Samuel M Brown1,2, Sigall K Bell3, Stephanie D Roche1, Erica Dente4, Ariel Mueller3, Tae-Eun Kim1, Kristin O'Reilly1, Barbara Sarnoff Lee5, Ken Sands1,3, Daniel Talmor3. 1. 1 Center for Healthcare Delivery Science. 2. 2 Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Healthcare and Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. 3. 3 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and. 4. 4 Patient and Family Advisory Council, and. 5. 5 Department of Social Work, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
RATIONALE: The quality of communication with patients and family members in intensive care units (ICUs) is a focus of current interest for clinical care improvement. Electronic communication portals are commonly used in other healthcare settings to improve communication. We do not know whether patients and family members desire such portals in ICUs, and if so, what functionality they should provide. OBJECTIVES: To define interest in and desired elements of an electronic communication portal among current and potential ICU patients and their family members. METHODS: We surveyed, via an Internet panel, 1,050 English-speaking adults residing in the United States with a personal or family history of an ICU admission within 10 years (cohort A) and 1,050 individuals without a history of such admission (cohort B). We also administered a survey instrument in person to 105 family members of patients currently admitted to ICUs at an academic medical center in Boston (cohort C). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Respondents, especially current ICU family members, supported an electronic communication portal, including access via an electronic tablet. They wanted at least daily updates, one-paragraph summaries of family meetings including a list of key decisions made, and knowledge of the role and experience of treating clinicians. Overall, they preferred detailed rather than "big picture" information. Respondents were generally comfortable sharing information with their family members. Preferences regarding a communication portal varied significantly by age, sex, ethnicity, and prior experience with ICU hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic communication portals appear welcome in contemporary ICUs. Frequent updates, knowledge about the professional qualifications of clinicians, detailed medical information, and documentation of family meetings are particularly desired.
RATIONALE: The quality of communication with patients and family members in intensive care units (ICUs) is a focus of current interest for clinical care improvement. Electronic communication portals are commonly used in other healthcare settings to improve communication. We do not know whether patients and family members desire such portals in ICUs, and if so, what functionality they should provide. OBJECTIVES: To define interest in and desired elements of an electronic communication portal among current and potential ICU patients and their family members. METHODS: We surveyed, via an Internet panel, 1,050 English-speaking adults residing in the United States with a personal or family history of an ICU admission within 10 years (cohort A) and 1,050 individuals without a history of such admission (cohort B). We also administered a survey instrument in person to 105 family members of patients currently admitted to ICUs at an academic medical center in Boston (cohort C). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Respondents, especially current ICU family members, supported an electronic communication portal, including access via an electronic tablet. They wanted at least daily updates, one-paragraph summaries of family meetings including a list of key decisions made, and knowledge of the role and experience of treating clinicians. Overall, they preferred detailed rather than "big picture" information. Respondents were generally comfortable sharing information with their family members. Preferences regarding a communication portal varied significantly by age, sex, ethnicity, and prior experience with ICU hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic communication portals appear welcome in contemporary ICUs. Frequent updates, knowledge about the professional qualifications of clinicians, detailed medical information, and documentation of family meetings are particularly desired.
Entities:
Keywords:
communication; critical care; electronic portals; patient-centered care; personal health records
Authors: Onur Asan; Matthew C Scanlon; Bradley Crotty; Richard J Holden; Kathryn E Flynn Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Michael J Goldfarb; Christine Bechtel; Quinn Capers; Ann de Velasco; John A Dodson; Jamie L Jackson; Lisa Kitko; Ileana L Piña; Erin Rayner-Hartley; Nanette K Wenger; Martha Gulati Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Stephanie D Roche; Alyse M Reichheld; Nicholas Demosthenes; Anna C Johansson; Michael D Howell; Michael N Cocchi; Bruce E Landon; Jennifer P Stevens Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sarah J Beesley; Alex Powell; Danielle Groat; Jorie Butler; Ramona O Hopkins; Ronen Rozenblum; Hanan Aboumatar; Allison M Butler; Jeremy Sugarman; Leslie Francis; Samuel M Brown Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 9.296
Authors: Sigall K Bell; Stephanie D Roche; Ariel Mueller; Erica Dente; Kristin O'Reilly; Barbara Sarnoff Lee; Kenneth Sands; Daniel Talmor; Samuel M Brown Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 7.035