Literature DB >> 16711050

Complex responses within a desert bee guild (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) to urban habitat fragmentation.

James H Cane1, Robert L Minckley, Linda J Kervin, T'ai H Roulston, Neal M Williams.   

Abstract

Urbanization within the Tucson Basin of Arizona during the past 50+ years has fragmented the original desert scrub into patches of different sizes and ages. These remnant patches and the surrounding desert are dominated by Larrea tridentata (creosote bush), a long-lived shrub whose flowers are visited by > 120 native bee species across its range. Twenty-one of these bee species restrict their pollen foraging to L. tridentata. To evaluate the response of this bee fauna to fragmentation, we compared species incidence and abundance patterns for the bee guild visiting L. tridentata at 59 habitat fragments of known size (0.002-5 ha) and age (up to 70 years), and in adjacent desert. The 62 bee species caught during this study responded to fragmentation heterogeneously and not in direct relation to their abundance or incidence in undisturbed desert. Few species found outside the city were entirely absent from urban fragments. Species of ground-nesting L. tridentata specialists were underrepresented in smaller fragments and less abundant in the smaller and older fragments. In contrast, cavity-nesting bees (including one L. tridentata specialist) were overrepresented in the habitat fragments, probably due to enhanced nesting opportunities available in the urban matrix. Small-bodied bee species were no more likely than larger bodied species to be absent from the smaller fragments. The introduced European honey bee, Apis mellifera, was a minor faunal element at > 90% of the fragments and exerted little if any influence on the response of native bee species to fragmentation. Overall, bee response to urban habitat fragmentation was best predicted by ecological traits associated with nesting and dietary breadth. Had species been treated as individual units in the analyses, or pooled together into one analysis, these response patterns may not have been apparent. Pollination interactions with this floral host are probably not adversely affected in this system because of its longevity and ability to attract diverse pollinators but will demand careful further study to understand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16711050     DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0632:crwadb]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  40 in total

1.  Spatio-temporal Genetic Structure of a Tropical Bee Species Suggests High Dispersal Over a Fragmented Landscape.

Authors:  Sevan S Suni; Judith L Bronstein; Berry J Brosi
Journal:  Biotropica       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 2.508

2.  Trap-Nesting Hymenoptera and Their Network with Parasites in Recovered Riparian Forests Brazil.

Authors:  G J Araujo; R Fagundes; Y Antonini
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 1.434

3.  Urbanization-mediated context dependence in the effect of floral neighborhood on pollinator visitation.

Authors:  Gordon M Fitch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Diversity of wild bees supports pollination services in an urbanized landscape.

Authors:  David M Lowenstein; Kevin C Matteson; Emily S Minor
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Modeling the status, trends, and impacts of wild bee abundance in the United States.

Authors:  Insu Koh; Eric V Lonsdorf; Neal M Williams; Claire Brittain; Rufus Isaacs; Jason Gibbs; Taylor H Ricketts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops.

Authors:  Alexandra-Maria Klein; Bernard E Vaissière; James H Cane; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Saul A Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Plant-animal interactions in suburban environments: implications for floral evolution.

Authors:  Rebecca E Irwin; Paige S Warren; Adrian L Carper; Lynn S Adler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Reproduction of Amorpha canescens (Fabaceae) and diversity of its bee community in a fragmented landscape.

Authors:  Malinda W Slagle; Stephen D Hendrix
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Does urbanization favour exotic bee species? Implications for the conservation of native bees in cities.

Authors:  Gordon Fitch; Caleb J Wilson; Paul Glaum; Chatura Vaidya; Maria-Carolina Simao; Mary A Jamieson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  The whereabouts of flower visitors: contrasting land-use preferences revealed by a country-wide survey based on citizen science.

Authors:  Nicolas Deguines; Romain Julliard; Mathieu de Flores; Colin Fontaine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.