pellicci; Riccardo Rosati; Nadia Russolillo; Antonino Spinelli; Gaya Spolverato; Guido Torzilli; Giovanni Vennarecci; Luca Viganò; Leonardo Vincenti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-06-05

Review 7.  The difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Daisuke Ban; Atsushi Kudo; Hiromitsu Ito; Yusuke Mitsunori; Satoshi Matsumura; Arihiro Aihara; Takanori Ochiai; Shinji Tanaka; Minoru Tanabe; Osamu Itano; Hironori Kaneko; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-07-10

8.  From Louisville to Morioka: where is now MILS?

Authors:  Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-07-08

9.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for lesions located in posterosuperior segments: a meta-analysis of short-term and oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Huan Zheng; Shao Gang Huang; Shu Min Qin; Fei Xiang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  What is the Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomy?

Authors:  Kimberly M Brown; David A Geller
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.