Literature DB >> 29349773

Progestin-only and combined oral contraceptives and receptor-defined premenopausal breast cancer risk: The Norwegian Women and Cancer Study.

Marit Busund1, Nora S Bugge1, Tonje Braaten1, Marit Waaseth2, Charlotta Rylander1, Eiliv Lund1.   

Abstract

Receptor-defined subtypes of breast cancer represent distinct cancer types and have differences in risk factors. Whether the two main hormonal forms of oral contraceptives (OCs); i.e. progestin-only (POC) and combined oral contraceptives (COC), are differentially associated with these subtypes are not well known. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of POC and COC use on hormone receptor-defined breast cancer risk in premenopausal women in a prospective population-based cohort - The Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC). Information on OC use was collected from 74,862 premenopausal women at baseline. Updated information was applied when follow-up information became available. Multiple imputation was performed to handle missing data, and multivariable Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) for breast cancer. 1,245 incident invasive breast cancer cases occurred. POC use ≥5 years was associated with ER+ (HR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.09- 2.32, ptrend  = 0.03) and ER+/PR+ cancer (HR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.07-2.48, ptrend  = 0.05), and was not associated with ER- (pheterogeneity  = 0.36) or ER-/PR- (pheterogeneity  = 0.49) cancer. COC use was associated with ER- and ER-/PR- cancer, but did not increase risk of ER+ and ER+/PR+ cancer. Current COC use gave different estimates for ER/PR-defined subtypes (pheterogeneity  = 0.04). This is the first study to show significant associations between POC use and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The lack of power to distinguish effects of POC use on subtype development calls for the need of larger studies to confirm our finding.
© 2018 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer subtypes; multiple imputation; oral contraceptives; prospective cohort study; tumor heterogeneity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29349773      PMCID: PMC5893363          DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  49 in total

1.  Reproductive history and oral contraceptive use in relation to risk of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; Rowan T Chlebowski; Ross Prentice; Anne McTiernan; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Lewis H Kuller; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Dorothy Lane; Marcia L Stefanick; Mara Vitolins; Geoffrey C Kabat; Thomas E Rohan; Christopher I Li
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Potential for bias in case-control studies of oral contraceptives and breast cancer.

Authors:  D C Skegg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks.

Authors:  R L Prentice; J D Kalbfleisch; A V Peterson; N Flournoy; V T Farewell; N E Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Reproductive factors and breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Kelsey; M D Gammon; E M John
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Use of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk: The Norwegian-Swedish Women's Lifestyle and Health Cohort Study.

Authors:  Merethe Kumle; Elisabete Weiderpass; Tonje Braaten; Ingemar Persson; Hans-Olov Adami; Eiliv Lund
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Established breast cancer risk factors and risk of intrinsic tumor subtypes.

Authors:  Mollie E Barnard; Caroline E Boeke; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-06-10

7.  Oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk among younger women.

Authors:  L A Brinton; J R Daling; J M Liff; J B Schoenberg; K E Malone; J L Stanford; R J Coates; M D Gammon; L Hanson; R N Hoover
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-06-07       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Differential effects of reproductive factors on the risk of pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer. Results from a large cohort of French women.

Authors:  F Clavel-Chapelon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-03-04       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Parity, hormones and breast cancer subtypes - results from a large nested case-control study in a national screening program.

Authors:  Merete Ellingjord-Dale; Linda Vos; Steinar Tretli; Solveig Hofvind; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  9 in total

1.  Recent Use of Oral Contraceptives and Risk of Luminal B, Triple-Negative, and HER2-Overexpressing Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nicole C Lorona; Linda S Cook; Mei-Tzu C Tang; Deirdre A Hill; Charles L Wiggins; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.869

2.  Geospatiotemporal and causal inference study of cannabis and other drugs as risk factors for female breast cancer USA 2003-2017.

Authors:  Albert Stuart Reece; Gary Kenneth Hulse
Journal:  Environ Epigenet       Date:  2022-03-01

3.  Crosstalk between progesterone receptor membrane component 1 and estrogen receptor α promotes breast cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Diego A Pedroza; Ramadevi Subramani; Kira Tiula; Anthony Do; Navya Rashiraj; Adriana Galvez; Animesh Chatterjee; Alejandra Bencomo; Servando Rivera; Rajkumar Lakshmanaswamy
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.662

4.  Oral Contraceptive and Breast Cancer Risks: a Case Control Study in Six Referral Hospitals in Indonesia

Authors:  Mugi Wahidin; Ratna Djuwita; Asri Adisasmita
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-08-24

5.  National and Subnational Incidence, Mortality, and Years of Life Lost Due to Breast Cancer in Iran: Trends and Age-Period-Cohort Analysis Since 1990.

Authors:  Bahar Ataeinia; Sahar Saeedi Moghaddam; Mahsima Shabani; Kimiya Gohari; Ali Sheidaei; Nazila Rezaei; Shohreh Naderimagham; Erfan Ghasemi; Mahtab Rouhifard Khalilabad; Shahin Roshani; Yosef Farzi; Farshad Farzadfar
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Night shift work, chemical coexposures and risk of female breast cancer in the Norwegian Offshore Petroleum Workers (NOPW) cohort: a prospectively recruited case-cohort study.

Authors:  Fei Chih Liu; Marit Bragelien Veierød; Kristina Kjærheim; Trude Eid Robsahm; Reza Ghiasvand; H Dean Hosgood; Sven Ove Samuelsen; Magne Bråtveit; Jorunn Kirkeleit; Nathaniel Rothman; Qing Lan; Debra T Silverman; Melissa C Friesen; Ronnie Babigumira; Nita Shala; Tom K Grimsrud; Jo Steinson Stenehjem
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The Association Between Triglyceride-Glucose Index as a Marker of Insulin Resistance and the Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sonar Soni Panigoro; Noorwati Sutandyo; Fiastuti Witjaksono; Nurjati Chairani Siregar; Ramadhan Ramli; Ririn Hariani; Eko Adhi Pangarsa; Yan Wisnu Prajoko; Niken Puruhita; William Hamdani; Dimas Bayu; Mardiana Madjid; Dedy Yulidar; Jane Estherina Fransiska; Retno Widyawati; Effif Syofra Tripriadi; Wiwit Ade F W; Dewi Krisna Yunda; Raymond Pranata
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  Hormonal contraception and risk of breast cancer and breast cancer in situ among Swedish women 15-34 years of age: A nationwide register-based study.

Authors:  Jenny Niemeyer Hultstrand; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Helena Kopp Kallner; Henrik Lindman; Per Wikman; Inger Sundström-Poromaa
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-07-29

Review 9.  Review of the literature on combined oral contraceptives and cancer.

Authors:  Mustafa Kamani; Utku Akgor; Murat Gültekin
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2022-06-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.