Literature DB >> 26700034

Progestin and breast cancer risk: a systematic review.

Marsha Samson1,2,3, Nancy Porter4,5,6, Olubunmi Orekoya4,6, James R Hebert4,5,6, Swann Arp Adams4,5,6, Charles L Bennett7, Susan E Steck4,5.   

Abstract

This systematic review summarizes research on the use of progestin and breast cancer risk. Although mainly used for contraception, progestin can help treat menstrual disorders, and benign breast, uterine, and ovarian diseases. Breast cancer is the leading site of new, non-skin, cancers in females in the United States, and possible factors that may modulate breast cancer risk need to be identified. ProQuest (Ann Arbor, MI) and PubMed-Medline (US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda MD, USA) databases were used to search for epidemiologic studies from 2000 to 2015 that examined the association between progestin and breast cancer. Search terms included epidemiologic studies + progesterone or progestin or progestogen or contraceptive or contraceptive agents + breast cancer or breast neoplasms. A total of six studies were included in the review. Five of the six studies reported no association between progestin-only formulations (including norethindrone oral contraceptives, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, injectable, levonorgestrel system users, implantable and intrauterine devices) and breast cancer risk. Duration of use was examined in a few studies with heterogeneous results. Unlike studies of other oral contraceptives, studies indicate that progestin-only formulations do not increase the risk of breast cancer, although the literature is hampered by small sample sizes. Future research is needed to corroborate these findings, as further understanding of synthetic progesterone may initiate new prescription practices or guidelines for women's health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Contraception; Pharmacoepidemiology; Progesterone; Progestin; Progestogen; Risk

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26700034      PMCID: PMC4706804          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3663-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  19 in total

1.  Risk of breast cancer in relation to the use of injectable progestogen contraceptives and combined estrogen/progestogen contraceptives.

Authors:  S Shapiro; L Rosenberg; M Hoffman; H Truter; D Cooper; S Rao; D Dent; A Gudgeon; J van Zyl; J Katzenellenbogen; R Baillie
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Polly A Marchbanks; Jill A McDonald; Hoyt G Wilson; Suzanne G Folger; Michele G Mandel; Janet R Daling; Leslie Bernstein; Kathleen E Malone; Giske Ursin; Brian L Strom; Sandra A Norman; Phyllis A Wingo; Ronald T Burkman; Jesse A Berlin; Michael S Simon; Robert Spirtas; Linda K Weiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Estrogen-free oral hormonal contraception: benefits of the progestin-only pill.

Authors:  Nilson Roberto de Melo
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2010-09

4.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: further results. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Use of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk: The Norwegian-Swedish Women's Lifestyle and Health Cohort Study.

Authors:  Merethe Kumle; Elisabete Weiderpass; Tonje Braaten; Ingemar Persson; Hans-Olov Adami; Eiliv Lund
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  Uses of progesterone in clinical practice.

Authors:  M P Warren; S Shantha
Journal:  Int J Fertil Womens Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

8.  Absence of an effect of injectable and implantable progestin-only contraceptives on subsequent risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Brian L Strom; Jesse A Berlin; Anita L Weber; Sandra A Norman; Leslie Bernstein; Ronald T Burkman; Janet R Daling; Dennis Deapen; Suzanne G Folger; Kathleen E Malone; Polly A Marchbanks; Michael S Simon; Giske Ursin; Linda K Weiss; Robert Spirtas
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Breast cancer and specific types of oral contraceptives: a large Norwegian cohort study.

Authors:  Vanessa Dumeaux; Elin Alsaker; Eiliv Lund
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-07-20       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 10.  Assessing the risk of venous thromboembolic events in women taking progestin-only contraception: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Mantha; R Karp; V Raghavan; N Terrin; K A Bauer; J I Zwicker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-08-07
View more
  18 in total

1.  Cardiovascular disease incidence among females in South Carolina by type of oral contraceptives, 2000-2013: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marsha E Samson; Swann A Adams; Anwar T Merchant; Whitney D Maxwell; Jiajia Zhang; Charles L Bennett; James R Hebert
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Types of oral contraceptives and breast cancer survival among women enrolled in Medicaid: A competing-risk model.

Authors:  Marsha E Samson; Swann Arp Adams; Caroline M Mulatya; Jiajia Zhang; Charles L Bennett; James Hebert; Susan E Steck
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Progesterone and Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Britton Trabert; Mark E Sherman; Nagarajan Kannan; Frank Z Stanczyk
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 19.871

4.  Hormonal Contraceptives Improve Women's Health and Should Continue to Be Covered by Health Insurance Plans.

Authors:  Carol J Hogue; Kelli Stidham Hall; Melissa Kottke
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Progestin-only and combined oral contraceptives and receptor-defined premenopausal breast cancer risk: The Norwegian Women and Cancer Study.

Authors:  Marit Busund; Nora S Bugge; Tonje Braaten; Marit Waaseth; Charlotta Rylander; Eiliv Lund
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Breast Cancer Risk Factors: a Cross- Cultural Comparison between the West and the East

Authors:  Lina Kurdahi Badr; Laura Bourdeanu; Manal Alatrash; Garine Bekarian
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-08-24

7.  Expression and potential molecular mechanisms of miR‑204‑5p in breast cancer, based on bioinformatics and a meta‑analysis of 2,306 cases.

Authors:  Kai-Teng Cai; An-Gui Liu; Ze-Feng Wang; Hang-Wei Jiang; Jing-Jing Zeng; Rong-Quan He; Jie Ma; Gang Chen; Jin-Cai Zhong
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 2.952

8.  After the Affordable Care Act: the Effects of the Health Safety Net and the Medicaid Expansion on Latinxs' Use of Behavioral Healthcare in the US.

Authors:  Robert Rosales; David Takeuchi; Rocío Calvo
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.505

Review 9.  Executive Summary of the Early-Onset Breast Cancer Evidence Review Conference.

Authors:  David Chelmow; Mark D Pearlman; Amy Young; Laura Bozzuto; Sandra Dayaratna; Myrlene Jeudy; Mallory E Kremer; Dana Marie Scott; Julia Sage O'Hara
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 7.623

10.  DEAD-box RNA Helicase 39 Promotes Invasiveness and Chemoresistance of ER-positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Xiudi Wang; Peipei Li; Chenying Wang; Dagui Zhang; Linghui Zeng; Xiyong Liu; Jiajin Lin
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.